Lumbar Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block After Hip Arthroscopy

NCT ID: NCT02882633

Last Updated: 2019-06-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2018-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare lumbar plexus block to fascia iliac block done in adult patients who have undergone hip arthroscopy surgery. Visual analogue scores, opioid consumption, and quality of recovery 48 hours post operatively will be used for comparison.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

If the patient is willing to participate and signs the consent, he/she will be randomized to one of the two treatment groups:

1. Lumbar Plexus Block
2. Fascia Iliaca Block

The patient will undergo general anesthesia as by the attending anesthesiologist assigned to the case. No intraoperative restrictions will be required for this study. Once in the PACU, the patient will be assessed and if their pain score is ≥ 4 on the NRS, the patient will be randomized to a lumbar plexus block or fascia iliaca block.

Patients will be monitored during block performance with standard ASA monitors. All patients will receive 2 L of oxygen via a nasal cannula. Sedatives will be titrated to effect. Midazolam 1-2 mg, and fentanyl 50-100 mcg will be used for sedation.

The fascia iliaca block will be performed in a standard fashion as described2. The patient will be placed in a supine position. The ipsilateral groin will be prepped and cleaned with chlorhexidine. An ultrasound machine with a linear transducer covered with a sterile tegaderm will be utilized. The transducer is placed inferior to the inguinal ligament until the femoral artery is located. The probe is then moved laterally until the Sartorius muscle is seen. A skin wheal with 3ml of 1% lidocaine is made and a 2-inch blunt tip needle is inserted in plane. The needle is seen to pierce the fascia iliaca and 1-2 ml of 0.25% Preservative Free bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine is injected to confirm correct needle placement between the fascia iliaca and iliopsoas muscle. An injection will be deemed adequate if local anesthetic is seen to separate these two layers in a medial to lateral direction. A total of 30ml of the above solution will be injected.

The lumbar plexus block will be performed with the patient placed in a lateral position with the operative side facing up. An ultrasound machine with a curved transducer covered with a sterile tegaderm will be utilized. The ipsilateral hip and knee will be flexed to 90 degrees. The anatomy for the LP block will be localized using a modified transverse scan of the lumbar paravertebral area (PMTS). This technique is well described by Karmarkar et al.7 The target vertebral level will be identified by locating the lumbosacral junction (the gap of L5-S1) using a paramedian sagittal scan and then counting cranially to locate both the lamina and the transverse process of L3-L5. The transducer is then placed 4 cm lateral to the midline at the L3-4 level and directed medially to insonate the intervertebral foramen through the lumbar intervertebral space. A skin wheal is made at this site with 1% lidocaine. and a 4 inch blunt tip needle is introduced 4 cm lateral to the midline and just medial of the transducer after connecting it to a nerve stimulator set at 1.00 mA. The needle is slowly advanced under ultrasound guidance until engaged in the psoas compartment and a quadriceps twitch is elicited. The nerve stimulator is turned down until the twitch is abolished at 0.3mA or less. 1-2cmlof 0.25% Preservative free Bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine is injected slowly after negative aspiration. A total of 30ml will be injected. Spread will be confirmed with ultrasound.

All patients will receive prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during surgery. The protocol for prophylaxis against PONV includes administration of 4 mg of dexamethasone after induction of anesthesia and 4 mg of ondansetron 20 minutes before recovery from anesthesia. Dexamethasone is withheld if the patient has poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (DM). Uncontrolled DM will be defined as random blood glucose above 250 mg/dl.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Arthroscopy Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lumbar Plexus Block

Subjects will receive single shot local anesthetic, 30 ml bolus of bupivacaine, given preoperatively to help with postoperative pain

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

30ml bolus of bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Local anesthetic

Fascia Iliac Block

Subjects will receive single shot local anesthetic, 30 ml bolus of bupivacaine, given preoperatively to help with postoperative pain

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

30ml bolus of bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Local anesthetic

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

30ml bolus of bupivacaine

Local anesthetic

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Marcaine Sensorcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients18 years and older scheduled for hip arthroscopy surgery
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I -III
* Mentally competent and able to give consent for enrollment in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic opioid use (use of any opioid daily or on most days of the week for more than 3 months)
* Diagnosed peripheral neuropathy in the surgical lower extremity
* Allergy to study medications
* BMI \>42
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ignacio Badiola, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Univeristy of Pennsylvania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

822547Upenn

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.