Myofascial Pain:Acupuncture Versus Trigger Point Injection Combined With Dipyrone and Cyclobenzaprine
NCT ID: NCT00635037
Last Updated: 2008-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-06-30
2006-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized study was performed at the Pain Clinic. METHODS: Thirty patients were divided into two groups: G1 received trigger point injection of 0.25% bupivacaine (1 ml/point) twice a week, 10 mg/day cyclobenzaprine and 500 mg dipyrone every 8 h. G2 was submitted to classical and trigger point acupuncture twice a week. The patients were asked to continue physical exercise. The following parameters were evaluated: pain intensity rated on a numerical and verbal scale, quality of life before and four weeks after treatment, and quality of analgesia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating the Minimum Number of Needling Required to Optimize Trigger Point Injections Outcome
NCT04732507
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Neurological Effects of Dry Needling in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT02179320
Manual Therapy Treatment for Myofascial Pain
NCT01381380
Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Trigger Point Injection and Twin Nerve Block in Chronic Myofascial Pain Patients
NCT03870191
Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Shortened Triceps Surae Muscle
NCT03273985
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
G1 (n=15)received trigger point injection of 0.25% bupivacaine (1 ml/point) twice a week, 10 mg/day cyclobenzaprine and 500 mg dipyrone every 8 h.
G2(n=15) was submitted to classical and trigger point acupuncture twice a week.
bupivacaine and acupuncture
* trigger point injection of 0.25% bupivacaine (1 ml/point) twice a week, 10 mg/day cyclobenzaprine and 500 mg dipyrone every 8 h.
* acupuncture twice a week
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bupivacaine and acupuncture
* trigger point injection of 0.25% bupivacaine (1 ml/point) twice a week, 10 mg/day cyclobenzaprine and 500 mg dipyrone every 8 h.
* acupuncture twice a week
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ranging in age from 18 to 65 year,
* pain intensity score of 3 or higher (rated on a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10)
Exclusion Criteria
* osteoarthritis,
* vertebral collapse,
* temporomandibular joint dysfunction,
* infection, -
* tumors,
* coagulopathy, -
* psychiatric disease,
* cognitive disorders.
* Patients who had used any type of analgesic or muscle relaxant agent 15 days before the study and those taking anticoagulants
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of São Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Federal University of São Paulo
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Miriam CB Gazi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Federal University of São Paulo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pain Setor of Federal University of Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
No grant
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ACP myofascial
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.