Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

NCT ID: NCT00689104

Last Updated: 2024-11-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2336 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-28

Study Completion Date

2009-03-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of Mirabegron against placebo and compare the efficacy and safety with active comparator in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets and matching tolterodine slow release (SR) placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo to Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Placebo to Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Mirabegron 50 mg

Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets and matching tolterodine SR placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets

Placebo to Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Mirabegron 100 mg

Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets and matching tolterodine SR placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets

Placebo to Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Tolterodine SR 4 mg

Participants received tolterodine SR 4 mg capsules and matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Capsules

Placebo to Mirabegron

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mirabegron

Tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Tolterodine

Capsules

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to Mirabegron

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to Tolterodine

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Myrbetriq YM178

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
* Subject has symptoms of overactive bladder (urinary frequency and urgency with or without urge incontinence) for ≥ 3 months
* Subject experiences frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
* Subject must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence, during the 3-day micturition diary period

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
* Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
* Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
* Subject has diabetic neuropathy
* Subject has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
* Subject receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
* Subject has severe hypertension
* Subject has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to tolterodine, other anticholinergics, YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or lactose or any of the other inactive ingredients
* Subject has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days (90 days in the UK)
* Subject had an average total daily urine volume \> 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
* Subject has serum creatinine \>150 umol/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) \> 3x ULN
* Subject has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Central Contact

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Auchenflower, , Australia

Site Status

Clayton, , Australia

Site Status

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Randwick, , Australia

Site Status

Woolloongabba, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Leper, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint-Truiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Mělník, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Štětí, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Aichach, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Ems, , Germany

Site Status

Bautzen, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Eisleben Lutherstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Ganderkesee, , Germany

Site Status

Hagenow, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Henningsdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hettstedt, , Germany

Site Status

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Muenchen-Bogenhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Neustadt in Sachsen, , Germany

Site Status

Oranienburg, , Germany

Site Status

Radebeul, , Germany

Site Status

Sangerhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Uetersen, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Nikaias-Piraeus, , Greece

Site Status

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Pápa, , Hungary

Site Status

Sopron, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Reykjavik, , Iceland

Site Status

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Mullingar, , Ireland

Site Status

Tralee, , Ireland

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Catanzaro, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Genoa, , Italy

Site Status

Latina, , Italy

Site Status

Magenta, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Naples, , Italy

Site Status

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Teramo, , Italy

Site Status

Treviglio, , Italy

Site Status

Varese, , Italy

Site Status

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Enschede, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Winterswijk, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Drammen, , Norway

Site Status

Hamar, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Amadora, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Tomar, , Portugal

Site Status

Viana do Castelo, , Portugal

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Lasi, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

Skalica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Hatfield, , South Africa

Site Status

Lyttelton, , South Africa

Site Status

Paarl, , South Africa

Site Status

Pietermaritzburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Bilbao, , Spain

Site Status

Esplugues de Llobregat-Barcelo, , Spain

Site Status

Fuenlabrada, , Spain

Site Status

Getafe, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Mataró, , Spain

Site Status

Miranda de Ebro, , Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Toledo, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Villarreal de Huerva, , Spain

Site Status

Borås, , Sweden

Site Status

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Skövde, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Frauenfeld, , Switzerland

Site Status

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chorley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Croydon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Northwood, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Austria Belarus Belgium Bulgaria Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Khullar V, Amarenco G, Angulo JC, Cambronero J, Hoye K, Milsom I, Radziszewski P, Rechberger T, Boerrigter P, Drogendijk T, Wooning M, Chapple C. Efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron, a beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist, in patients with overactive bladder: results from a randomised European-Australian phase 3 trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):283-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23182126 (View on PubMed)

Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar MI. Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37160401 (View on PubMed)

Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24246044 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=35

Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007-001451-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

178-CL-046

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.