Efficacy and Safety of 1565-nm Non-ablative Fractional Laser Versus Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Enlarged Facial Pores
NCT ID: NCT05360043
Last Updated: 2022-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-27
2022-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Safety and Efficacy of 1064-nm Picosecond Laser With Microlens Array for Pore Tightening; a Pilot Study
NCT04471948
Comparative Study of a 1064-nm Fractional Picosecond Laser Versus IPL in Facial Rejuvenation
NCT07122310
Short Pulse and Q-switched ND-YAG Laser With Topical Carbon Versus Fractional CO2 Laser for Enlarged Facial Pores
NCT04470466
A Study of the Efficacy of Erbium:YAG 2940nm in Combination With 1064nm Laser on Facial Rejuvenation
NCT03962621
Fractional Co2 Laser Versus Microbotox Injection in the Treatment of Wide Facial Pores: A Split Face Comparative Study
NCT05923996
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Various methods have been used to treat enlarged facial pores mainly focus on the possible causes. Treatment options include topical retinoic acid, oral isotretinoin, antiandrogen therapy, injections of botulinum toxin type A, chemical peeling, lasers, radiofrequency, and ultrasound devices. In recent years, various studies on laser treatments of facial pores are gradually increasing because of good efficacy and limited adverse reactions.
The 1064-nm LPNY has been widely used for facial rejuvenation. Many studies have confirmed that LPNY can reduce facial wrinkles and improve skin elasticity. Some researchers have used it to treat enlarged pores, and it has shown good results. Recently, 1565-nm NAFL is introduced for skin resurfacing, it has also been shown to be effective in treating enlarged facial pores. However, there are not enough clinical researches to confirm their efficacy, and no study has compared these two laser treatments before. So this is the first self-comparative study to compare the safety and efficacy of two lasers in the treatment of enlarged facial pores.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LPNY side
1064-nm LPNY (Gentle YAG, Candela ®, USA)
laser treatment
All subjects were treated with a 1565-nm NAFL on their left faces for one pass, A 34-40 mJ per microbeam laser was used, and density was 250-300 microbeam per cm2. Their right faces were treated with a 1064-nm LPNY for one pass. We used a spot size of 10 mm in diameter, an energy density of 45-50 J/cm2, pulse width of 300 microseconds, and a repetition rate of 2 Hz. 1064-nm LPNY was equipped with a dynamic cooling device (DCD), the parameter was set as 40/20/0 ms. A total of 5 treatments were carried out at 2-week intervals, and one follow-up session at two months after last treatment. Before each treatment, subjects were asked to wash their face with clean water, and no topical lotion was applied. For post-treatment care, all subjects were advised to use their own moisturizing cream and avoid sun exposure.
NAFL side
1565-nm NAFL(ResurFX mode, M22, Lumenis ®, Yokneam, Israel)
laser treatment
All subjects were treated with a 1565-nm NAFL on their left faces for one pass, A 34-40 mJ per microbeam laser was used, and density was 250-300 microbeam per cm2. Their right faces were treated with a 1064-nm LPNY for one pass. We used a spot size of 10 mm in diameter, an energy density of 45-50 J/cm2, pulse width of 300 microseconds, and a repetition rate of 2 Hz. 1064-nm LPNY was equipped with a dynamic cooling device (DCD), the parameter was set as 40/20/0 ms. A total of 5 treatments were carried out at 2-week intervals, and one follow-up session at two months after last treatment. Before each treatment, subjects were asked to wash their face with clean water, and no topical lotion was applied. For post-treatment care, all subjects were advised to use their own moisturizing cream and avoid sun exposure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
laser treatment
All subjects were treated with a 1565-nm NAFL on their left faces for one pass, A 34-40 mJ per microbeam laser was used, and density was 250-300 microbeam per cm2. Their right faces were treated with a 1064-nm LPNY for one pass. We used a spot size of 10 mm in diameter, an energy density of 45-50 J/cm2, pulse width of 300 microseconds, and a repetition rate of 2 Hz. 1064-nm LPNY was equipped with a dynamic cooling device (DCD), the parameter was set as 40/20/0 ms. A total of 5 treatments were carried out at 2-week intervals, and one follow-up session at two months after last treatment. Before each treatment, subjects were asked to wash their face with clean water, and no topical lotion was applied. For post-treatment care, all subjects were advised to use their own moisturizing cream and avoid sun exposure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Suiqing Cai, Ph.D
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Medicine
Hanzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Ying Wang, M.D
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wang Y, Zheng Y, Cai S. Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores. Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Oct;37(8):3279-3284. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03622-z. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-0073
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.