Study to Test the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

NCT ID: NCT00688688

Last Updated: 2024-11-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2792 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-25

Study Completion Date

2010-05-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is intended to test the safety, tolerability, efficacy of two doses of long term once daily (qd) treatment of Mirabegron in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder and secondly to compare these with active comparator.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who completed 178-CL-046 (NCT00689104) or 178-CL-047 (NCT00662909) or new patients could be enrolled in this study if eligible.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mirabegron 50 mg

Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets and matching tolterodine extended release (ER) placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets

Placebo to Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Mirabegron 100 mg

Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets and matching tolterodine ER placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets

Placebo to Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Tolterodine ER 4 mg

Participants received tolterodine ER 4 mg capsules and matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Extended release capsules

Placebo to Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mirabegron

Tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Tolterodine

Extended release capsules

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to Mirabegron

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to Tolterodine

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Myrbetriq YM178

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
* Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥ 3 months
* Patient experiences frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
* Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence, during the 3-day micturition diary period

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
* Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
* Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
* Patient has diabetic neuropathy
* Patient has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
* Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
* Patient has severe hypertension
* Patient has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to tolterodine, other anticholinergics, YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or lactose or any of the other inactive ingredients
* Patient has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days (90 days in the UK for all clinical studies except 178-CL-046)
* Patient had an average total daily urine volume \> 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
* Patient has serum creatinine \>150 umol/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) \> 3x ULN
* Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Central Contact

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Homewood, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Atherton, California, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Bernardino, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Tarzana, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Greenbelt, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Watertown, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

North Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

West Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Endwell, New York, United States

Site Status

Garden City, New York, United States

Site Status

Kingston, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Wadsworth, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bethany, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Woolloongabba, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Leper, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint-Truiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Markham, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

North Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Saint Denis, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Granby, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Point Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Mělník, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Štětí, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Paris, Cedex 10, France

Site Status

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Paris-Cedex12, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Aichach, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Ems, , Germany

Site Status

Bautzen, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Eisleben Lutherstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Ganderkesee, , Germany

Site Status

Hagenow, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Henningsdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hettstedt, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Muenchen-Bogenhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Neustadt in Sachsen, , Germany

Site Status

Oranienburg, , Germany

Site Status

Radebeul, , Germany

Site Status

Sangerhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Uetersen, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Sopron, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Reykjavik, , Iceland

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Mullingar, , Ireland

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Catanzaro, , Italy

Site Status

Genoa, , Italy

Site Status

Latina, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Naples, , Italy

Site Status

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Treviglio, , Italy

Site Status

Varese, , Italy

Site Status

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Enschede, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Winterswijk, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Drammen, , Norway

Site Status

Hamar, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Amadora, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Tomar, , Portugal

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Lasi, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

Skalica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Hatfield, , South Africa

Site Status

Lyttelton, , South Africa

Site Status

Paarl, , South Africa

Site Status

Pietermaritzburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Roodepoort, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Bilbao, , Spain

Site Status

Getafe, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Mataró, , Spain

Site Status

Miranda de Ebro, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Toledo, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Huddinge, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Skövde, , Sweden

Site Status

Sonkoping, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Frauenfeld, , Switzerland

Site Status

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chorley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Croydon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Northwood, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belarus Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chapple CR, Kaplan SA, Mitcheson D, Klecka J, Cummings J, Drogendijk T, Dorrepaal C, Martin N. Randomized double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 study to assess 12-month safety and efficacy of mirabegron, a beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist, in overactive bladder. Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.048. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23195283 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=25

Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007-001452-39

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

178-CL-049

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.