Evaluation of Non-Invasive Assays for the Detection of Urothelial Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00872495
Last Updated: 2025-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2002-09-30
2028-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Using Urine Tumor DNA to De-Intensify Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
NCT07187063
Molecular Analysis Of Bladder Cancer
NCT00871754
Care of the Urothelial Cancer Patient and Prospective Procurement of Urothelial Cancer Tissue
NCT02379429
Identifying Methylation Biomarkers for Monitoring Bladder Tumors
NCT00244205
Evaluating Bladder CAREā¢, a New Non-Invasive Urine Test, for Bladder Cancer Detection in Inconclusive Cases
NCT06870253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous publications from this Urology Department have introduced the idea of a non-invasive, molecular-based assay for the detection and monitoring of bladder cancer (Levesque et al. 1993; Fitzgerald et al. 1995). At the time of publication there was limited knowledge of molecular changes underlying the different clinical pathways outlined above and our assay was based on one gene (c-H-ras-1). In the last few years, it has become clear that activation events associated with FGFR-3 can be found associated with 40%-60% of low-grade, low-stage bladder tumors whilst p53 mutations are linked to a more aggressive phenotype progressing via the CIS pathway. Mutations found in the c-H-ras-1 gene can straddle both of these groups. We propose to assess the use of a multiple mutation-based assay, using DNA from exfoliated cells in the urine of patients, to establish the sensitivity and specificity in tumor detection compared to cystoscopy and cytology. In addition, we propose to isolate free-DNA for use in molecular assays. The remaining urine will be stored to evaluate biomarkers for the detection of tumor presence or progression using protein-based analyses.
Cancer Patient Group:
All patients harboring tumors and scheduled to have a cystectomy, cystoscopy,or nephroureterectomy will be eligible for this study. This will include patients at first presentation and those who are in follow-up. Urine samples collected at the time of a procedure will be obtained from catheterized urine in the operating room. Urine obtained in the clinic setting will be obtained via voiding, as with standard urine sample collection. We propose to collect urine from study participants who have a cystoscopy on each occasion that they visit the Urology Department regarding the treatment and follow-up of their disease. The urine will be collected at intervals over a two-year period.
Control Patient Group:
The cancer assays to be tested use DNA analysis and antibodies to specific proteins as well as functional assays for proteins to attempt to identify bladder tumor presence. It is important to know whether other changes, including kidney stones, cystitis etc. cause the release of the same DNA or proteins into the urine as was found in cancer patients. The frequency of false positive results will determine the utility of the assay in the cancer detection arena. A patient group of age-matched controls will be recruited from the aforementioned patient populations requiring a single urine donation at the time of their scheduled clinic visit.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the utility of emerging technologies in the detection of bladder tumor cells using non-invasive approaches utilizing voided urine samples. This will include methodologies than can establish the sensitivity of detection of specific mutations associated with bladder cancer progression and the utility of this approach in complementing cystoscopy and cytology. The mutation status of amplified DNA fragments will be established using multiple molecular techniques. We will also isolate free-DNA from urine and perform extended-PCR to ascertain the proportional representation of large DNA fragments i.e. \>1,500bp as an indicator of apoptotic activity and evaluate microRNA profiles from the urine samples.
Urine-borne exfoliated cells will be pelleted from urine collections using centrifugation and DNA/RNA will be extracted. The urine supernatant will be run over a DNA affinity column to capture free-DNA for analysis. Nucleic acids isolated from these procedures will be analyzed using PCR and various molecular technologies to establish the mutation status at different gene loci. The remaining urine will be frozen and used in protein detection assays using a panel of biomarkers with putative prognostic significance.
Detection of tumor presence will be compared in urine specimens undergoing mutational analysis and the current standard of treatment (cytology and cystoscopy together). As cytology is not performed on all patients, fewer urine specimens are expected in the cytology and cystoscopy group than in the mutational analysis group. Therefore a comparative analysis between these two groups will be performed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test where significance will be set at p\<0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Bladder Cancer Group:
Patients scheduled to have a cystectomy or cystoscopy of their bladder with possible removal or biopsy of bladder tumor or tissue.
Two urine samples collected at the time of the scheduled procedure:
One sample collected through voiding. The other sample collected from atheterized urine in the operating room. Additional urine samples may be collected at each follow up visit over two years. These samples will be obtained via voiding, standard urine sample collection.
No interventions assigned to this group
2
Control Group: Patients with no known evidence of bladder cancer. One urine sample will be collected through voiding, as with standard urine sample collection at the time of clinic visit.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Control Group: No known evidence of bladder cancer-one urine sample
* \> than 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lahey Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kimberly Rieger-Christ, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lahey Clinic, Inc.
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sidransky D, Von Eschenbach A, Tsai YC, Jones P, Summerhayes I, Marshall F, Paul M, Green P, Hamilton SR, Frost P, et al. Identification of p53 gene mutations in bladder cancers and urine samples. Science. 1991 May 3;252(5006):706-9. doi: 10.1126/science.2024123.
Levesque P, Ramchurren N, Saini K, Joyce A, Libertino J, Summerhayes IC. Screening of human bladder tumors and urine sediments for the presence of H-ras mutations. Int J Cancer. 1993 Nov 11;55(5):785-90. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910550516.
Fitzgerald JM, Ramchurren N, Rieger K, Levesque P, Silverman M, Libertino JA, Summerhayes IC. Identification of H-ras mutations in urine sediments complements cytology in the detection of bladder tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Jan 18;87(2):129-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.2.129.
Rieger-Christ KM, Mourtzinos A, Lee PJ, Zagha RM, Cain J, Silverman M, Libertino JA, Summerhayes IC. Identification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutations in urine sediment DNA samples complements cytology in bladder tumor detection. Cancer. 2003 Aug 15;98(4):737-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11536.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2002-061
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.