RESTART C0168Z05 Rheumatoid Arthritis Study

NCT ID: NCT00714493

Last Updated: 2013-09-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

203 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who are having an inadequate response to at least 3 months of treatment with etanercept or adalimumab in addition to methotrexate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 4, multi center, open-label, assessor blinded, switch study of infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who are receiving methotrexate and are having an inadequate response to their current treatment with etanercept or adalimumab. The last dose of etanercept must have been at least 1 week but not more than 2 weeks prior to the first infliximab study infusion. The last dose of adalimumab must have been administered at least 2 weeks but not more than 4 weeks prior to the first infliximab study infusion. The study will be conducted for 30 weeks and will include 200 patients. All eligible patients will receive 3 mg/kg infliximab infusions (drug given into a vein) at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter, if they achieve a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response on their current dose of infliximab. Patients who do not achieve a EULAR response will increase their dose from 3mg/kg to 5 mg/kg at week 14. Patients who do not achieve a EULAR response at week 22 will increase from either 3 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg or from 5mg/kg to 7 mg/kg. The last study infusion will take place at week 22. The last study visit for effectiveness evaluations will take place at week 26. A week 30 follow-up visit will be performed for adverse events and tuberculosis evaluations, health economics assessments, and review of concomitant medications. All patients who end the study early will be required to complete all assessments. Patients will receive 3 mg/kg infliximab infusions at weeks 0, 2, and 6. If patients achieve European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, they will remain on their current dose. Patients who do not demonstrate a EULAR response will increase their infliximab dose from 3 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg at week 14. At week 22, patients will also increase their infliximab dose from 3 mg/kg to 5mg/kg or from 5 mg/kg to 7mg/kg if they do not demonstrate a EULAR response.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

rheumatoid arthritis remicade infliximab Centocor etanercept enbrel adalimumab humira restart swollen joints tender joints.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

001

Infliximab3 mg/kg at week 0,2,6; Increase to 5mg/kg or 7 mg/kg based on EULAR response

Group Type OTHER

Infliximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

3 mg/kg at week 0,2,6; Increase to 5mg/kg or 7 mg/kg based on EULAR response

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Infliximab

3 mg/kg at week 0,2,6; Increase to 5mg/kg or 7 mg/kg based on EULAR response

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must have rheumatoid arthritis
* Patients must have greater than or equal to 6 tender joints and greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints
* Patients must have inadequate disease response to etanercept or adalimumab
* Patients must have received etanercept or adalimumab in combination with methotrexate for a minimum of at least 3 months prior to the screening visit. The last dose of etanercept must have been given at least 1 week but not more than 2 weeks prior to first infliximab infusion. The last dose of adalimumab must have been administered at least 2 weeks but not more than 4 weeks prior to first infliximab infusion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have a history of latent or active TB
* Have inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
* Have had a chronic or recurrent infectious disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schering-Plough

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, L.L.C.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Lewes, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Moline, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Freehold, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mayfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wexford, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Burke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Reston, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Graz-Eggenberg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Ontario, , Canada

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Montivilliers, , France

Site Status

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Holdenfelde, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Beer Yaakov, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Alkmaar, , Netherlands

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wigan, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium United States Austria Canada Finland France Germany Israel Netherlands Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fleischmann R, Goldman JA, Leirisalo-Repo M, Zanetakis E, El-Kadi H, Kellner H, Bolce R, DeHoratius R, Wang J, Decktor D. Infliximab efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis after an inadequate response to etanercept or adalimumab: results of a target-driven active switch study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Nov;30(11):2139-49. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.942416. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25050591 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C0168Z05

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR013879

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT01281449

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias