Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2008-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fractional Radiofrequency for Treatment of Acne Scars and Wrinkles
NCT05827510
Fractional CO2 Laser Combined With PRP Fluid Versus Gel in Treatment of Acne Scars
NCT04580758
Comparison of Picosecond Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser and Fractional Laser for the Treatment of Acne Scars
NCT03850925
Comparison of Efficacy Between Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency and Bipolar Radiofrequency for Acne Scar
NCT02207738
Evaluation of the Picosure 755nm Alexandrite Laser With Lens Array for the Treatment of Acne Scars
NCT02103127
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Study hypothesis
1. Reduction in acne scars based on blinded evaluation of before photos and the one and three month follow-up photos after four full face Ellipse Juvia with low density treatments with a fluency of 90-105 mJ/MTZ is statistically significant (5%).
2. The direct clinical blinded evaluated reduction in acne scars based on before photos and the patient in life, by the one and three month follow-up is statistically significant (5%)
3. Reduction in fine lines based on blinded evaluation of before photos and the one and three month follow-up photos after four full face Ellipse Juvia with low density treatments with a fluency of 90-105 mJ/MTZ is statistically significant (5%).
4. The direct clinical blinded evaluated reduction in fine lines based on before photos and the patient in life, by the one and three month follow-up is statistically significant (5%).
5. Reduction in pigmented disorders based on blinded evaluation of before photos and the one and three month follow-up photos after four full face Ellipse Juvia with low density treatments with a fluency of 90-105 mJ/MTZ is statistically significant (5%).
6. The direct clinical blinded evaluated reduction in pigmented disorders based on before photos and the patient in life, by the one and three month follow-up is statistically significant (5%).
7. Improvements in skin texture and pore size based on blinded evaluation of before photos and the one and three month follow-up photos after four full face Ellipse Juvia with low density treatments with a fluency of 90-105 mJ/MTZ is statistically significant (5%).
8. The direct clinical blinded evaluated reduction in skin texture and pore size based on before photos and the patient in life, by the one and three month follow-up is statistically significant (5%).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Fractional CO2 laser resurfacing
Fractional CO2 Laser
the treatment settings:
1. Pulse duration : 5 to 7ms depending on skin reaction
2. Spot Density: 49 MTZ/cm2 (Low density)
3. Power: 15 W = (75 - 105) mJ/MTZ
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fractional CO2 Laser
the treatment settings:
1. Pulse duration : 5 to 7ms depending on skin reaction
2. Spot Density: 49 MTZ/cm2 (Low density)
3. Power: 15 W = (75 - 105) mJ/MTZ
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged at least 30 year old
* Skin type: 1 - 4
* Degree of suntan: None - light
* Skin condition: visible acne scars
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with lesions with any clinical suspicion of being pre-cancerous or skin malignancies of any kind.
* Patients with skin diseases associated with Koebner phenomena.
* Patients who have used Botox or filler injection to the periorbital or perioral regions 12 months prior or during the study.
* Patients who have used topical retinoids, AHA under prescription or Vitamin C, 3 months prior to or during the study.
* Patients who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant and lactating women.
* Patients who have been exposed to sun within 2 week from date of treatment.
* Patients prone to hypertrophic scars or keloids
* Patients who have previously undergone laser resurfacing may not be suitable for yet another procedure.
* Patients undergoing oral retinoid therapy for acne in the past 6 months.
* Patients who suffer from any serious medical condition, including diabetes, bleeding diathesis, delayed wound healing or prednisolone intake.
* Patients with wound infections (herpes, other) on the day of treatment.
* Patients with moderate and severe inflammatory acne, Immunosuppressed patients, History of vitiligo.
* Patients with unrealistic concerns/expectations and inability to do the appropriate post-operative care.
25 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Woraphong Manuskiatti, M.D.
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Woraphong Manuskiatti, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, , Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fitzpatrick RE. Laser resurfacing today and the "cookbook" approach: a recipe for disaster? A comment. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2005 Dec;4(4):298-9; author reply 299-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2005.00208.x. No abstract available.
Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Satur NM, Tope WD. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin. Arch Dermatol. 1996 Apr;132(4):395-402.
Alster TS, Lupton JR. Erbium:YAG cutaneous laser resurfacing. Dermatol Clin. 2001 Jul;19(3):453-66. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(05)70286-2.
Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426-38. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20048.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1CIP7978- A02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SiEC 145/2551 (EC4)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.