Parallel-Group Comparison of Olmesartan (OLM), Amlodipine (AML) and Hydrochlorothiazid (HCTZ) in Hypertension

NCT ID: NCT00923091

Last Updated: 2019-01-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2689 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to determine the change in blood pressure from the administration of Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide triple combinations compared to dual combinations with Olmesartan/Amlodipine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Essential Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide 20mg/5mg/12.5mg

olmesartan medoxomil 20mg / amlodipine besylate 5 mg / hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide + placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. One hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet + one hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg placebo tablet taken once per day.

olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/12.5mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide + placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. One hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet + one hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg placebo tablet taken once per day.

olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/25mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. Two hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablets taken once per day.

olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/12.5mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 10 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. One hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet + one hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg placebo tablet taken once per day.

olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/25mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 10 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. Two hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablets taken once per day.

olmesartan/amlodipine 20mg/5mg

olmesartan medoxomil 20mg / amlodipine besylate 5mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day

olmesartan/amlodipine 40mg/5mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day.

olmesartan/amlodipine 40mg/10mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine

Intervention Type DRUG

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 10 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide + placebo

One olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. One hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet + one hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg placebo tablet taken once per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

Olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide + placebo

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. One hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet + one hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg placebo tablet taken once per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. Two hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablets taken once per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 10 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. One hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet + one hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg placebo tablet taken once per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine + hydroclororthiazide

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 10 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day. Two hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablets taken once per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine

One olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day

Intervention Type DRUG

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

olmesartan medoxomil + amlodipine

One olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg + amlodipine 10 mg combination oral tablet taken once per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Azor Azor Azor Norvasc Azor Azor Azor Azor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female subjects aged 18 years or older.
* Subjects with mean trough seated blood pressure (SeBP) ≥ 160/100 mmHg, (seated systolic blood pressure(SeSBP) ≥ 160 mmHg and seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) ≥ 100 mmHg) at Screening if not currently on antihypertensive medication (newly diagnosed subjects or subjects who are not taking any antihypertensive medication for at least 3 weeks); Or Subjects with mean trough SeBP ≥ 160/100 mmHg, SeSBP ≥ 160 mmHg and SeDBP ≥ 100 mmHg) after washout of prior antihypertensive medication in subjects who discontinued their previous antihypertensive medication.

The difference in mean SeSBP/SeDBP between the visit prior to randomisation and the randomisation visit must be ≤ 20/10 mmHg. Subjects not currently on antihypertensive (HTN) medication may meet this requirement at the screening visit (Visit 1) and the randomization visit (Visit 3). Subjects washing out of HTN medication must meet this requirement at least by Visit 2 (or Visit 2.1, if needed) and Visit 3. All subjects undergoing washout of their prior antihypertensive medication will have the opportunity to re-visit the study sites for additional visits during washout (Visits 2 and 2.1) to assess eligibility for randomisation.

* Subjects freely sign the informed consent form (ICF) after the nature of the study and the disclosure of his/her data has been explained.
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must be using adequate contraception (female of childbearing potential is defined as one who has not been postmenopausal for at least one year, or has not been surgically sterilised, or has not had a hysterectomy at least three months prior to the start of this study \[Visit 1\]). Adequate contraceptives include hormonal intra-uterine devices, hormonal contraceptives (oral, depot, patch or injectable), and double barrier methods such as condoms or diaphragms with spermicidal gel or foam.

Exclusion Criteria

* Female subjects of childbearing potential who are pregnant or lactating.
* Subjects with serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of the investigational products, including cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine or metabolic, haematologic or, neurologic, and psychiatric diseases. The same applies for immunocompromised and/or neutropenic subjects.
* Subjects having a history of the following within the last six months: myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina pectoris, percutaneous coronary intervention, heart failure, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), or transient ischaemic attack.
* Subjects with clinically significant abnormal laboratory values at Screening, including subjects with one or more of the following:

* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN).
* Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 3 times ULN.
* Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) \> 3 times ULN.
* Potassium above ULN (unless high value is due to haemolytic blood sample).
* Subjects with secondary hypertension of any aetiology such as renal disease, phaeochromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome.
* Subjects with contraindication to olmesartan, amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, or any of the tablet's excipients.
* Newly diagnosed subjects with a mean trough SeSBP \> 200 mmHg or mean trough SeDBP \> 115 mmHg or any subjects with bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 beats/min at rest documented by mean radial pulse rate \[PR\] or electrocardiogram \[ECG\]) at Screening (Visit 1) or immediately before taking Period I study medication (Visit 3).
* Subjects already taking four or more antihypertensive medications.
* Subjects with a mean trough SeSBP \> 145 mmHg or mean trough SeDBP \> 95 mmHg while taking three antihypertensive medications.
* Subjects with a mean trough SeSBP \> 160 mmHg or mean trough SeDBP \> 100 mmHg while taking two antihypertensive medications.
* Subjects with a mean trough SeSBP \> 180 mmHg or mean trough SeDBP \> 110 mmHg while taking one antihypertensive medication.
* Subjects with electrocardiogram evidence of 2nd or 3rd degree atrio ventricular (AV) block, atrial fibrillation, or other cardiac arrhythmia (requiring treatment).
* Subjects with severe heart failure (New York Heart Association stage III-IV), clinically significant aortic or mitral valve stenosis, uncorrected coarctation of the aorta, obstruction of cardiac outflow (obstructive, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) or symptomatic coronary disease.
* Subjects with clinical evidence of renal disease including reno-vascular occlusive disease, nephrectomy and/or renal transplant, bilateral renal artery stenosis, unilateral renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, or severe renal impairment as evidenced by CrCl of \< 30 mL/min calculated using the Cockcroft and Gault formula.
* Subjects with clinically relevant hepatic impairment.
* Subjects with biliary obstruction.
* Subjects with uncontrolled Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes defined as HbA1c \> 9.0%. Diabetics must have documentation of HbA1c within 6 months of the Screening Visit, or must have their HbA1c assessed prior to randomisation. Note: subjects with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes controlled with insulin, diet or oral hypoglycaemic agents on a stable dose for at least 30 days may be included.
* Subjects with a history of a wasting disease (e.g. cancer), autoimmune diseases, connective tissue diseases, major allergies or angioneurotic oedema.
* Subjects who require or are taking any concomitant medication which may interfere with the objectives of the study.
* Subjects on beta blockers or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for both hypertension and either ischemia, post-MI prophylaxis or tachyarrhythmias.
* Subjects with known malabsorption syndromes.
* Subjects with psychiatric or emotional problems, which would invalidate the giving of informed consent or limit the ability of the subject to comply with study requirements.
* Subjects with a history of alcohol and/or drug abuse.
* Subjects who have received any investigational agent within 30 days prior to Screening.
* Subjects who are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent or to participate satisfactorily for the entire study.
* Subjects with malignancy during the past 2 years excluding squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Subjects with signs or symptoms which could exacerbate the occurrence of hypotension such as volume and salt depletion.
* Subjects with any medical condition, which in the judgment of the Investigator would jeopardise the evaluation of efficacy or safety and/or constitute a significant safety risk to the subject.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Buizingen, , Belgium

Site Status

De Pinte, , Belgium

Site Status

Drongen, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Gilly, , Belgium

Site Status

Merksem, , Belgium

Site Status

Mouscron, , Belgium

Site Status

Tremelo, , Belgium

Site Status

Wichelen, , Belgium

Site Status

Burgas, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Veliko Tarnovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Benátky nad Jizerou, , Czechia

Site Status

Brodce, , Czechia

Site Status

Havířov, , Czechia

Site Status

Jičín, , Czechia

Site Status

Mladá Boleslav, , Czechia

Site Status

Moravská Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prachatice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Sokolov, , Czechia

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cloppenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Delitzsch, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Northeim, , Germany

Site Status

Simmern, , Germany

Site Status

Wallerfing, , Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Hódmezővásárhely, , Hungary

Site Status

Jászberény, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Orosháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Chieti, , Italy

Site Status

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

Foggia, , Italy

Site Status

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Sassari, , Italy

Site Status

Stradella Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Cēsis, , Latvia

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Jēkabpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Ogre, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Tukums, , Latvia

Site Status

Varakļāni, , Latvia

Site Status

Ventspils, , Latvia

Site Status

Deurne, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Lichtenvoorde, , Netherlands

Site Status

Lieshout, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Dębica, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Jastrzebia Zdroj, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Mielec, , Poland

Site Status

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Arad, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Piteşti, , Romania

Site Status

Ploieşti, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Banska Bysterica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratilslava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Považská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Rimavská Sobota, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Ferrol, , Spain

Site Status

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Petrel, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lutsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Simferopol, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zhytomyr, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Bulgaria Czechia Denmark Germany Hungary Italy Latvia Netherlands Poland Romania Russia Slovakia Spain Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marques da Silva P, Haag U, Guest JF, Brazier JE, Soro M. Health-related quality of life impact of a triple combination of olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorotiazide in subjects with hypertension. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Feb 21;13:24. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0216-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25879524 (View on PubMed)

Volpe M, de la Sierra A, Ammentorp B, Laeis P. Open-label study assessing the long-term efficacy and safety of triple olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy for hypertension. Adv Ther. 2014 May;31(5):561-74. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0117-9. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24760656 (View on PubMed)

Volpe M, Christian Rump L, Ammentorp B, Laeis P. Efficacy and safety of triple antihypertensive therapy with the olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide combination. Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Oct 1;32(10):649-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03261919.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22909147 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CS8635-A-E302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.