Comparison of 50% Tilt and Tuned Waveforms in Single-Coil Active Can Configuration
NCT ID: NCT00874445
Last Updated: 2019-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
77 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-03-31
2010-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Fixed Tilt and Tuned Waveforms in Right-sided Implants
NCT00873691
50/50% Tilt and Tuned Defibrillation Waveform
NCT01325922
Comparison of Right Ventricular Septal and Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients Receiving a CRT-D Device
NCT00833352
POWER (Pulse Width Optimized Waveform Evaluation Trial)
NCT00311181
Effect of Right Ventricular Lead Position on Defibrillation Threshold
NCT02844127
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Theoretical analysis has shown that difference between the tuned and 50% tilt waveforms is amplified at high impedance levels with tuned waveforms being superior (unpublished). Accordingly, this study has been designed to prospectively compare the DFT estimates with tuned and 50% tilt waveforms in left-sided, active pectoral defibrillation lead systems when the SVC coil has been turned OFF or is not part of the shocking circuit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ICD shocks programmed to Tuned Waveform
ICD shocks programmed to Tuned Waveform
ICD/ CRT-D
Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.
ICD shocks programmed to Fixed Tilt Waveform
ICD shocks programmed to Fixed Tilt Waveform
ICD/ CRT-D
Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ICD/ CRT-D
Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient is able to tolerate DFT testing.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient is pregnant.
* Patient is less than 18 years old.
* SVC coil was turned ON during DFT testing
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Gold, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Michael Gold
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gold M, Val-Mejias J, Leman RB, Tummala R, Goyal S, Kluger J, Kroll M, Oza A. Optimization of superior vena cava coil position and usage for transvenous defibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Mar;5(3):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
Natarajan S, Henthorn R, Burroughs J, Esberg D, Zweibel S, Ross T, Kroll M, Gianola D, Oza A. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S139-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00624.x.
Mouchawar G, Kroll M, Val-Mejias JE, Schwartzman D, McKenzie J, Fitzgerald D, Prater S, Katcher M, Fain E, Syed Z. ICD waveform optimization: a randomized, prospective, pair-sampled multicenter study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1992-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07070.x.
Gold MR, Val-Mejias J, Cuoco F, Siddiqui M. Comparison of fixed tilt and tuned defibrillation waveforms: the PROMISE study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):323-7. doi: 10.1111/jce.12041. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Gold MR, Yu Y, Singh JP, Birgersdotter-Green U, Stein KM, Wold N, Meyer TE, Ellenbogen KA. Effect of Interventricular Electrical Delay on Atrioventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Aug;11(8):e006055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006055.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRD 475
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.