Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
288 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2013-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Achieving Patient-Centered Care and Optimized Health In Care Transitions by Evaluating the Value of Evidence
NCT02354482
Understanding Patient's Knowledge and Use of Acetaminophen
NCT00823758
Provider-Patient Communication Coaching
NCT02783742
Comparing Methods for Tracking Health Information at Home After Lung Transplant
NCT00818025
Intuition vs. Deliberation in Medical Decision Making
NCT02487810
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This 5 year randomized controlled trial will test the efficacy of an Uncertainty Management Intervention delivered via telephone by a nurse to the patient and caregiver. An attention control group of patients and caregivers will receive phone calls to discuss their experience of awaiting a liver transplant. Based on the problems and concerns of patients waiting for a liver transplant and the prior success of the Intervention for patients dealing with serious chronic illness, we believe the Uncertainty Management Intervention adapted specifically for ESLD patients will lead to significant improvements in patients' and caregivers' abilities to manage the symptoms and distress associated with ESLD and the process of awaiting liver transplant.
The specific aims are to: 1) examine the effects of the Uncertainty Management Intervention on patient outcomes of psychological distress, uncertainty management, symptom control, self efficacy for symptom management, and QOL compared to an attention control group receiving calls to discuss their disease experience; 2) explore the effects of the Intervention on caregiver outcomes of uncertainty management, self-efficacy for helping the patient manage symptoms, and better QOL compared to an attention control group; 3) identify characteristics of individuals for whom the intervention is particularly effective.
Waiting for a liver transplant under conditions of uncertainty is a harrowing experience for patients and caregivers, yet there have been few attempts to test nursing interventions for ESLD patients. The overall goal of this project is to provide these patients and their caregivers the tools to self-manage their complex concerns. The anticipated outcome is ESLD patients awaiting liver transplant benefit from the Uncertainty Management Intervention, thus providing new knowledge for practitioners and policy makers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Uncertainty Management Intervention
The Uncertainty Management Intervention will consist of six 30-minute phone calls with a study educator to discuss issues of psychological distress, uncertainty management, symptom control, self efficacy for symptom management, and quality of life.
Uncertainty Management Intervention
Six 30-minute telephone calls with a nurse to discuss emotional and physical aspects of liver disease and awaiting liver transplant
Comparison Conditions for Liver Disease
Six 30-minute telephone calls that provide structured education about liver disease.
Comparison Conditions for Liver Transplant
Six 30-minute telephone calls that provide structured education about liver disease.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Uncertainty Management Intervention
Six 30-minute telephone calls with a nurse to discuss emotional and physical aspects of liver disease and awaiting liver transplant
Comparison Conditions for Liver Transplant
Six 30-minute telephone calls that provide structured education about liver disease.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Receiving care at a Liver Clinic in the United States
* 18 years of age or older
* MELD greater than or equal to 11
* Able to read and speak English
* No major cognitive impairment
* Not a recipient of a prior transplant (any organ)
* Has a caregiver willing to participate
* 18 years of age or older
* Able to read and speak English
* Provides care to a patient meeting the above criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
NIH
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James Tulsky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University School of Nursing
Donald Bailey, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University School of Nursing
Annette Devito Dabbs, PhD, RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Pittsburgh
Paul H. Hayashi, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Laurel Williams-Salonen, RN,MSN,CCTC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Nebraska Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
The University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00007468
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.