Lumbar Plexus vs Quadratus Lumborum Block in Post-operative Pain Following Total Hip Replacement

NCT ID: NCT03801265

Last Updated: 2021-07-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-19

Study Completion Date

2020-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Lumbar Plexus (LP) block is currently used as the standard-of-care regional anesthesia technique to provide postoperative pain management after primary hip replacement surgery at UPMC Shadyside Hospital. However, the LP technique is complex and can be associated with potentially serious side effects, including nerve injury, major bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, and intrathecal injection of local anesthetic. In rare instances the LP block can also lead to motor blockade, interfering with early ambulation. There are several case reports of Quadratus Lumborum inter-fascial block (QL3) giving equally adequate pain relief after total hip replacement surgery, and this QL3 block is performed routinely at this institution. The benefits to inter-fascial administration of local anesthetic include the avoidance of theoretical nerve injury, bleeding and intrathecal anesthetic administration associated with the direct interaction between the nerve and the nerve block needle. The purpose of this study is to show that QL3 block is non-inferior to the standard-of-care lumbar plexus block and should be used more regularly in hip replacement surgery. The study will be conducted as a prospective, randomized (1:1), double-blind, non-inferiority, active-comparator trial. The investigators plan to enroll 40 subjects, 20 in each treatment group. This study will prospectively investigate the efficacy of QL3 versus Classic LP block for post-operative pain management in subjects undergoing primary, unilateral hip replacement surgery and prospectively compare QL3 versus Classic LP block in time to mobilization and physical therapy response. Primary outcome measures include pain at rest and with movement at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be time for first request for pain medication, total pain medications (narcotics and non-narcotic analgesics) given in 24 hours and the time of participant's ability to walk 100 feet as recorded by a physical therapist.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eligible patients will be approached for the study by the PI or Sub-I in the pre-operative area on their day of surgery. The anesthesiology investigator will speak with the patient about the study behind a closed drape and the patient will have adequate time to consider the consent and ask questions regarding risk factors associated with each type of block. Once consented, the patient will be randomized by computer generated random number to one of the two treatment groups. Once assigned the treatment allocation, only the clinician administering the block will be unblinded to the randomization outcome. If randomized to the LP block, an anesthesiologist on the Acute Interventional Perioperative Pain Service (AIPPS) will administer the block with this approach: Patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus position with side to be blocked facing upwards. Midline will be identified by palpating the spinous process. Intercristal line will be drawn connecting iliac crests. The point of needle insertion will be 4 cm lateral to the intersection of both lines. The transverse process will first contact with a finder needle. Subsequently an 18 gauge 10 cm insulated needle will be used and advanced until it contacted the transverse process. Needle will then be redirected cephalad or caudad and advanced 1 cm, until the quadriceps femoris twitch is obtained. Local anesthetic will then be injected after confirming a motor response between 0.3-0.5 milli amperes.If randomized to the QL3 block, an anesthesiologist on the Acute Interventional Perioperative Pain Service (AIPPS) will administer the block with this approach:Patient will be placed in a lateral position with the side to be blocked facing up. A low frequency transducer will be used to identify three layers of abdominal musculature, probe will be then moved posteriorly till the transverse abdominus aponeurosis is visualized, the QL muscle is then identified by tracing the aponeurosis posteriorly. The transducer is then moved more posteriorly to visualize the shadow of transverse process and the origin of QL muscle. Psoas muscle is then identified lying anterior to the QL muscle. A 22 gauge 8 cm is inserted in plane posterior to the probe and advanced intramuscularly through the QL to interfacial plane between QL and psoas major and local anesthetic is deposited. For both treatment groups, the local anesthetic used will be 100 mg 0.5% ropivacaine. After surgery, the patient will be followed by the blinded research team for incidence of adverse events, as well as the collection of the primary outcome measures. These include pain at rest and with movement at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery, time for first request for pain medication, total pain medications (narcotics and non-narcotic analgesics) given in 24 hours and the time of participant's ability to walk 100 feet as recorded by physical therapist. This information will be captured from the patient's electronic medical record.

Minor changes were made to the outcome measures after the original approval of this submission. This was only to clarify the specific measures from the more general descriptions in the original.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Lumbar plexus block vs Quadratus lumborum type 3 block
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The person who perform the block will be unblinded. The participants and the outcomes assessor will be blinded to the treatment allocations.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lumbar Plexus block

0.5% ropivacaine 100 mg (20 ml) will be injected

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lumbar plexus block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus position with side to be blocked facing upwards. Midline will be identified by palpating the spinous process. Intercristal line will be drawn connecting iliac crests. The point of needle insertion will be 4 cm lateral to the intersection of both lines. The transverse process will first contact with a finder needle. Subsequently an 18 gauge 10 cm insulated needle will be used and advanced until it contacted the transverse process. Needle will then be redirected cephalad or caudad and advanced 2 cm, until the quadriceps femoris twitch is obtained. Local anesthetic will then be injected after confirming a motor response between 0.3-0.5 milli amperes.

