Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder (NCT NCT00912964)
NCT ID: NCT00912964
Last Updated: 2024-11-21
Results Overview
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
2030 participants
Baseline and Week 12
2024-11-21
Participant Flow
After screening, 2030 patients took placebo run-in study drug in a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period. On completion of the run-in period, 1306 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo, mirabegron 25 mg or mirabegron 50 mg for 12 weeks.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
433
|
433
|
440
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set (SAF)
|
433
|
432
|
440
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set (FAS)
|
415
|
410
|
426
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set Incontinence (FAS-I)
|
262
|
254
|
257
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
367
|
387
|
386
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
66
|
46
|
54
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Eligibility criterion not met
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
15
|
18
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
11
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
20
|
12
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
5
|
3
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Taking exclusionary medications
|
7
|
4
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Medical History
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance with study procedures
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Violation of exclusion criterion
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but never received study drug
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=432 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=440 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Total
n=1305 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean volume voided per micturition
|
163.5 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.39 • n=5 Participants
|
165.4 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.24 • n=7 Participants
|
158.4 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 52.17 • n=5 Participants
|
162.4 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.33 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of micturitions per 24 hours
|
11.54 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.979 • n=5 Participants
|
11.66 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.117 • n=7 Participants
|
11.69 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.227 • n=5 Participants
|
11.63 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.108 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) per 24 hours
|
5.43 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.335 • n=5 Participants
|
5.54 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.622 • n=7 Participants
|
5.81 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.559 • n=5 Participants
|
5.60 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.508 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean level of urgency
|
2.36 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.550 • n=5 Participants
|
2.37 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.573 • n=7 Participants
|
2.41 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.556 • n=5 Participants
|
2.38 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.560 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours
|
1.82 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.332 • n=5 Participants
|
1.94 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.552 • n=7 Participants
|
2.03 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.528 • n=5 Participants
|
1.93 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.465 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Mean number of pads used per 24 hours
|
0.91 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.786 • n=5 Participants
|
0.79 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.449 • n=7 Participants
|
0.84 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.700 • n=5 Participants
|
0.85 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.666 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Urge Incontinence
|
126 participants
n=5 Participants
|
168 participants
n=7 Participants
|
169 participants
n=5 Participants
|
463 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Mixed
|
145 participants
n=5 Participants
|
129 participants
n=7 Participants
|
154 participants
n=5 Participants
|
428 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Frequency
|
162 participants
n=5 Participants
|
135 participants
n=7 Participants
|
117 participants
n=5 Participants
|
414 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Duration of OAB symptoms
|
91.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 96.82 • n=5 Participants
|
96.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 113.77 • n=7 Participants
|
92.7 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 97.88 • n=5 Participants
|
93.4 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 103.02 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.73 • n=5 Participants
|
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85 • n=7 Participants
|
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.22 • n=5 Participants
|
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.97 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
301 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
293 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
303 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
897 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
132 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
139 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
408 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
389 participants
n=5 Participants
|
394 participants
n=7 Participants
|
400 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1183 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
100 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was utilized.
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=254 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=257 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
-0.96 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.122
|
-1.36 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.124
|
-1.38 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.123
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
|
-1.18 micturitions
Standard Error 0.124
|
-1.65 micturitions
Standard Error 0.125
|
-1.60 micturitions
Standard Error 0.122
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
|
8.3 mL
Standard Error 2.23
|
12.8 mL
Standard Error 2.24
|
20.7 mL
Standard Error 2.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was not utilized in this analysis.
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=254 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=255 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
-0.62 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.120
|
-0.96 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.122
|
-1.13 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.122
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was not utilized in this analysis.
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=424 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
|
-0.78 micturitions
Standard Error 0.124
|
-0.96 micturitions
Standard Error 0.124
|
-1.14 micturitions
Standard Error 0.122
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=413 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.028
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.029
|
-0.29 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.028
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 urgency incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was utilized.
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=256 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=251 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
|
-0.95 urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.110
|
-1.31 urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.112
|
-1.33 urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.111
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 episode of urgency grade 3 or 4 at baseline. Last observation carried forward was utilized.
