Olmesartan Comparison to Losartan in Hypertensive Subjects

NCT ID: NCT00949884

Last Updated: 2011-03-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

941 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-31

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the FDA approved blood pressure medication olmesartan medoxomil compared to the FDA approved medication losartan potassium.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Olmesartan

Olmesartan 20 mg once daily for four weeks followed by 40mg one daily for four weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral tablets, once daily, at either 20mg or 40mg daily.

Placebo followed by Olmesartan

Placebo capsule of olmesartan once daily for 2 weeks, followed by olmesartan 20 mg once daily for two weeks, followed by olmesartan 40 mg for 4 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

olmesartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral tablets, once daily, at either 20mg or 40mg daily.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo oral tablets once daily for two weeks

Losartan

Losartan 50 mg once daily for four weeks, followed by losartan 100 mg once daily for four weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

losartan potassium

Intervention Type DRUG

losartan potassium oral tablet at either 50mg or 100 mg daily dose.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

olmesartan medoxomil

Oral tablets, once daily, at either 20mg or 40mg daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

placebo oral tablets once daily for two weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

losartan potassium

losartan potassium oral tablet at either 50mg or 100 mg daily dose.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Benicar Olmetec Cozaar

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males or females aged \> 18 years who are not institutionalized and have signed informed consent.
* Mean cuff seated diastolic blood pressure (BP) must be \> 95 mmHg and \< 115 mmHg and a mean cuff seated systolic BP must be \< 180 mmHg when measured at two consecutive qualification study visits during the placebo run-in phase.
* The difference in mean cuff seated diastolic BP must be \< 7 mmHg between two consecutive qualification study visits during the placebo run-in phase.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with an HbA1c ≥ 9.5% at Screening.
* Subjects with serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of olmesartan medoxomil and losartan potassium, including cardiovascular, renal (including the absence of one kidney), pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal (including clinically significant malabsorption), endocrine/metabolic (with the exception of non-insulin, dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1c \< 9.5% at Screening), hematologic/oncologic (including an active malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma), neurologic and psychiatric diseases.
* Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction, angina, coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery or heart failure within the last 12 months.
* Subjects with any history of New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF). A history of New York Heart Association Class I or II CHF may be exclusionary at the discretion of the Investigator.
* Subjects with a history of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the last 1 year.
* Subjects with clinically significant cardiac conduction defects, including second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, an accessory bypass tract, or any arrhythmia requiring medication.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Harbor City, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Pueblo, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Punzi HA, Lewin A, Li W, Chavanu KJ. Efficacy/safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in naive versus previously treated subjects with hypertension. Adv Ther. 2012 Jun;29(6):524-37. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0029-5. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22763801 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CS0866-A-U452

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.