Ropivacaine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml (100 mg) will be injected for both groups.

Quadratus Lumborum type 3 block

0.5% ropivacaine 100 mg (20 ml) will be injected

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quadratus lumborum type 3 block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient will be placed in a lateral position with the side to be blocked facing up. A low frequency transducer will be used to identify three layers of abdominal musculature, probe will be then moved posteriorly till the transverse abdominus aponeurosis is visualized, the QL muscle is then identified by tracing the aponeurosis posteriorly. The transducer is then moved more posteriorly to visualize the shadow of transverse process and the origin of QL muscle. Psoas muscle is then identified lying anterior to the QL muscle. A 22 gauge 8 cm is inserted in plane posterior to the probe and advanced intramuscularly through the QL to interfacial plane between QL and psoas major and local anesthetic is deposited.

Ropivacaine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml (100 mg) will be injected for both groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lumbar plexus block

Patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus position with side to be blocked facing upwards. Midline will be identified by palpating the spinous process. Intercristal line will be drawn connecting iliac crests. The point of needle insertion will be 4 cm lateral to the intersection of both lines. The transverse process will first contact with a finder needle. Subsequently an 18 gauge 10 cm insulated needle will be used and advanced until it contacted the transverse process. Needle will then be redirected cephalad or caudad and advanced 2 cm, until the quadriceps femoris twitch is obtained. Local anesthetic will then be injected after confirming a motor response between 0.3-0.5 milli amperes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Quadratus lumborum type 3 block

Patient will be placed in a lateral position with the side to be blocked facing up. A low frequency transducer will be used to identify three layers of abdominal musculature, probe will be then moved posteriorly till the transverse abdominus aponeurosis is visualized, the QL muscle is then identified by tracing the aponeurosis posteriorly. The transducer is then moved more posteriorly to visualize the shadow of transverse process and the origin of QL muscle. Psoas muscle is then identified lying anterior to the QL muscle. A 22 gauge 8 cm is inserted in plane posterior to the probe and advanced intramuscularly through the QL to interfacial plane between QL and psoas major and local anesthetic is deposited.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ropivacaine injection

0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml (100 mg) will be injected for both groups.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients 18-90 years old
2. Primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty
3. BMI 20 - 36
4. Male and Female
5. All races

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient refusal
2. ASA class \> or = 4
3. Pregnancy
4. Any condition precluding patient going home with in 24 hours of surgery
5. Non-English speaking or inability to participate in the study
6. Patients with coagulopathy or on therapeutic anticoagulation
7. Chronic Steroid Use
8. Narcotic Addiction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sharad Khetarpal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sharad Khetarpal

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sharad Khetarpal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UPMC Presbyterian-Shadyside Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ilfeld BM, Ball ST, Gearen PF, Le LT, Mariano ER, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, Sessler DI, Enneking FK, Shuster JJ, Theriaque DW, Meyer RS. Ambulatory continuous posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks after hip arthroplasty: a dual-center, randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2008 Sep;109(3):491-501. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318182a4a3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18719448 (View on PubMed)

Weller RS, Gerancher JC, Crews JC, Wade KL. Extensive retroperitoneal hematoma without neurologic deficit in two patients who underwent lumbar plexus block and were later anticoagulated. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):581-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00044. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12552223 (View on PubMed)

Ilfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fb9507. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20889937 (View on PubMed)

Hockett MM, Hembrador S, Lee A. Continuous Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Pain in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2016 Sep 15;7(6):129-31. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000363.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27513972 (View on PubMed)

La Colla L, Ben-David B, Merman R. Quadratus Lumborum Block as an Alternative to Lumbar Plexus Block for Hip Surgery: A Report of 2 Cases. A A Case Rep. 2017 Jan 1;8(1):4-6. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000406.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28036319 (View on PubMed)

Adhikary SD, Short AJ, El-Boghdadly K, Abdelmalak MJ, Chin KJ. Transmuscular quadratus lumborum versus lumbar plexus block for total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective propensity score matched cohort study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul-Sep;34(3):372-378. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_335_17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30386022 (View on PubMed)

Børglum J, Moriggl B, Jensen K, Lønnqvist P, Christensen AF, Sauter A, Bendtsen TF. Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum blockade. British Journal of Anaesthesia 111:eLetters Supplement, 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Winnie AP, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z, Radonjic R: Plexus blocks for lower extremity surgery: New answers to old problems. Anesth Review 1974; 1:11

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Polania Gutierrez JJ, Ben-David B, Rest C, Grajales MT, Khetarpal SK. Quadratus lumborum block type 3 versus lumbar plexus block in hip replacement surgery: a randomized, prospective, non-inferiority study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Feb;46(2):111-117. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101915. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33177220 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO18120275

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Quadratus Lumborum Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05247255 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1