A Study of Taspoglutide Versus Exenatide for the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin, Thiazolidinedione or a Combination of Both.

NCT ID: NCT00717457

Last Updated: 2016-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1189 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 3-arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of taspoglutide compared with exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin, thiazolidinedione or a combination of both. Patients will be randomized to receive taspoglutide (10mg once weekly or 10mg once weekly for 4 weeks followed by 20mg once weekly) or exenatide (5 micrograms twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 10 micrograms twice daily) in a ratio of 1:1:1 in addition to continued prestudy metformin and thiazolidinedione either alone or in combination. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3+ years, and the target sample size is \>500 individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

exenatide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

exenatide

Intervention Type DRUG

5mg twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 10mg twice daily

taspoglutide 10mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

10mg once weekly

taspoglutide 10mg/20mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

10mg once weekly for 4 weeks followed by 20mg once weekly

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

exenatide

5mg twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 10mg twice daily

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

10mg once weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

10mg once weekly for 4 weeks followed by 20mg once weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients, 18-75 years of age;
* type 2 diabetes receiving metformin and/or pioglitazone or rosiglitazone for at least 12 weeks;
* HbA1c \>=7.0% and \<=10% at screening;
* BMI \>=25kg/m2 (\>23kg/m2 for Asians) and \<=45kg/m2 at screening;
* stable weight +/- 5% for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* history of type 1 diabetes, diabetes resulting from pancreatic injury or secondary forms of diabetes;
* history of acute metabolic diabetic complications within the previous 6 months;
* evidence of clinically significant diabetic complications;
* known proliferative diabetic retinopathy;
* myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass surgery, post-transplantation cardiomyopathy (PTCM) or stroke within the past 6 months;
* any abnormality in clinical laboratory test or ECG, which precludes safe involvement in the study as judged by the investigator;
* known hemoglobinopathy or chronic anemia;
* clinically significant gastrointestinal disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Haleyville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Leandro, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Green Cove Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Niceville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Suwanee, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Lombard, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Munfordville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Concord, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Whitehouse, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Smithtown, New York, United States

Site Status

Springfield Gardens, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

West Seneca, New York, United States

Site Status

Westfield, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Huntersville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Westlake, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Red Lion, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Clemson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory Grove, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Everett, Washington, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Freemantle, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Curtiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Belém, Pará, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Mogi Das Cruzes - Sp, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Ballerup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status

Dommartin-lès-Toul, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Narbonne, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Salouël, , France

Site Status

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Damme, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Falkensee, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Ludwigshafen, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Neuwied, , Germany

Site Status

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Pirna, , Germany

Site Status

Rhaunen, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Zwenkau, , Germany

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Pordenone, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy

Site Status

Genoa, Liguria, Italy

Site Status

Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Olbia, Sardinia, Italy

Site Status

Siena, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Acapulco, , Mexico

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Tampico, , Mexico

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

S. Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

S.Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Bacarot Alicant, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Almería, Almeria, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Alzira, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Karlstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Simferopol, , Ukraine

Site Status

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bradford-on-Avon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Lanarkshire, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Trowbridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Canada Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Guatemala Israel Italy Mexico New Zealand Peru Puerto Rico Russia South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Thailand Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rosenstock J, Balas B, Charbonnel B, Bolli GB, Boldrin M, Ratner R, Balena R; T-emerge 2 Study Group. The fate of taspoglutide, a weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist, versus twice-daily exenatide for type 2 diabetes: the T-emerge 2 trial. Diabetes Care. 2013 Mar;36(3):498-504. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0709. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23139373 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001856-36

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BC21625

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id