Gasping Improves Long-term Survival After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
NCT ID: NCT02998749
Last Updated: 2016-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
584 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-07-31
2016-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Method The data were recorded using the Utstein protocol. Only anonymized data were used for analysis. The data were derived from the EMS registry of the Central Bohemian Region, which is the largest EMS in the Czech Republic. The study sample included all OHCA cases, of presumed cardiac origin, that where resuscitated by the EMS between 1st July 2013 and 30th June 2014 (n = 584). Two subsequent patient outcomes: (1) return of spontaneous circulation (defined as spontaneous circulation at hospital admission) and (2) six-month survival were assessed in patients with and without agonal breathing. Six-month survival data of OHCA patients of presumed cardiac origin was derived from administrative insurance registries or medical records of patients, with only aggregated data being available.
Factors that may influence the presence of agonal breathing, specifically BLS provision before a professional EMS team reached the patient and second, EMS team response times, were also examined. BLS provision by lay persons was reported by the first-on-scene EMS team as (yes/no) and phone assisted CPR was registered by the dispatcher as (yes/no). BLS was considered to have been provided if any of the following activities (1) resuscitation by a bystander, (2) phone assisted CPR, or (3) both were recorded as having been performed. The response time was calculated as the elapsed time between recorded activation of an EMS team and the on scene arrival time.
Other covariates such as age and sex were also available and analyzed. The initial difference in response time between the groups was assessed using the T-test. For categorical variables, the chi-square test was used. Simple and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess relationships between factors related to the presence of agonal breathing and ROSC. A p-value of \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charles University, Czech Republic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jiri Malek
Assoc. Prof.. MD, Ph.D.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Gasping1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id