Non-Mesh Versus Mesh Method for Inguinal Hernia Repair

NCT ID: NCT00941941

Last Updated: 2009-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims at establishing the effectiveness of the non-mesh (Desarda) technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernias at Mulago Hospital in Uganda. First developed and used in India, the Desarda method is reported to offer superior outcomes such as minimal postoperative groin pain and near zero recurrence rates. In comparison to the mesh-based repairs, it is a simple and affordable technique suitable for the resource-constrained communities. It is devoid of complications associated with foreign body implants. Early clinical outcomes which include acute groin pain, time to resumption of normal gait, operative time and complications will be assessed. Participants will be followed at 2 hours, 3 days, 7 days and 14 days postoperatively.

The investigators hypothesize that the mean postoperative acute groin pain score, or the mean postoperative day of return to normal gait is different in adult patients who undergo the non-mesh (Desarda) repair from what it is in those who undergo the mesh (Lichtenstein) technique of hernia repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia, Inguinal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Non-mesh Hernia Repair

Reinforcement with a strip of external oblique aponeurosis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-mesh Hernia Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Non-mesh method for treatment of inguinal hernia without the use of a foreign material (mesh). It involves reinforcement of the weakened posterior wall of inguinal canal with a small, undetached strip of aponeurotic tissue of external

Mesh Hernia Repair

Polypropylene mesh placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mesh Hernia Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mesh method for treatment of inguinal hernias by use of an implant (mesh) to reinforce the weakened posterior wall of the inguinal canal. The mesh is made of polypropylene material.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-mesh Hernia Repair

Non-mesh method for treatment of inguinal hernia without the use of a foreign material (mesh). It involves reinforcement of the weakened posterior wall of inguinal canal with a small, undetached strip of aponeurotic tissue of external

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mesh Hernia Repair

Mesh method for treatment of inguinal hernias by use of an implant (mesh) to reinforce the weakened posterior wall of the inguinal canal. The mesh is made of polypropylene material.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Desarda repair Lichtenstein repair

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 18 and above;
* with a primary, reducible inguinal or inguino-scrotal hernia;
* who consent to participate in the study;
* who have a telephone contact.

Exclusion Criteria

* Giant inguino-scrotal hernias;
* Obstructive uropathy or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
* Impaired mental state and are unable to give an accurate assessment of the key outcomes of the operation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mulago Hospital, Uganda

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Makerere University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Makerere University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William Manyilirah

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Makerere University

Alex Upoki

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Makerere University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mulago National Referral Hospital

Kampala, Central Region, Uganda

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Uganda

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC REF 2009-080

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2006/HD11/6219U

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

When and Why Desarda Repair
NCT05088824 UNKNOWN