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=413 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
|
-1.35 urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.154
|
-1.68 urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.155
|
-1.94 urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.152
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N". LOCF was not used in this analysis.
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N= 377; 395; 399]
|
-1.09 micturitions
Standard Error 0.130
|
-1.52 micturitions
Standard Error 0.127
|
-1.53 micturitions
Standard Error 0.127
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N= 366; 387; 386]
|
-1.47 micturitions
Standard Error 0.122
|
-1.68 micturitions
Standard Error 0.119
|
-1.69 micturitions
Standard Error 0.119
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. The number of patients included at each time point is noted as "N". LOCF was not utilized.
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=254 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=257 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N= 236; 244; 241]
|
-1.04 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.117
|
-1.38 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.116
|
-1.39 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.116
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N= 231; 239; 232]
|
-1.08 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.120
|
-1.36 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.118
|
-1.43 Incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.119
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was not utilized in this analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 4 [N=415; 410; 424]
|
7.6 mL
Standard Error 1.85
|
10.6 mL
Standard Error 1.86
|
17.8 mL
Standard Error 1.83
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 8 [N=377; 395; 399]
|
9.8 mL
Standard Error 2.21
|
15.7 mL
Standard Error 2.16
|
17.9 mL
Standard Error 2.15
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Week 12 [N=366; 387; 386]
|
8.2 mL
Standard Error 2.41
|
13.6 mL
Standard Error 2.34
|
22.5 mL
Standard Error 2.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 urgency incontinence episode (grade 3 or 4) at baseline. LOCF was not utilized.
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=254 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=257 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N=256; 247; 249]
|
-0.63 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.107
|
-0.98 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.109
|
-1.12 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.109
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N=226; 232; 227]
|
-1.06 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.105
|
-1.32 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.104
|
-1.39 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.104
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N=231; 237; 236]
|
-1.02 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.101
|
-1.33 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.100
|
-1.39 Urgency incontinence episodes
Standard Error 0.100
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 episode of urgency grade 3 or 4 at baseline. LOCF was not utilized for this analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423]
|
-0.90 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.143
|
-0.97 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.143
|
-1.47 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.141
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398]
|
-1.17 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.162
|
-1.51 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.159
|
-1.73 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.158
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385]
|
-1.60 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.162
|
-1.72 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.157
|
-1.99 Urgency episodes
Standard Error 0.157
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was not utilized for this analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency
Week 4 [N=412; 409; 423]
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.025
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.025
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.025
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency
Week 12 [N=364; 385; 385]
|
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.030
|
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.029
|
-0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.029
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency
Week 8 [N=377; 393; 398]
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.029
|
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.028
|
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.028
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one nocturia episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.
Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N=362; 362; 376]
|
-0.30 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.059
|
-0.27 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.058
|
0.38 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.057
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N=329; 349; 354]
|
-0.45 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.059
|
-0.41 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.057
|
-0.44 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.057
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N=321; 342; 344]
|
-0.54 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.058
|
-0.50 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.056
|
-0.52 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.056
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=362; 362; 378]
|
-0.48 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.058
|
-0.49 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.058
|
-0.52 nocturia episodes
Standard Error 0.057
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one use of a pad at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.
The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Week 4 [N=145; 136; 136]
|
-0.72 pads
Standard Error 0.117
|
-0.59 pads
Standard Error 0.121
|
-0.81 pads
Standard Error 0.120
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Week 8 [N=131; 131; 128]
|
-0.97 pads
Standard Error 0.119
|
-0.79 pads
Standard Error 0.119
|
-1.16 pads
Standard Error 0.120
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Week 12 [N=129; 129; 124]
|
-1.06 pads
Standard Error 0.125
|
-0.89 pads
Standard Error 0.125
|
-1.17 pads
Standard Error 0.127
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=145; 136; 137]
|
-0.99 pads
Standard Error 0.118
|
-0.83 pads
Standard Error 0.122
|
-1.16 pads
Standard Error 0.121
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=254 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=257 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255]
|
28.2 percentage of participants
|
31.5 percentage of participants
|
36.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241]
|
41.9 percentage of participants
|
44.7 percentage of participants
|
41.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232]
|
42.0 percentage of participants
|
46.9 percentage of participants
|
47.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257]
|
39.7 percentage of participants
|
45.7 percentage of participants
|
47.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.
