Hemodynamic Effect of Lumbosacral Plexus Blockade Versus Spinal Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT02544269

Last Updated: 2017-05-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-01

Study Completion Date

2017-01-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study evaluates the hemodynamic effect of lumbosacral plexus blockades versus spinal anesthesia for hip replacement. Half of participants will receive lumbosacral plexus blockade and the other half will receive continuous spinal anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients for total hip replacement will be randomized for surgical anesthesia with either lumbosacral plexus blockade or continuous spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive central venous, arterial and spinal catheters. Hemodynamics will be monitored with transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis. Perineural injection of study medicine around the lumbar and sacral plexus will be performed guided by ultrasound and nerve stimulation. Study medicine will be injected in divided doses in the spinal catheter. Treatment will be blinded using double-dummy technique. After the first intrathecal dose of study medicine, the hemodynamic response will be monitored for 60 minutes. Patients will then be transferred to the operating room, where total hip replacement will be performed in lumbosacral plexus blockade or spinal anesthesia according to randomization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Hip Replacement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lumbosacral plexus blockade

Peripheral nerve blockade of lumbar and sacral plexus with ropivacaine max 225 mg perineural

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lumbosacral plexus blockade with ropivacaine.

Continuous spinal anesthesia

Continuous spinal anesthesia with plain bupivacaine max 15 mg intrathecal

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Regional anesthesia with bupivacaine titrated to the lowest effective dose

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

Lumbosacral plexus blockade with ropivacaine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bupivacaine

Regional anesthesia with bupivacaine titrated to the lowest effective dose

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients for total hip replacement at Aarhus University Hospital
* Age \>= 50 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification score I-III
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of ability to cooperate
* Lack of ability to speak Danish
* Chronic pain, that demands opioid treatment. Not inkl. hip pain.
* Previous venous thromboembolic event
* Previous major back surgery
* Severe cardiopulmonary disease (NYHA class 4)
* Severe untreated hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mm Hg)
* Obesity (BMI \> 35 kg/m\^2)
* Pregnancy
* Allergy towards the used local analgetics
* Current treatment with amiodarone or verapamil
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Regionshospitalet Silkeborg

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Niels D Nielsen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aarhus University, Dept. of Clinical Medicine

Thomas F Bendtsen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Aarhus University Hospital, Dept. of Anesthesiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Center for Planlagt Kirurgi

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-003498-13

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HIP/FUSION#1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.