Head Positions to Open the Upper Airway

NCT ID: NCT00869648

Last Updated: 2017-03-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ventilation during basic life support improves survival in cardiac arrest patients significantly. Unfortunately, this is in contrast to the willingness of potential rescuers to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation. For example, although healthcare professionals would perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation on a 4-year old drowned child in \>90% of cases, this likelihood would decrease to \~10% in the case of a young male unconscious patient in a San Francisco public bus. Possibly, lay rescuers would perform assisted ventilation more often if a simple ventilation device were available. However, both the willingness to perform assisted ventilation plus the ability to open and to maintain the airway patent are necessary to ensure efficient ventilation in an unconscious patient with an unprotected upper airway.

Since retention of skills after basic life support classes are notoriously low, a resuscitation tool should incorporate self-explanatory features to improve applicability, and to provide built-in safety. Thus, an option could be to ensure an open airway by the use of a built-in indicator within a ventilating device to confirm correct head extension. One possible approach may be to determine head position angles that make an open airway likely, and integrate these angles into a scale on a ventilating device; however, safe head extension needs to be determined first to prevent harm.

The purpose of this study is to determine head position angles and ventilation parameters reflecting neutral position, maximal extension and a position deemed optimal by an anaesthesiologist in patients undergoing anaesthesia induction for elective surgery in a first step to design a ventilating device to optimise ventilation of an unprotected upper airway. The investigators will ventilate 30 patients with a pillow under the head simulating ventilation in the operating theater, and 30 patients without a pillow under the head simulating ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Dentures will not be removed during assessment. After anaesthesia induction the head will be consecutively flexed in the three positions and measurements performed. Afterwards, general anaesthesia and surgery will ensue. The health risk for this extra minutes of mask ventilation is minimal.

The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences in head position angles and ventilation parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apnea Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neutralposition

Head placed in neutral position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neutral head position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After anaesthesia induction the head is placed in neutral position

Extension

Head placed in extension

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Extension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After anaesthesia induction the head is placed in extension

Anaesthesiologist's position

Head placed in position deemed optimal by an anaesthesiologist

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Anaesthesiologist's position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

after anaesthesia induction the head is placed in a position deemed optimal by the anaesthesiologist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Extension

After anaesthesia induction the head is placed in extension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Neutral head position

After anaesthesia induction the head is placed in neutral position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anaesthesiologist's position

after anaesthesia induction the head is placed in a position deemed optimal by the anaesthesiologist

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I and II

Exclusion Criteria

* Cervical spine pathologies
* Peripheral nerve deficiencies
* Body mass index \>40kg/m2
* Obvious primary or secondary craniofacial abnormalities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University Innsbruck

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peter Paal, PD MD MBA EDAIC EDIC

PD MD MBA EDAIC EDIC

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Paal, MD, DESA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University Innsbruck

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mitterlechner T, Paal P, Kuehnelt-Leddhin L, Strasak AM, Putz G, Gravenstein N, von Goedecke A, Wenzel V. Head position angles to open the upper airway differ less with the head positioned on a support. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22944550 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UN3371

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ventilation Monitoring in OHCA
NCT04988906 COMPLETED NA