The percentage of participants with at least a 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=262 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=254 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=255 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=262; 254; 257]
|
59.2 percentage of participants
|
72.8 percentage of participants
|
70.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 4 [N=262; 254; 255]
|
46.6 percentage of participants
|
54.7 percentage of participants
|
61.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 8 [N=236; 244; 241]
|
62.7 percentage of participants
|
71.7 percentage of participants
|
71.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Week 12 [N=231; 239; 232]
|
61.5 percentage of participants
|
74.1 percentage of participants
|
71.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
Percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline to Final Visit in mean level of urgency at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 0.24 for mean level of urgency. Mean level of urgency was derived from the average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale which ranged from 0 (No urgency) to 4 (Urge incontinence).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=413 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency
|
36.6 percentage of participants
|
40.5 percentage of participants
|
44.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
Percentage of participants with a decrease from baseline to final visit in mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 1.54 for mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4). The mean number of urgency episodes was derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale where a score 3=severe urgency and 4=urge incontinence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=413 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes
|
44.6 percentage of participants
|
47.1 percentage of participants
|
57.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Week 8 [N=376; 389; 391]
|
-15.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
-17.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
-18.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Week 12 [N=360; 380; 378]
|
-17.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
|
-18.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
-19.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Week 4 [N=402; 406; 418]
|
-12.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
-13.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
-12.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=405; 407; 422]
|
-16.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
-17.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
-18.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as "N".
Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Week 4 [N=403; 408; 417]
|
8.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.73
|
11.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.73
|
9.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.72
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=406; 408; 419]
|
13.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
14.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.79
|
14.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Week 8 [N=373; 393; 390]
|
12.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
14.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
13.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Week 12 [N=360; 383; 377]
|
13.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.84
|
14.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
|
14.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
Week 12 [N=112; 118; 118]
|
0.6 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 14.42
|
0.7 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 15.63
|
-1.5 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 7.45
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=119; 122; 123]
|
0.6 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 14.01
|
0.7 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 15.37
|
-1.3 percent work time missed
Standard Deviation 7.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
Week 12 [N=123; 130; 128]
|
-11.6 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 26.44
|
-10.2 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 22.01
|
-13.0 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 23.89
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=130; 135; 134]
|
-11.5 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 26.09
|
-10.1 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 21.67
|
-13.1 percent impairment while working
Standard Deviation 23.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
Week 12 [N=110; 115; 118]
|
-14.1 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 26.57
|
-11.0 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 23.65
|
-13.3 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 24.45
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=117; 119; 123]
|
-13.8 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 26.18
|
-10.8 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 23.33
|
-13.3 percent overall work impairment
Standard Deviation 24.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) included patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
Week 12 [N=353; 366; 362]
|
-11.4 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 26.66
|
-12.3 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 26.10
|
-13.1 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 26.22
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=373; 376; 378]
|
-11.0 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 26.87
|
-11.9 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 26.18
|
-13.3 percent activity impairment
Standard Deviation 26.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> Some problems
|
39 participants
|
45 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> Some problems
|
16 participants
|
20 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> Missing data
|
6 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> No problems
|
22 participants
|
31 participants
|
36 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Some problems -> Missing data
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
No problem -> No problem
|
327 participants
|
310 participants
|
304 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> No problems
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> Confined to bed
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Confined -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> No problem
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
No problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Some problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Unable to wash or dress myself -> No problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Unable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
No problem -> No problem
|
389 participants
|
385 participants
|
403 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
No problem -> Some problems
|
5 participants
|
10 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
No problem -> Missing data
|
7 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Some problems -> No problems
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Some problems -> Some problems
|
6 participants
|
8 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Some problems -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Unable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Unable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Missing data -> No problem
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Missing data -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Missing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> Some problems
|
27 participants
|
27 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems -> Some problems
|
30 participants
|
35 participants
|
44 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> No problem
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems -> Missing data
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable to perform usual activities -> No problems
