Survey of Housestaff Attitudes Toward Patient Care and Safety
NCT ID: NCT00845052
Last Updated: 2017-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
674 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-07-31
2011-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Purpose: To investigate and track housestaff attitudes on patient care, patient safety, communication and overall quality within the institution.
Objective: To investigate, analyze and publish the results of this prospective study. The information obtained will help us and others understand whether proactive attempts to change housestaff culture can indeed change attitudes towards the better with regards to patient care and safety. It is assumed that improved attitudes ultimately translates into improved care and safety.
Methods: Each residency coordinator in each clinical department will be asked to distribute a survey, which has already been validated for this type of investigation, to each resident in the respective program (see attachment).
The Vice-President of Medical Affairs will provide a cover letter to help with the process. After a week, a reminder will be distributed by the coordinators to each resident asking them to fill out the survey. The surveys will be filled out anonymously. However, each participant will be asked to note their sex, department and year of postgraduate training. This process will be repeated every eight months until June of 2010. The Housestaff Quality council (HQC) has already distributed and collected this survey. The results of those surveys will be used in a retrospective part of this study. The results of (HQC) survey will be used to establish a baseline of the housestaff attitudes at the New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell.
Data will be stored on a password protected computer. The Institutional Review Board (IRB), Office of Human Research Protection and Food and Drug Administration and all appropriate federal oversight agencies may have access to those files.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Intensive Inpatient Attending Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety and Resident Education
NCT03318198
Nudges on Hospitalist Behavior and Patient Satisfaction
NCT05250778
Ethical Dilemmas in Clinical Practice: A Survey of European Physicians
NCT00352573
A Brief Intervention to Improve Cost-effective Resource Use Among Medicine Housestaff
NCT01303263
Implementing a Comprehensive Handoff Program to Improve Patient Safety
NCT01130987
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
First group of house staff
First group of house staff to be surveyed
No interventions assigned to this group
Second group of house staff
Second group of house staff to be surveyed
No interventions assigned to this group
Thirst group of house staff
Third group of house staff to be surveyed
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Members of housestaff working at New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Medical College of Cornell University Exclusion Criteria: Not meeting the inclusion criteria
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gregory Kerr, MD, MBA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0807009889
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.