Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Combination With Glimepiride (a Sulphonylurea) in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

NCT ID: NCT00680745

Last Updated: 2013-10-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

597 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being carried out to see if dapagliflozin in addition to glimepiride (sulphonylurea) is effective and safe in treating patients with type 2 diabetes when compared to glimepiride alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Dapagliflozin efficacy safety sulphonylurea Type 2 diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

Glimepiride

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

metformin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

pioglitazone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Rosiglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

2

dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

Glimepiride

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

metformin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

pioglitazone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Rosiglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

3

dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dapagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

Glimepiride

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

metformin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

pioglitazone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Rosiglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

4

Placebo + Glimepiride

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Glimepiride

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

metformin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

pioglitazone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Rosiglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dapagliflozin

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Glimepiride

tablet oral 2.5, 5, or 10 mg total daily dose once daily 48 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

metformin hydrochloride

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Intervention Type DRUG

pioglitazone hydrochloride

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Intervention Type DRUG

Rosiglitazone

rescue medication oral dosing in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and clinical practice

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Amaryl Glucophage Actos Avandia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 2 Diabetes
* Treatment with a stable sulphonylurea monotherapy dose that is at least half the maximal recommended dose for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to study
* Inadequate glycaemic control, defined as A1C ≥ 7.0 % and ≤ 10%

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 1 Diabetes
* Hepatic (liver) impairment
* Renal (kidney) failure or dysfunction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Krzysztof Strojek, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Silesian Medical University3-Maja 13/15, 41-800 Zabrze; Poland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Blansko, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Bruntál, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Břeclav, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Hodonín, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava - Belsky Les, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pribram VIII, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Rakovník, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Semily, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Békéscsaba, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Csongrád, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyöngyös, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Makó, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Mosonmagyaróvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Siófok, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szentes, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Tát, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Cebu City, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Marikina City, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Pasig, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Bielsko-Biala, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Chojnice, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Chrzanów, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Ciechocinek, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Czechowice-Dziedzice, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gniewkowo, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Grudziądz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Iława, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Mrągowo, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Płock, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Ruda Śląska, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Zabrze, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Zielona Góra, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Żory, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Bucheon-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seongnam, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Uljeongbu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipropetrov'sk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India Czechia Hungary Philippines Poland South Korea Thailand Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shah M, Stolbov L, Yakovleva T, Tang W, Sokolov V, Penland RC, Boulton D, Parkinson J. A model-based approach to investigating the relationship between glucose-insulin dynamics and dapagliflozin treatment effect in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Apr;23(4):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/dom.14305. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33368935 (View on PubMed)

Strojek K, Yoon KH, Hruba V, Elze M, Langkilde AM, Parikh S. [Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with glimepiride]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013 Apr;138 Suppl 1:S16-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1305277. Epub 2013 Mar 25. German.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23529567 (View on PubMed)

Strojek K, Yoon KH, Hruba V, Elze M, Langkilde AM, Parikh S. Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with glimepiride: a randomized, 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Oct;13(10):928-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01434.x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21672123 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D1690C00005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id