Low Dose Extended-release Epidural and Lumbar Plexus Block Compared to Lumbar Plexus Block for Total Hip Resurfacing
NCT ID: NCT00934661
Last Updated: 2018-09-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis:
In patients undergoing a Birmingham total hip arthroplasty (BHA), low dose EREM in conjunction with lumbar plexus block (LPB) will be better than lumbar plexus block alone in increasing proportion of patients who meet discharge criteria within 24 hours.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compare Epidural vs. Lumbar Plexus Analgesia After Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02493621
Pain Control in Hip Arthroscopy: Comparing Lumbar Plexus Versus Peri-capsular Injection
NCT03244631
Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty by Quadratus Lumborum Block
NCT03666260
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Lumbar Plexus Verses Periarticular
NCT02242201
Lumbar ESPB in Hip Replacement Surgery
NCT06282666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At Wake Forest University, the investigators have been using EREM, since late 2004, as part of multimodal analgesia in patients having gynecologic surgeries and hip arthroplasties. The investigators initially decreased our dosages from those recommended (15 mg for lower extremity surgery and 10-15 mg for abdominal surgery), because side effects (nausea, vomiting and hypotension) were felt to be limiting to recovery. The investigators now use 4-7.5 mg in most patients, with 7.5 mg being the exception and have achieved better results. For hip arthroplasties, the investigators currently use 4-5 mg and have performed two retrospective chart reviews on this use; both suggesting that this approach is efficacious. However, these doses have not been studied in a prospective, randomized, double blind trial. The investigators would like to evaluate the efficacy of this dose of EREM used as part of a multimodal regimen. The investigators will compare EREM 4 mg with lumbar plexus block versus lumbar plexus block alone, (providing the rest of our multimodal approach for both patients).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Extended Release Epidural Morphine
Four mg (0.4 ml) of EREM will be delivered to the epidural space and flushed with 1 ml of saline
Extended Release Epidural Morphine (EREM)
A single Four mg (0.4 ml)dose of EREM will be administered into the epidural space and flushed with 1 ml of saline
Placebo Group
The epidural injection will be a placebo consisting of 0.4 ml of saline followed by 1 ml saline flush
Placebo
A single epidural injection will be a placebo consisting of 0.4 ml of saline followed by 1 ml saline flush
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Extended Release Epidural Morphine (EREM)
A single Four mg (0.4 ml)dose of EREM will be administered into the epidural space and flushed with 1 ml of saline
Placebo
A single epidural injection will be a placebo consisting of 0.4 ml of saline followed by 1 ml saline flush
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Men and women 18-65 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Laboratory evidence of coagulopathy (platelet count less than 100,000 cells/microliter of blood, prothrombin time greater than 12.1 seconds, partial thromboplastin time greater than 30 seconds, or international normalized ratio of greater than 1.5)
* Allergy to morphine
* Obstructive sleep apnea
* Body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2
* Pregnant or lactating
* Severe renal or hepatic disease
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
EKR Therapeutics, Inc
INDUSTRY
Wake Forest University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pamela C Nagle, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00006969
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.