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable to perform usual activities-> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable to perform -> Unable to perform
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Unable to perform usual activities -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> Some problems
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> Unable to perform usual activities
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> No problem
|
313 participants
|
303 participants
|
293 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> Unable to perform usual activities
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
No problem -> Missing data
|
6 participants
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems -> No problems
|
35 participants
|
38 participants
|
51 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Some problems->Unable to perform usual activities
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> No pain
|
209 participants
|
200 participants
|
185 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> Moderate pain
|
34 participants
|
36 participants
|
41 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> Extreme pain
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
No pain -> Missing data
|
4 participants
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain -> No pain
|
58 participants
|
65 participants
|
75 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain -> Moderate pain
|
85 participants
|
92 participants
|
87 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain -> Extreme pain
|
5 participants
|
0 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Moderate pain ->Missing data
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> No pain
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> Moderate pain
|
9 participants
|
4 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> Extreme pain
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Extreme pain -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data-> No pain
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data -> Moderate pain
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data -> Extreme pain
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Not anxious
|
52 participants
|
50 participants
|
58 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Not anxious
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Extremely anxious
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Not anxious
|
239 participants
|
243 participants
|
225 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Moderately anxious
|
20 participants
|
29 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Extremely anxious
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Not anxious -> Missing data
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Moderately anxious
|
77 participants
|
74 participants
|
89 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Extremely anxious
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Moderately anxious -> Missing data
|
4 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Moderately anxious
|
6 participants
|
5 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Extremely anxious -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Not anxious
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Moderately anxious
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Extremely anxious
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Missing data -> Missing data
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 4 [N=399; 401; 411]
|
0.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.312
|
2.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.929
|
1.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.712
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 8 [N=368; 386; 383]
|
3.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.389
|
3.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.766
|
4.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.795
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Week 12 [N=359; 379; 375]
|
4.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.535
|
4.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.282
|
5.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.112
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=404; 406; 419]
|
3.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.076
|
4.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.082
|
4.96 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.225
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378]
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=376; 391; 395]
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Week 12 [N=357; 379; 371]
|
1.18 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.156
|
1.58 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.151
|
1.94 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.153
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=377; 389; 388]
|
1.05 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.154
|
1.54 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.152
|
1.88 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.152
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Final Visit (LOCF) [N=410; 410; 424]
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Week 4 [N=410; 410; 424]
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Week 8 [N=381; 394; 399]
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Week 12 [N=364; 386; 382]
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.0 Physician visits
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. This assessment was completed by English speaking patients in the United States only. LOCF was used for the Final visit analysis.
The Clinician Global Impression Scale (CGI) assessed the change in the patient's bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the physician at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=194 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=202 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Much Improved
|
48 participants
|
52 participants
|
58 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Minimally Improved
|
53 participants
|
59 participants
|
42 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Total
|
182 participants
|
188 participants
|
196 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Very Much Improved
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Much Improved
|
6 participants
|
6 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Minimally Improved
|
31 participants
|
32 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: No Change
|
126 participants
|
134 participants
|
148 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Minimally Worse
|
13 participants
|
9 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Much Worse
|
3 participants
|
5 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Very Much Worse
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Total
|
158 participants
|
175 participants
|
171 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Very Much Improved
|
13 participants
|
22 participants
|
28 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: No Change
|
32 participants
|
37 participants
|
41 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Minimally Worse
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Much Worse
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Very Much Worse
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Total
|
171 participants
|
183 participants
|
185 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Very Much Improved
|
13 participants
|
22 participants
|
30 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Much Improved
|
49 participants
|
54 participants
|
60 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Minimally Improved
|
58 participants
|
60 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: No Change
|
38 participants
|
41 participants
|
44 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Minimally Worse
|
6 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Much Worse
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Very Much Worse
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. This assessment was completed by English speaking patients in the United States only. LOCF was used for the Final visit analysis.
