Comparison of Fixed Tilt and Tuned Waveforms in Right-sided Implants

NCT ID: NCT00873691

Last Updated: 2019-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

129 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2011-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the defibrillation efficacy between the 50/50% tilt biphasic waveform and the Tuned biphasic waveform in patients with right-sided implants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current era implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have high defibrillation efficacy. This has stimulated a debate about whether DFT testing should be performed at all.1-3 However, this dialog has primarily centered around left sided implants, a group that is characterized by a small incidence of high defibrillation thresholds (DFTs).

The mechanism of phase duration programming to improve DFTs would seem to be most effectively applied to a group of patients with a high incidence of high DFTs such as right sided implants. This study therefore aims to prospectively evaluate direct phase duration programming on DFTs in right sided implants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

ICD shocks programmed to Tuned Waveform

ICD

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intervention isn an ICD. Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.

2

ICD shocks programmed to 50% Tilt waveform

ICD

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intervention isn an ICD. Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ICD

Intervention isn an ICD. Patients in experimental group will have their ICDs programmed to Tuned waveform and those in the control group will have their ICDs programmed to Fixed Tilt waveform.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient meets standard indication for an ICD/ CRT-D
* Patient will be implanted with an FDA approved SJM ICD/ CRT-D that has a higher capacitance (maximum delivered energy - 36 J)
* Pulse generator will be implanted on the right-side
* Patient is able to tolerate DFT testing.
* RV lead will be placed in the RV apex or inferior septum

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is pregnant.
* Patient is less than 18 years old.
* SVC coil was turned ON during DFT testing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Niraj Varma, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Varma N, Efimov I. Right pectoral implantable cardioverter defibrillators: role of the proximal (SVC) coil. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Aug;31(8):1025-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01130.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18684259 (View on PubMed)

Natarajan S, Henthorn R, Burroughs J, Esberg D, Zweibel S, Ross T, Kroll M, Gianola D, Oza A. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S139-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00624.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17302691 (View on PubMed)

Varma N, Schaerf R, Kalbfleisch S, Pimentel R, Kroll MW, Oza A. Defibrillation thresholds with right pectoral implantable cardioverter defibrillators and impact of waveform tuning (the Tilt and Tune trial). Europace. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1810-1817. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw306.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27986795 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRD 442

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RIGHT: Rhythm ID Going Head-to-Head Trial
NCT00148954 COMPLETED PHASE4
Novel ICD Arrhythmia Detection Algorithm
NCT04981496 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING