IV Lidocaine Infusion for Neuropathic Pain

NCT ID: NCT05731739

Last Updated: 2023-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2023-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients who have undergone i.v. lidocaine infusions in the previous 2 years for suspected neuropathic pain of heterogeneous origin. The investigators hypothesize that the analgesic response to intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine will be bimodal with clear responders and clear non-responders. The investigators also hypothesize that more refractory patients, who have failed previous multimodal analgesic therapy, will be less likely to respond to i.v. lidocaine. The investigators goals are to report what percentage of patients will achieve relief, the degree of relief that can be expected, and identify the type of patients who will most likely to benefit from systemic lidocaine. The investigators secondary objective is to report the correlation between infusion rates and patterns of infusion rate adjustments with regard to efficacy and adverse effects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

HYPOTHESIS On the basis of investigators' clinical experience, The investigators hypothesize that the analgesic response to intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine will be bimodal with clear responders and clear non-responders. The investigators also hypothesize that more refractory patients, specifically patients with pain of longer duration and patients who have failed previous multimodal analgesic therapy, will be less likely to respond to i.v. lidocaine. To test the hypotheses, we will identify the distribution of pain relief in the enrolled cohort. The investigators will define responders as patients achieving Numerical Rating Score (NRS) reductions of 30% or greater based on literature defined criteria for meaningful reductions in pain scores.The investigators goals are to report what proportion of patients will achieve relief, the degree of relief that can be expected, and identify the type of patients who will most likely to benefit from systemic lidocaine. The investigators also hypothesize that degree of pain relief in a responder to i.v. lidocaine will be translated in the form of concomitant decrease in quantitative measures of PHQ-9 scales and Oswestry index scales. The investigators secondary objective is to report the correlation between infusion rates and patterns of infusion rate adjustments with regard to efficacy and adverse effects.

DESIGN AND SETTING The investigators will conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients who have undergone IV lidocaine infusions for suspected neuropathic pain. All patients will be recruited from the Pain Management Clinic at Henry Ford Health System.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS The investigators will secure approval from the Institutional Review Board and ethics committee of the institution. The investigators will review patients' information and their treatment data through the electronic medical record (EPIC) of the pain management clinic. The investigators will screen sequential charts of previous two years to identify patients who have undergone i.v. lidocaine infusions for Neuropathic Pain of heterogeneous origin. Inclusion criteria will include: neuropathic pain suspected by the board certified pain specialist assessing the patient based on the presence of allodynia, hyperalgesia, hyperpathia and hyperesthesia or hypesthesia. The exclusion criteria will include patients that refused subsequent i.v. lidocaine infusions or were lost to follow up.

DATA COLLECTION AND INDEPENDENT VARIABLES Independent variables examined will include the patient's age, sex, body mass index, indication, duration of pain problem, dates of treatment, dose, infusion time, adverse events, action taken as a result of an adverse event, duration of treatment, reason for discontinuation, pre and post infusion NRSs of pain, vital signs that were taken pre-infusion, during infusion and post-infusion, previous trials of alternative pain medication and current or previous substance abuse.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Initial analysis of patient's age, sex, pain severity, pain duration, number alternative medication tried, with comparison between lidocaine responders and non-responders will be done using Student t test or χ2 test as appropriate. All statistical tests will be 2-sided. A p value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Normality of data will be assessed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be calculated. SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) will be used for all analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RESPONDERS

The investigators will define responders as patients achieving Numerical Rating Score (NRS) reductions of 30% or greater based on literature defined criteria for meaningful reductions in pain scores

No interventions assigned to this group

NON RESPONDERS

When a patient failed to respond to the lidocaine infusion, they were given the option to have repeat infusion after four weeks. If no response was obtained, despite two infusions, this was considered as a failure of treatment and no further lidocaine infusions were conducted. Patient will be labelled as a non responder

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient with neuropathic pain
* patient enrolled for lidocaine infusion

Exclusion Criteria

* refusal to consent
* lost to follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Henry Ford Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gaurav Chauhan

RESIDENT ANESTHESIOLOGY

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

NABIL SIBAI, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Henry Ford Health Systems

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HFHS PAIN MEDICINE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuromas as the Cause of Pain
NCT02930551 COMPLETED NA
Ketamine and Neuropathic Pain
NCT02467517 UNKNOWN PHASE2
Neuropathic Pain Database
NCT00669006 COMPLETED