Comparison of 50% Tilt and Tuned Waveforms in Single-Coil Active Can Configuration

NCT ID: NCT00874445

Last Updated: 2019-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

77 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2010-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the defibrillation efficacy between the 50/50% tilt biphasic waveform and the Tuned biphasic waveform in a single coil active can configuration.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There has been one prospective study that found some benefit of using tuned waveforms over 50/50% tilt waveforms.11 Other studies have failed to show much change in defibrillation efficacy with different duration biphasic waveforms. A vast majority of patients in these studies were tested with dual coil leads. Although dual coil leads can lower defibrillation thresholds, it is known that dual coil leads can make the lead extraction difficult, lead to venous obstruction and are more prone to failure. Results from a recent study showed that that a single coil configuration is adequate in a vast majority of patients when DFT testing was performed with tuned waveforms. This makes the use of single-coil leads during ICD/ CRT-D implants an attractive option.

Theoretical analysis has shown that difference between the tuned and 50% tilt waveforms is amplified at high impedance levels with tuned waveforms being superior (unpublished). Accordingly, this study has been designed to prospectively compare the DFT estimates with tuned and 50% tilt waveforms in left-sided, active pectoral defibrillation lead systems when the SVC coil has been turned OFF or is not part of the shocking circuit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sudden Cardiac Death

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ICD shocks programmed to Tuned Waveform

ICD shocks programmed to Tuned Waveform

ICD/ CRT-D

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.

ICD shocks programmed to Fixed Tilt Waveform

ICD shocks programmed to Fixed Tilt Waveform

ICD/ CRT-D

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ICD/ CRT-D

Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient meets standard indication for an ICD/ CRT-D and will be implanted with an FDA approved SJM ICD/ CRT-D and compatible defibrillation lead system in the left pectoral region.
* Patient is able to tolerate DFT testing.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has the pulse generator on the right side.
* Patient is pregnant.
* Patient is less than 18 years old.
* SVC coil was turned ON during DFT testing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Gold, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Michael Gold

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gold M, Val-Mejias J, Leman RB, Tummala R, Goyal S, Kluger J, Kroll M, Oza A. Optimization of superior vena cava coil position and usage for transvenous defibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Mar;5(3):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18313597 (View on PubMed)

Natarajan S, Henthorn R, Burroughs J, Esberg D, Zweibel S, Ross T, Kroll M, Gianola D, Oza A. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S139-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00624.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17302691 (View on PubMed)

Mouchawar G, Kroll M, Val-Mejias JE, Schwartzman D, McKenzie J, Fitzgerald D, Prater S, Katcher M, Fain E, Syed Z. ICD waveform optimization: a randomized, prospective, pair-sampled multicenter study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1992-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07070.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11139975 (View on PubMed)

Gold MR, Val-Mejias J, Cuoco F, Siddiqui M. Comparison of fixed tilt and tuned defibrillation waveforms: the PROMISE study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):323-7. doi: 10.1111/jce.12041. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23210764 (View on PubMed)

Gold MR, Yu Y, Singh JP, Birgersdotter-Green U, Stein KM, Wold N, Meyer TE, Ellenbogen KA. Effect of Interventricular Electrical Delay on Atrioventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Aug;11(8):e006055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006055.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30354310 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRD 475

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Acute Defibrillation Study
NCT02227121 TERMINATED NA