Focus Groups to Determine Surrogates Views Regarding Patient Preference Predictors

NCT ID: NCT02898194

Last Updated: 2024-10-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-31

Study Completion Date

2020-07-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

Some people cannot make medical treatment decisions on their own. The people who make decisions on their behalf are called medical surrogates. Sometimes surrogates cannot predict which treatment course the person or their loved ones would have chosen. The surrogates often become distressed because of making these decisions. Researchers think a tool called a Patient Preference Predictor (PPP) may be able to make the process easier. The PPP would predict what treatment the person would want. This is based on treatment preferences of similar people in a similar circumstance. Researchers want to interview surrogates to explore their views on the PPP.

Objective:

To explore surrogates views on incorporating a PPP into shared medical decision-making.

Eligibility:

People 18 years or older who:

Have acted as a surrogate medical decision-maker within the past 3 years. This includes decisions about

treatment, medication, hospice care, hospital admission, or discharge.

Are not pregnant

Design:

Participants will be screened by meeting with clinicians in person or by phone to discuss the study.

Participants will take part in a focus group. This is a small group of people discussing their thoughts and opinions. This will last for about 2 hours.

Participants will be served a light meal.

Participants will provide information about themselves and their views. They will talk about their past experiences making medical decisions for someone. They will discuss how they felt about these decisions.

The PPP will be explained to participants. They will give their views on it.

The research team will audio record the focus group and take notes.

Participants will fill out questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current clinical practice relies on shared decision-making between clinicians and surrogates to make treatment decisions for patients who cannot decide on their own. This decision-making process is meant to promote medical care that accords with the patient s own preferences and values. However, empirical data suggest that this model faces two significant challenges. First, both surrogates and clinicians have trouble predicting which treatment course patients would have chosen. Second, given the nature of the decisions, surrogates often experience significant emotional distress as a result of making treatment decisions. To address these concerns it has been suggested that the shared decision-making process might be supplemented with a Patient Preference Predictor (PPP). A PPP would provide a prediction of which treatment a given patient would want based on the treatment preferences of similar patients in similar circumstances. The present study proposes to interview surrogates who have been involved in making decisions for an incapacitated patient to explore their perspectives on the PPP and how to incorporate it into medical decision-making for incapacitated patients..

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Normal Physiology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1/Patient Surrogates

Any eligible participant who have acted as a surrogate medical decision-maker.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Experience making at least one medical decision on behalf of an incompetent patient within the past 3 years. A medical decision for the purposes of this study is defined as making a decision in a context in which there was more than 1 feasible or reasonable option.
* Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to speak, understand, or read English
* The patient on behalf of whom the individual acted as surrogate is deceased for less than two months.
* In the view of the referring clinician, participation in the study is deemed excessively burdensome.
* Candidate for study is pregnant
* Court appointed surrogate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Wendler, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Elizabeths Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. How should treatment decisions be made for incapacitated patients, and why? PLoS Med. 2007 Mar;4(3):e35. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040035. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17388655 (View on PubMed)

Rid A, Wendler D. Use of a patient preference predictor to help make medical decisions for incapacitated patients. J Med Philos. 2014 Apr;39(2):104-29. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu001. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24526785 (View on PubMed)

Rid A, Wesley R, Pavlick M, Maynard S, Roth K, Wendler D. Patients' priorities for treatment decision making during periods of incapacity: quantitative survey. Palliat Support Care. 2015 Oct;13(5):1165-83. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514001096. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25273677 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-CC-0168

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

160168

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Uncertainty Management Intervention
NCT00938795 COMPLETED NA
Agent-Enhanced Document Explanation
NCT02668705 TERMINATED NA
Communication During Hospitalization About Resuscitation Trial
NCT02984124 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Reducing Missed Appointments
NCT06915480 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3