Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH)

NCT ID: NCT00901212

Last Updated: 2012-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Heart failure is a major health problem in Canada. Recent advances in medical and device therapy have helped to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with this problem. Among these treatments, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has very recently been shown to be effective to improve functional class, quality of life and exercise tolerance of the patients with the most severe symptoms of heart failure and a prolonged duration of the QRS on the 12-lead Electrocardiography (ECG).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Resynchronization of the failing ventricle is currently achieved by pacing the left and right ventricles simultaneously with specialized electrodes and a cardiac stimulator. However, controversy persists concerning the optimal configuration for cardiac pacing in these patients. Right ventricular pacing alone has been shown to be deleterious in some patient populations. The benefits of biventricular pacing in heart failure patients may be due primarily to left ventricular stimulation and may, in some patients, be decreased by the presence of simultaneous RV stimulation. Preliminary data from our own animal work suggest that in the majority of cases, LV stimulation alone is better than RV stimulation, and that BiV stimulation represents an intermediary situation between LV and RV stimulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LV Pacing

left univentricular pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Device programming

Intervention Type DEVICE

6-month period

BV Pacing

biventricular pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Device programming

Intervention Type DEVICE

6-month period

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Device programming

6-month period

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patient must answer "yes"

1. Does the patient require an ICD or an ICD replacement?
2. Does the patient have a documented LVEF less than or equal to 35% measured in the previous 6 months (without major concomitant clinical event)?
3. Does the patient have a QRS duration \< 120 ms?
4. Is the patient in sinus rhythm?
5. Was the six-minute walk test distance less than 400 meters and limited by heart failure symptoms?

Exclusion Criteria

1. Does the patient have:

* Indication for permanent ventricular pacing?
* Chronotropic insufficiency?
* Second or third degree AV block, either persistent or intermittent?
* A pacemaker or an ICD which is paced in ventricular chamber more than 5% of the time?
2. Does the patient have a reversible cause of LV dysfunction such as post-partum cardiomyopathy, tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis or acute toxic cardiomyopathy (including acute alcoholic)?
3. Did the patient have myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery in the 6 weeks preceding the pre-implant visit?
4. Does the patient have a moderate or severe cardiac valve stenosis?
5. Is the patient's capacity to walk is limited by reasons other than heart failure symptoms (e.g., angina, intermittent claudication, severe lung condition or arthritis)?
6. Does the patient have severe coexisting illnesses making survival \> 6 months unlikely?
7. Is the patient pregnant and/or nursing?
8. Is the patient unable or unwilling to consent or to comply with follow-up requirements?
9. Is the patient participating in another clinical study potentially interfering with the present trial?
10. Does the patient have a resynchronization system in place?
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Montreal Heart Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bernard Thibault

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernard MD, Thibault

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Montreal Heart Institute Research Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

St-Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

QEII Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook & Women's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St-Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHUS-Fleurimont

Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHUM-Hôpital Hotel-Dieu

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sacre-Coeur Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Institut Univ de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Legris V, Thibault B, Dupuis J, White M, Asgar AW, Fortier A, Pitre C, Bouabdallaoui N, Henri C, O'Meara E, Ducharme A; EARTH Investigators. Right ventricular function and its coupling to pulmonary circulation predicts exercise tolerance in systolic heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):450-464. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13726. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34953062 (View on PubMed)

Thibault B, Ducharme A, Harel F, White M, O'Meara E, Guertin MC, Lavoie J, Frasure-Smith N, Dubuc M, Guerra P, Macle L, Rivard L, Roy D, Talajic M, Khairy P; Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (GREATER-EARTH) Investigators. Left ventricular versus simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex >/=120 milliseconds. Circulation. 2011 Dec 20;124(25):2874-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032904. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22104549 (View on PubMed)

Thibault B, Harel F, Ducharme A, White M, Frasure-Smith N, Roy D, Philippon F, Dorian P, Talajic M, Dubuc M, Gagne P, Guerra PG, Macle L, Rivard L, Khairy P. Evaluation of resynchronization therapy for heart failure in patients with a QRS duration greater than 120 ms (GREATER-EARTH) trial: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. Can J Cardiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;27(6):779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Jul 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21791363 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

42560370

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UCT-67914 (Greater Earth)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.