Neuroma Injections to Treat Restless Legs Syndrome - RCT
NCT ID: NCT00656110
Last Updated: 2009-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-04-30
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain
NCT02597257
IV Lidocaine Infusion for Neuropathic Pain
NCT05731739
Resiniferatoxin for the Management of Refractory Morton s Neuroma Pain
NCT05695339
Long Term Outcome After Serial Lidocaine Infusion in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
NCT02217267
Efficacy Study of Botox to Treat Neuropathic Pain
NCT00527202
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
RLS and PLMS generally are lifelong conditions for which there is no cure. RLS is treated with medications targeting the brain and categories of drugs that have been used to treat symptoms (with varying success) include mainly dopaminergic drugs but also sedatives, anti-seizure drugs, and pain medications such as narcotics. Two dopaminergic drugs have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of RLS: ropinirole ("Requip") in 2005 and pramipexole ("Mirapex") in 2006. However such drugs are far from ideal because, in addition to the problem of side effects, some patients may not respond to these drugs or symptoms may only partially improve. Also, any improvement only occurs while continuing to take the drug, and finally, symptoms may sometimes become much worse after an initial period of improvement, a phenomenon called augmentation.
Foot neuromas are nerve entrapments ("pinched nerves") which form at points where the common interdigital nerves must stretch under ligaments between the metatarsal heads in the ball of each foot. Repeated irritation and damage to the nerves at those stretch points eventually results in fibrous thickening and enlargement of the nerve tissue into a lump called a neuroma. This most commonly involves a nerve in the ball of the foot between the third and fourth toes ("Morton's Neuroma"), but neuromas also often form at the entrapment/stretch point of the nerves between the second/third and fourth/fifth toes.
Neuromas may be completely asymptomatic in the foot or may cause variable degrees of unilateral or bilateral foot pain and numbness brought on or made worse by tight shoes, high heels, or prolonged walking or standing. When neuromas become more severely symptomatic, they may cause neuropathic symptoms such as burning, tingling, numbness, electric shock shooting pains, and hypersensitivity. Neuromas are treated with a series of injections (local anesthetic combined with either steroids and/or alcohol solution) given into the neuroma-containing space in the ball of the foot. It is believed that these injections serve to calm the nerve irritability which usually results in improvement or sometimes even complete resolution of the neuropathic symptoms (burning pain, etc.).
Previous studies by our group determined that many patients with neuropathic foot symptoms (burning, tingling, electric shocks, numbness, etc.) who had been previously diagnosed with "peripheral neuropathy," actually had neuromas in both feet as the cause of their symptoms. The causative role of neuromas in these patients was demonstrated by the fact that their chronic pain symptoms improved (in some cases markedly so) with standard neuroma injection treatment. In addition to improvement in their neuropathic foot pains, many patients also reported that they were sleeping much better. Such patients reported not only a decrease in their RLS-type leg restlessness but also that their spouse had noted a decrease in their PLMS-type nighttime leg movements, all as a direct result of their bilateral neuroma injections. These reports prompted further study of patients who had RLS/PLMS both with and without neuropathic foot pains.
Most patients with RLS/PLMS do not have major foot complaints. However such patients have been consistently found by us to have physical evidence of neuromas on examination of their feet and standard treatment of their bilateral neuromas usually resulted in prompt improvement of the symptoms related to RLS/PLMS along with the quality of their sleep. 15 such patients were studied intensively before and after neuroma treatment and 9 of these patients had complete relief of RLS symptoms for an average of over 2 months after a series of neuroma injections (Lettau LA, Gudas CJ. Bilateral Morton's neuromas as an etiology of restless legs syndrome. J SC Med Assoc 2005; 101: e341-e347).
However, the prevailing theory remains that RLS is of brain origin, so that a controlled study is being done to further support a foot neuroma origin of RLS by comparing the responses of two randomized groups of adults with RLS - one group to receive a series of 3 bilateral neuroma treatments (equal parts of 0.5% plain Marcaine and 2% lidocaine mixed with 0.8 mg Depo-medrol/4% absolute alcohol in a total injection volume of 1 ml injected weekly over 3 weeks) and a second "control" group to receive only placebo (normal saline) injections over a similar time period. Neither group will be told whether they are getting the actual treatment solution or placebo over the 3 weeks. After the 3 weeks are up, the patients who had received the placebo, will be told of their status and will be given the real injection treatments over the next 3 weeks. One follow-up visit (4 weeks after the last treatment injection) is planned to assess short term duration of treatment(s).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1-T
Treatment Group
equal parts of 0.5% plain Marcaine and 2% lidocaine mixed with 0.8 mg Depo-medrol/4% absolute alcohol in a total injection volume of 1 ml
Bilateral 3rd/4th common digital nerve injections with neuroma treatment mixture given weekly for 3 weeks
2-P
Placebo comparator
Normal saline - 1ml
Bilateral 3rd/4th common digital nerve injections with normal saline given weekly for 3 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
equal parts of 0.5% plain Marcaine and 2% lidocaine mixed with 0.8 mg Depo-medrol/4% absolute alcohol in a total injection volume of 1 ml
Bilateral 3rd/4th common digital nerve injections with neuroma treatment mixture given weekly for 3 weeks
Normal saline - 1ml
Bilateral 3rd/4th common digital nerve injections with normal saline given weekly for 3 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Evidence of bilateral 3rd/4th interspace neuromas by both physical examination and ultrasound criteria at initial evaluation
* Willingness and ability of patient to participate in initial weekly evaluation/neuroma treatment visits and subsequent periodic follow-up visits over a period of approximately 6-9 weeks.
* Off dopaminergic drug treatment (ropinirole-"Requip" or pramipexole-"Mirapex") starting 2 weeks prior to the initial foot injections and for the duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known or suspected obstructive sleep apnea
* Allergy to any of injection components (depo-medrol, lidocaine, marcaine, absolute alcohol)
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lowcountry Infectious Diseases
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lowcountry Infectious Diseases
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ludwig A Lettau, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lowcountry Infectious Diseases
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Southeastern Foot Specialists
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lettau LA, Gudas CJ. Bilateral Morton's neuromas as an etiology of restless legs syndrome. Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association 101: e341-e347, 2005
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LID-RLS-RCT-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.