The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=194 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=202 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Minimally Improved
|
49 participants
|
57 participants
|
45 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Much Worse
|
8 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Total
|
188 participants
|
194 participants
|
202 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Very Much Improved
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Much Improved
|
14 participants
|
15 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Minimally Improved
|
48 participants
|
52 participants
|
42 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: No Change
|
105 participants
|
105 participants
|
124 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Minimally Worse
|
6 participants
|
11 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Much Worse
|
5 participants
|
5 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Very Much Worse
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Total
|
160 participants
|
176 participants
|
174 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Very Much Improved
|
18 participants
|
23 participants
|
37 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Much Improved
|
54 participants
|
57 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: No Change
|
26 participants
|
33 participants
|
42 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Minimally Worse
|
5 participants
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Much Worse
|
8 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Total
|
173 participants
|
185 participants
|
188 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Very Much Improved
|
18 participants
|
23 participants
|
39 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Much Improved
|
54 participants
|
60 participants
|
51 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Minimally Improved
|
52 participants
|
57 participants
|
49 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: No Change
|
35 participants
|
36 participants
|
45 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Minimally Worse
|
6 participants
|
7 participants
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. This assessment was completed by English speaking patients in the United States only. LOCF was used for the Final visit analysis.
The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in the patient's overall condition since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=188 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=194 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=202 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Total
|
188 participants
|
194 participants
|
202 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Very Much Improved
|
3 participants
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Minimally Improved
|
46 participants
|
47 participants
|
41 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: No Change
|
112 participants
|
115 participants
|
132 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Minimally Worse
|
6 participants
|
12 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Much Worse
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Very Much Worse
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Total
|
160 participants
|
176 participants
|
174 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Very Much Improved
|
19 participants
|
19 participants
|
36 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Much Improved
|
47 participants
|
60 participants
|
51 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Minimally Improved
|
50 participants
|
54 participants
|
47 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: No Change
|
33 participants
|
39 participants
|
38 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Much Worse
|
7 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Total
|
173 participants
|
185 participants
|
188 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Very Much Improved
|
19 participants
|
19 participants
|
38 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Much Improved
|
47 participants
|
62 participants
|
54 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Minimally Improved
|
53 participants
|
54 participants
|
49 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: No Change
|
42 participants
|
43 participants
|
43 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Minimally Worse
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Final Visit: Much Worse
|
8 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Baseline: Much Improved
|
13 participants
|
12 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Week 12: Minimally Worse
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a one point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a two point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=415 Participants
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=410 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=426 Participants
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395]
|
55.1 percentage of participants
|
52.7 percentage of participants
|
55.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Major Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378]
|
22.1 percentage of participants
|
23.6 percentage of participants
|
25.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Improvement: Week 12 [N=357; 381; 378]
|
56.0 percentage of participants
|
52.8 percentage of participants
|
55.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Major Improvement: Final Visit [N=376; 391; 395]
|
21.5 percentage of participants
|
23.0 percentage of participants
|
25.6 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Mirabegron 25 mg
Mirabegron 50 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 participants at risk
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=432 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=440 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis acute
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Investigations
Laparoscopy
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.23%
1/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral ischaemia
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.46%
2/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Grand mal convulsion
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemianopia homonymous
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Petit mal epilepsy
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Appendicectomy
|
0.23%
1/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
0.00%
0/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=433 participants at risk
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 25 mg
n=432 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
Mirabegron 50 mg
n=440 participants at risk
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
8.5%
37/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
11.3%
49/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
10.7%
47/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
3.2%
14/433 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
3.5%
15/432 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
5.7%
25/440 • Adverse events starting or worsening in the period from first double-blind study drug intake until 30 days after last double-blind study drug intake.
|
Additional Information
Medical Director, Global Medical Sciences
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Europe
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Institute and/or Principal Investigator may publish trial data generated at their specific study site after Sponsor publication of the multi-center data. Sponsor must receive a site's manuscript at least 30 days prior to publication to ensure that no confidential information of Sponsor is included in the document. Sponsor may delay the publication for an additional 60 days to seek patent protection.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER