Single Ascending Doses Study of KLS-2031 in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT ID: NCT04238793
Last Updated: 2024-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-16
2023-10-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Intended to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters of BL-1021
NCT01121380
Treatment of Pain Associated With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy in Adults
NCT03727100
A Phase 1, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Safety and Tolerability Study Of Intravenous SBS-1000 in Healthy Adults
NCT05721287
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Ethosuximide in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.
NCT02100046
Long-Term Follow-up Safety of Clonidine Micropellets
NCT03776318
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort 1
Dose 1 (low dose: 1×1011 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo
KLS-2031
KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Placebo
Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Cohort 2
Dose 2 (medium dose: 1×1012 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo
KLS-2031
KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Placebo
Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Cohort 3
Dose 3 (high dose: 1×1013 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo
KLS-2031
KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Placebo
Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
KLS-2031
KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Placebo
Normal Saline (0.9%) administered by transforaminal epidural injection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Day -56 to Day -15):
1. The subject signed a written informed consent for study participation including the 1-year double-blind treatment period and 1-year, open-label, long-term extension period.
Informed consent must have been obtained before any screening activities are conducted.
2. The subject, male or female, must have been between the ages of 18 and 75 years, inclusive.
3. The subject must have had a body mass index of ≤35 kg/m².
4. The subject must have had a diagnosis of pain due to LSR, with all of the following characteristics:
1. The subject perceived pain in 1 or both lower limbs at areas that are consistent with the area innervated by the lumbar 4 or 5 or sacral 1 (L4, L5, S1) nerve roots, with or without other sensory symptoms in the affected areas (typically, the pain may have been perceived in the buttock, thigh, calf, leg, foot, or toes). If both limbs were affected, pain had to be asymmetrical (ie, pain worse in 1 limb).
2. Pain in the leg radiated to below the knee.
3. Pain in the leg was worse during rest and/or at night and not solely present upon walking.
4. The history of the pain suggested that the cause of the LSR was due to the injury of the lumbosacral nerve root(s) by degenerative disease of the vertebrae in the lumbosacral spine or associated soft tissues (including the intervertebral discs).
5. The duration of the pain since onset was ≥6 months.
6. Based on clinical history, the intensity of the neuropathic (leg) pain had been stable during the 4-week period before screening (the pain may have fluctuated and may have been worse at night or at rest but was present on most days of the week).
5. Pain in the leg (worse affected leg) was worse than pain in the back.
2. Radicular pain at more than 1 spinal level, unstable spine, spondylolisthesis (\>Grade 1), spondylolysis, caudal equina syndrome, arachnoiditis, progressive neurological deficit, moderate to severe central spinal canal stenosis (congenital or acquired) from other origins, vertebral compression fracture(s).
3. Pain that was associated with a substantial somatic pain component in lower limbs or other parts of the body apart from the back (eg, non-neuropathic/musculoskeletal pain) or more than 1 cause or potential cause for pain symptoms in low limbs.
4. Any painful concurrent rheumatic disease such as, but not limited to, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or osteoarthritis that in the investigator's opinion would have prevented the subject from reliably delineating or assessing his/her pain due to LSR. Note: Any question regarding the acceptability of the etiology of the neuropathic pain was to be discussed with the medical monitor.
2. Had lumbar stenosis with pain present solely upon walking. Presence of lumbar narrowing on MRI was acceptable if the pain was not solely present upon walking.
3. In the investigator's opinion, the subject was unable to reliably delineate or assess his/her own pain by anatomical location/distribution (eg, the subject could not reliably tell the difference between his/her back pain and lower limb pain and could not rate the intensity of each separately).
4. The subject had pain in the lower limbs solely upon walking and not at rest.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kolon Life Science
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Todd Bertoch, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
JBR Clinical Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kolon Investigative Site : CenExel JBR
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KS-GIG-001-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.