Follow-Up of Bladder Cancer Patients From the New England Study of Environment and Health
NCT ID: NCT00776178
Last Updated: 2020-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
68 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-10-17
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Bladder cancer often recurs after treatment and patient survival varies greatly.
* More knowledge is needed about factors that can help identify patients who are at greater risk of disease recurrence and progression to minimize the need for screening and to help guide treatment.
* The New England Study of Environment and Health (NESEH), conducted by the departments of health in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, the Dartmouth Medical School and the NIH, examined the relationship between health and environmental factors such as smoking, diet and water quality in New England. This study provides an opportunity to learn more about patients with bladder cancer.
* Before launching a full-scale follow-up study on bladder cancer, it is necessary to determine the feasibility of obtaining needed follow-up information from patients enrolled in the NESEH.
Objectives:
-To determine the completeness and quality of information about treatment, recurrence, and progression that can be obtained for patients from their medical records.
Eligibility:
-Participants from the NESEH study who are residents of Maine and who were diagnosed with bladder cancer between 2001 and 2003.
Design:
* Determine the vital status of NESEH bladder cancer patients.
* Select a sample of 40 living and 18 deceased patients.
* Interview patients or their next of kin by telephone for about 30 to 45 minutes to update exposure information, obtain names and addresses of all hospitals and physicians they have seen since diagnosis, and obtain authorization to access medical records.
* Obtain and abstract medical records.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Observational Study of Subjects Having Routine Recurrence Screening for Bladder Cancer
NCT00903240
Collecting and Studying Blood and Tissue Samples From Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Prostate or Bladder/Urothelial Cancer
NCT01050504
Clinical Evaluation of BCDx for Monitoring of Recurrence in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
NCT05982561
Bladder Cancer Patient-Reported Outcomes
NCT01090388
Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma
NCT04872036
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Bladder cancer is a highly recurrent disease with substantial variability in survival.
* Patients currently undergo repeated cystoscopy for many years after diagnosis.
* There is a need to identify prognostic markers of recurrence and progression to minimize the need for routine screening and to identify patients who should be treated more aggressively.
* The New England Study of Environment and Health (NESEH), a population-based case control study of 1,213 patients in Maine (ME), Vermont (VT), and New Hampshire (NH), provides an excellent opportunity study the clinical, host-genetic, and environmental determinants of prognosis.
* Before launching a full-scale follow-up study, we need to determine the feasibility of following a population-based case series and of obtaining patient-related (vital status, exposures) and tumor-related (recurrence, progression, pathology) information.
Objectives:
To determine:
* The completeness and quality of information that can be obtained for each patient. The most important issue is the extent to which medical records from private physicians will be needed, and whether private physicians are cooperative.
* Our ability to identify next-of-kin (NOK) of deceased patients.
* The proportion of patients (and NOK) that we can contact and enroll.
* The ability of NOK to provide information on exposures.
Eligibility:
-Bladder cancer patients from ME who participated in the original case-control study (ages 30-79, newly diagnosed with histologically-confirmed carcinoma of the bladder, including carcinoma in situ), excluding those diagnosed after 2003 (5 years of follow-up are needed).
Design:
* Conduct interviews with 40 living patients and the NOK of 9 deceased patients to update exposure information and find out where the patient received health care, the types of treatment received, and whether and when the disease recurred or progressed.
* For living patients or NOK that we are unable to locate (an estimated 10 living patients and 9 NOK), request medical records from health care providers (to see if physicians will provide records in the absence of an authorization form).
* Evaluate participant and physician response rates and the completeness of the medical history information obtained.
* We will proceed with the full study if we obtain sufficient medical information for 70% of the living patients.
* We will examine whether there were important issues related to deceased patients (e.g., NOK identification/enrollment, exposure assessment, access to medical records). If so, consider a simpler approach for this segment of the population (e.g., survival study based on NDI Plus and information available from the NESEH).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 30-79 years old at initial diagnosis
* Newly diagnosed with histologically-confirmed carcinoma of the urinary bladder (including carcinoma in situ) between September 1, 2001 and October 31, 2004
Exclusion Criteria
* 44 bladder cancer patients (7 percent) first diagnosed at one of seven hospitals located in remote areas of ME (Aroostook Medical Center, Calais Regional Hospital, Cary Medical Center, Down East Community Hospital, Houlton Regional Hospital, Northern Maine Medical Center, and Mount Desert Hospital); this is for cost considerations;
* Patients diagnosed fewer than 5 years before the feasibility study begins (i.e., after 2003)
30 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stella Koutros
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Cancer Institute (NCI), 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Herr HW. Natural history of superficial bladder tumors: 10- to 20-year follow-up of treated patients. World J Urol. 1997;15(2):84-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02201977.
Holmang S, Hedelin H, Anderstrom C, Johansson SL. The relationship among multiple recurrences, progression and prognosis of patients with stages Ta and T1 transitional cell cancer of the bladder followed for at least 20 years. J Urol. 1995 Jun;153(6):1823-6; discussion 1826-7.
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, Newling DW, Kurth K. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006 Mar;49(3):466-5; discussion 475-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.031. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-C-N007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
999909007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.