A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

NCT ID: NCT00912964

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2030 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-28

Study Completion Date

2010-04-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of once daily (qd) Mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Mirabegron 25 mg

Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Mirabegron tablets

Mirabegron 50 mg

Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Mirabegron tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mirabegron

Mirabegron tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

YM178 Myrebtriq

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
* Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥ 3 months
* Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
* Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
* Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
* Patient is using medications intended to treat OAB
* Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
* Patient has diabetic neuropathy
* Patient has evidence of urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
* Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
* Patient has severe hypertension
* Patient has participated in a clinical study within 30 days, or had participated in any previous study with mirabegron
* Patient had an average total daily urine volume \> 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
* Patient has serum creatinine of \>150 μmol/L, or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) \> 3x ULN
* Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Use Central Contact

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Homewood, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Atherton, California, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

San Bernardino, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Tarzana, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Madisonville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Watertown, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Garden City, New York, United States

Site Status

Kingston, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Wadsworth, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bethany, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brantford, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

North Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Granby, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus N, , Denmark

Site Status

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Holstebro, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Bad Ems, , Germany

Site Status

Eisleben Lutherstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Hagenow, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Henningsdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hettstedt, , Germany

Site Status

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Neunkirchen, , Germany

Site Status

Neustadt in Sachsen, , Germany

Site Status

Radebeul, , Germany

Site Status

Sangerhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Körmend, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Sopron, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Szentes, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Hamar, , Norway

Site Status

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Coslada, , Spain

Site Status

Getafe Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Gran Canaria, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Vic, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Huddinge, , Sweden

Site Status

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Karlshamn, , Sweden

Site Status

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Czechia Denmark Finland Germany Hungary Norway Slovakia Spain Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24246044 (View on PubMed)

Herschorn S, Barkin J, Castro-Diaz D, Frankel JM, Espuna-Pons M, Gousse AE, Stolzel M, Martin N, Gunther A, Van Kerrebroeck P. A phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to assess the efficacy and safety of the beta(3) adrenoceptor agonist, mirabegron, in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.077. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23769122 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=26

Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-007087-42

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

178-CL-074

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.