Single Ascending Doses Study of KLS-2031 in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

NCT ID: NCT04238793

Last Updated: 2024-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-16

Study Completion Date

2023-10-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Escalating single-dose design study to determine the safety, tolerability, and analgesic activity of KLS-2031

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a first-in-human (FIH), multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, escalating single-dose design study to determine the safety, tolerability, and analgesic activity of KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection to subjects aged 18 to 75 years with neuropathic pain due to LSR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort 1

Dose 1 (low dose: 1×1011 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KLS-2031

Intervention Type DRUG

KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Cohort 2

Dose 2 (medium dose: 1×1012 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KLS-2031

Intervention Type DRUG

KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Cohort 3

Dose 3 (high dose: 1×1013 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KLS-2031

Intervention Type DRUG

KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

KLS-2031

KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

To participate in the study, subjects must have met the following criteria at Visit 1 (Screening,

Day -56 to Day -15):

1. The subject signed a written informed consent for study participation including the 1-year double-blind treatment period and 1-year, open-label, long-term extension period.

Informed consent must have been obtained before any screening activities are conducted.
2. The subject, male or female, must have been between the ages of 18 and 75 years, inclusive.
3. The subject must have had a body mass index of ≤35 kg/m².
4. The subject must have had a diagnosis of pain due to LSR, with all of the following characteristics:

1. The subject perceived pain in 1 or both lower limbs at areas that are consistent with the area innervated by the lumbar 4 or 5 or sacral 1 (L4, L5, S1) nerve roots, with or without other sensory symptoms in the affected areas (typically, the pain may have been perceived in the buttock, thigh, calf, leg, foot, or toes). If both limbs were affected, pain had to be asymmetrical (ie, pain worse in 1 limb).
2. Pain in the leg radiated to below the knee.
3. Pain in the leg was worse during rest and/or at night and not solely present upon walking.
4. The history of the pain suggested that the cause of the LSR was due to the injury of the lumbosacral nerve root(s) by degenerative disease of the vertebrae in the lumbosacral spine or associated soft tissues (including the intervertebral discs).
5. The duration of the pain since onset was ≥6 months.
6. Based on clinical history, the intensity of the neuropathic (leg) pain had been stable during the 4-week period before screening (the pain may have fluctuated and may have been worse at night or at rest but was present on most days of the week).
5. Pain in the leg (worse affected leg) was worse than pain in the back.

2. Radicular pain at more than 1 spinal level, unstable spine, spondylolisthesis (\>Grade 1), spondylolysis, caudal equina syndrome, arachnoiditis, progressive neurological deficit, moderate to severe central spinal canal stenosis (congenital or acquired) from other origins, vertebral compression fracture(s).
3. Pain that was associated with a substantial somatic pain component in lower limbs or other parts of the body apart from the back (eg, non-neuropathic/musculoskeletal pain) or more than 1 cause or potential cause for pain symptoms in low limbs.
4. Any painful concurrent rheumatic disease such as, but not limited to, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or osteoarthritis that in the investigator's opinion would have prevented the subject from reliably delineating or assessing his/her pain due to LSR. Note: Any question regarding the acceptability of the etiology of the neuropathic pain was to be discussed with the medical monitor.
2. Had lumbar stenosis with pain present solely upon walking. Presence of lumbar narrowing on MRI was acceptable if the pain was not solely present upon walking.
3. In the investigator's opinion, the subject was unable to reliably delineate or assess his/her own pain by anatomical location/distribution (eg, the subject could not reliably tell the difference between his/her back pain and lower limb pain and could not rate the intensity of each separately).
4. The subject had pain in the lower limbs solely upon walking and not at rest.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The subject had:
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kolon Life Science

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Todd Bertoch, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

JBR Clinical Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kolon Investigative Site : CenExel JBR

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KS-GIG-001-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Central Pain Study for ABX-1431
NCT03138421 COMPLETED PHASE1
BMS-741672 for Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
NCT00683423 COMPLETED PHASE2