Study of ITCA 650 (Exenatide in DUROS) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT00943917

Last Updated: 2015-04-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-31

Study Completion Date

2011-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine safety, efficacy and tolerability of various doses of ITCA 650 in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ITCA 650 20 mcg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

ITCA 650 40 mcg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

Exenatide Injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exenatide Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

twice daily (BID) injections of exenatide commercially available Byetta: 5 mcg/dose first 12 weeks then 10 mcg/dose for 8 weeks

ITCA 650 20/20

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

ITCA 650 20/60

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

ITCA 650 40/40

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

ITCA 650 40/80

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

Ex Inj/ITCA 650 40

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ex Inj/ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

twice-daily (BID) exenatide injection: 5 mcg/dose for 4 weeks then 10 mcg/dose for 8 weeks, followed by ITCA 650

Ex Inj/ITCA 650 60

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ex Inj/ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

twice-daily (BID) exenatide injection: 5 mcg/dose for 4 weeks then 10 mcg/dose for 8 weeks, followed by ITCA 650

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ITCA 650

ITCA 650 (continuous delivery of exenatide in DUROS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Exenatide Injection

twice daily (BID) injections of exenatide commercially available Byetta: 5 mcg/dose first 12 weeks then 10 mcg/dose for 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Ex Inj/ITCA 650

twice-daily (BID) exenatide injection: 5 mcg/dose for 4 weeks then 10 mcg/dose for 8 weeks, followed by ITCA 650

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Byetta Byetta

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males or females age 18-70 years
* Type 2 diabetes mellitus for ≥ 6 months prior to Screening Visit 1
* On a stable (\> 3 months prior to Screening Visit 1) treatment regimen of metformin monotherapy;
* Fasting plasma glucose \< 240 mg/dL at Screening Visit 1
* HbA1c ≥ 7% and ≤ 10% at Screening Visit 1

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior treatment with exenatide
* Treatment with any of the following antidiabetic agents within 3 months prior to Screening Visit 1: TZDs, sulfonylureas, DPP IV inhibitors, acarbose, or insulin (injected or inhaled)
* History of type 1 diabetes and/or history of diabetic ketoacidosis
* Body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2;
* History of organ transplantation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Intarcia Therapeutics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Study Site

Chino, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Valley Village, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Pueblo, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Miramar, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Study Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Study Site

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Irving, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Olympia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Henry RR, Rosenstock J, Logan DK, Alessi TR, Luskey K, Baron MA. Randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous delivery of exenatide by ITCA 650 versus twice-daily exenatide injections in metformin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2559-65. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2410. Epub 2013 May 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23645886 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ITCA 650-CLP-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00490854 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3