Comparison Between Desarda and Lichtenstein's Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair Under Local Anaesthesia

NCT ID: NCT03512366

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-09

Study Completion Date

2020-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Inguinal hernia repair is done by two methods. The conventional method uses a prosthetic mesh for strengthening the defect but has been associated with complications. Another new method uses a strip of the external oblique aponeurosis to do the same.There is a necessity to conduct studies comparing the two methods of hernia repair under local anaesthesia in terms of feasibility, economic benefits, faster ambulation with less complications. The purpose of the study is to find a method that will lead to faster disposal of patients and early return to activities, thereby reducing the waiting list of patients that compromises their financial and social spheres and overwhelms the welfare system.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common treatable surgical conditions. The synthetic prostheses most often used in the inguinal area may in some cases create new clinical problems, such as foreign body sensation in the groin, discomfort, and abdominal wall stiffness, surgical site infections, migration of mesh and may affect procreation and sexual function, The cost and availability of mesh prostheses in smaller towns and underdeveloped regions proves to be a major hindrance. The requirement of the hour is to find a technique that is simple, cost effective, easy to perform, does not require extensive dissection or use of a foreign body, and also gives an acceptable recurrence rate without any major intra or post-operative complications and can be performed as a day care procedure to reduce the burden of cases in our community. A possible option for this is the Desarda method, presented in 2001, which uses an undetached strip of aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle instead of a mesh and has shown to have promising results in studies conducted so far. Several retrospective and randomized controlled trials have shown that local anaesthesia provides the best clinical and economic benefits to patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. As there have been no studies till date comparing the outcomes for patients operated by these methods under local anaesthesia only, hence this study has been planned to assess if Desarda's technique is suitable to be used as a day care procedure with early return to normal activities after surgery, less post operative discomfort and minimum dose of analgesics and acceptable recurrence rates. This will help reduce the burden of the hospitals as these patients can be operated on a day care basis with minimal discomfort.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernias Inguinal Reducible Local Anaesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

DESARDA'S NO MESH REPAIR:

It will be performed according to the surgical technique described by Dr. Desarda. A strip will be separated from the upper leaf of the external oblique aponeurosis keeping its insertion and continuity with the muscle intact. This strip will be sutured with the inguinal ligament below and the newly formed upper leaf of EOA above behind the spermatic cord to form the new inguinal floor. Continuous non absorbable prolene 2-0 suture will be used to secure the aponeurotic strip to the inguinal ligament inferiorly , and the strip will be secured superiorly to the internal oblique muscle using interrupted absorbable vicryl sutures. This strip will be put under tension by muscular contraction and works as a shield to prevent recurrence as it gives additional strength to the weakened internal oblique and transverses abdominis muscles.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
This will be a double blind trial .The patient will not be revealed about the technique being performed. The investigator who will follow up the patients post operatively in the out-patient clinic will also be blinded about the procedure performed on the patient.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Desarsda's technique

These patients wil be operated by the Desarda's technique without using any prosthetic mesh. A strip of external oblique aponeurosis will be used to strengthen the defect.

Both field block and local infiltration with tumescent anaesthesia techniques will be used for anaesthesia

Intervention:

A strip will be separated from the upper leaf of the external oblique aponeurosis keeping its insertion and continuity with the muscle intact. This strip will be sutured with the inguinal ligament below and the muscle arch or conjoint tendon above behind the spermatic cord to form the new inguinal floor. Continuous non absorbable prolene 2-0 suture will be used to secure it to the inguinal ligament inferiorly , and will be secured superiorly to the internal oblique muscle using interrupted absorbable vicryl sutures.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Desarda's technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

It will be performed by separating a strip from the upper leaf of the external oblique aponeurosis in continuity with the muscle and suturing it with the inguinal ligament below and the newly formed upper leaf of EOA above behind the spermatic cord to form the new inguinal floor. This strip will be put under tension by muscular contraction and works as a shield to prevent recurrence.

Lichtenstein's technique

These patients will be operated using prosthetic mesh described as Lichtenstein's tension free mesh hernioplasty.

Both field block and local infiltration with tumescent anaesthesia techniques will be used for anaesthesia.

Intervention :

A 6 × 11 cm polypropylene mesh will be fashioned to fit the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and sutured to the fibro-periosteum of the pubic bone and continued laterally, suturing the inferior edge of the mesh to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament to a point 2 cm lateral to the internal ring. Laterally, 2 cm silt will be made through the mesh to accommodate the cord. while the two tails will be sutured to create a new deep ring made of mesh.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lichtenstein's technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A 6 × 11 cm polypropylene mesh will be fashioned to fit the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and sutured to the fibro-periosteum of the pubic bone and continued laterally, suturing the inferior edge of the mesh to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament to a point 2 cm lateral to the internal ring.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Desarda's technique

It will be performed by separating a strip from the upper leaf of the external oblique aponeurosis in continuity with the muscle and suturing it with the inguinal ligament below and the newly formed upper leaf of EOA above behind the spermatic cord to form the new inguinal floor. This strip will be put under tension by muscular contraction and works as a shield to prevent recurrence.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lichtenstein's technique

A 6 × 11 cm polypropylene mesh will be fashioned to fit the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and sutured to the fibro-periosteum of the pubic bone and continued laterally, suturing the inferior edge of the mesh to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament to a point 2 cm lateral to the internal ring.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Desarda's No mesh repair Lichtenstein's tension free mesh hernioplasty

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary uncomplicated inguinal hernia
* Male patients aged more than 18 years and less than 80 years
* BMI less than 30kg/sq m
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) scale less than III

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with recurrent, irreducible or strangulated inguinal hernias
* Patients unable to interpret VAS or give consent
* Patients participating in other clinical trials
* Patients with infection in the inguinal region or epididymo-orchitis
* Patients allergic to local anaesthetics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Prakash Kumar Sasmal

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPT. OF GENERAL SURGERY

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Prakash Ku Sasmal, MBBS,MS,FNB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor, Dept. of General Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr. Prakash K. Sasmal, MBBS,MS,FNB

Role: CONTACT

9438884255

Dr. Ankit Sahoo, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

7504294760

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Szopinski J, Dabrowiecki S, Pierscinski S, Jackowski M, Jaworski M, Szuflet Z. Desarda versus Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia treatment: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012 May;36(5):984-992. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1508-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22392354 (View on PubMed)

Sasmal PK, Sahoo A, Mishra TS, Das Poddar KK, Ali SM, Singh PK, Kumar P. Feasibility and outcomes of Desarda vs Lichtenstein hernioplasty by local anesthesia for inguinal hernia: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1155-1163. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02837-5. Epub 2023 Jul 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37452974 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IECAIIMSBBSRPGThesis/17-18/38

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non-mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: Desarda Versus Darn
NCT06712212 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
When and Why Desarda Repair
NCT05088824 UNKNOWN