Renin Profiling in Selection of Initial Antihypertensive Drug
NCT ID: NCT00834600
Last Updated: 2012-04-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
185 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-12-31
2011-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial to Compare the Effects of Either Telmisartan (40-80 mg PO Once Daily) or Ramipril (5-10 mg PO Once Daily) on Renal Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00240422
Survey to Assess Why People Are Not Responding to Treatment in Hypertension
NCT01071681
Hypertensive Ambulatory Trial to Compare the Efficacy of HCTZ and Lisinopril
NCT01258764
Multi-Omics to Predict the Blood Pressure Response to Antihypertensives
NCT05917275
Blood Pressure Lowering Ability and Safety of an Olmesartan and Amlodipine Based Treatment Regimen in Patients With Stage I and Stage II Hypertension
NCT00527514
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, through the Joint National Committee on the Detection, Treatment and Control of Hypertension (JNC 7) has recommended that most hypertensive patients begin therapy with a diuretic and sequentially add other classes of drugs until blood pressure is controlled. This approach appears to assume homogeneity in the mechanism by which BP is controlled in different patients. When this standardized strategy has been rigidly applied in Clinical Trials, a majority of patients generally require 2 or more agents to achieve blood pressure control.
The pioneering work of Laragh, Sealey and their colleagues, widely confirmed by others, suggests instead that heterogeneity, in fact, characterizes patterns of blood pressure control in populations. This heterogeneity can be exposed through assessment of the activity of the renin angiotensin system (RAS). Specifically, volume and vasoconstriction determine blood pressure control. Patients in whom volume predominates have suppressed RAS, and, conversely, those in whom vasoconstriction predominates will have an activated RAS. This can be simply and accurately determined by estimation of plasma renin activity (PRA).
It has been demonstrated that volume and vasoconstriction dependent hypertensive patients respond best to different drugs. By exploitation of the RAS it is possible to provide rational therapy to each patients according to the mechanism by which blood pressure is controlled. The result is that appropriate therapy can be both more effective and more efficient. A specific system the Laragh Method has been designed to translate this physiologically based paradigm into a practical scheme or patient management.
The purpose of this trial is to determine whether the Laragh Method will lead to better and more efficient blood pressure control in a general population of hypertensive patients than does the existing treatment strategy. The measure by which this hypothesis will be tested is percentage of hypertensive patients achieving blood pressure control on monotherapy.
The significance of this trial is enormous for both individuals and society. Some 50 million Americans have hypertension and more than 25 million are currently in treatment. If the Laragh Method leads to more parsimonious and effective care, it will mean literally millions of individual patients will be spared the burden of unnecessary polypharmacy. Moreover, the strain on health care costs associated with antihypertensive therapy will be redu
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HCTZ , ARB
Patients randomized to the Experimental Arm have initial drug choice determined by Plasma Renin Activity level. Low renin subjects are assigned to the diuretic hydrochlorothothiazide. Those with PRA \>.65 ng/hr are assigned to the angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan.
olmesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25mg OD, increased to 50 mg OD at 3 weeks. Olmesartan 20 mg OD, to be increased to 40 mg at 3 weeks. Amlodipine 5 mg, may be added at 6 weeks, if BP \>140 mmHg
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or olmesartan
HCTZ 25 mg, increasing to 50 mg at 3-4 weeks or Olmesartan 20 mg, increasing to 40 mg at 3-4 weeks. If blood pressure \>140/90 mmHg at 6 weeks, amlodipine 5 mg may be added
Conventional antihypertensive therapy
All patients randomized to Active Comparator Arm received hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, which is increased to 50 mg at 3-4 weeks. At 6 weeks, olmesartan may be added if BP \> 140 mmHg
olmesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25mg OD, increased to 50 mg OD at 3 weeks. Olmesartan 20 mg OD, to be increased to 40 mg at 3 weeks. Amlodipine 5 mg, may be added at 6 weeks, if BP \>140 mmHg
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or olmesartan
HCTZ 25 mg, increasing to 50 mg at 3-4 weeks or Olmesartan 20 mg, increasing to 40 mg at 3-4 weeks. If blood pressure \>140/90 mmHg at 6 weeks, amlodipine 5 mg may be added
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
olmesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25mg OD, increased to 50 mg OD at 3 weeks. Olmesartan 20 mg OD, to be increased to 40 mg at 3 weeks. Amlodipine 5 mg, may be added at 6 weeks, if BP \>140 mmHg
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or olmesartan
HCTZ 25 mg, increasing to 50 mg at 3-4 weeks or Olmesartan 20 mg, increasing to 40 mg at 3-4 weeks. If blood pressure \>140/90 mmHg at 6 weeks, amlodipine 5 mg may be added
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sustained systolic blood pressure between 140-180 mm Hg
* Free of antihypertensive therapy at randomization for at least 4 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
* Systolic blood pressure \>180 mm Hg
* Blood pressure \>180/105 mm Hg during the washout period
* Require antihypertensive agents for non-blood pressure indications
* Taking clonidine
* On a beta-blocker drug and have known or suspected coronary artery disease
* Documented history of a heart attack, new onset of chest pain, or a coronary revascularization procedure within the past year, congestive heart failure
* Serious intercurrent illness
* An active ulcer
* Have certain abnormal laboratory tests (elevated serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dl, transaminase \> 2 times upper limit of normal or active liver disease),
* Hypersensitivity, allergy or have an intolerance to angiotensin II receptor blockers (olmesartan), hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine
* Mentally or legally unable to participate
* Have or are currently abusing alcohol, have abused drugs within the past 2 years
* Have been in another drug study in the past month.
40 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Daiichi Sankyo
INDUSTRY
The Louis & Rachel Rudin Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael H. Alderman
Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael H Alderman, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine - GCRC
The Bronx, New York, United States
Jacobi Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Bronx Nephrology Hypertension, PC
The Bronx, New York, United States
Ralph Yung, MD
The Bronx, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ; Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003 Dec;42(6):1206-52. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. Epub 2003 Dec 1.
Laragh JH: Laragh's Lessons in Renin System Pathophysiology for Treating Hypertension and its Fatal Cardiovascular Consequences. Elsevier Science Inc.,2002,N.Y.
Laragh JH, Sealey JE. Renin system understanding for analysis and treatment of hypertensive patients: a means to quantify the vasoconstrictor elements, diagnose curable renal and adrenal causes, assess risk of cardiovascular morbidity, and find the best-fit drug regimen. Chapter 107, In: Hypertension:Pathophysiology Diagnosis and Management, 2nd Edition, Edited by JH Laragh and BM Brunner. Raven Press,Ltd.,New York 1995.
Sealey JE. Measurement of the hormones of the renin system in hypertensive patients. Clin Biochem. 1981 Oct;14(5):273-81. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(81)91000-6. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MMC #05-02-054
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
04-074
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.