Investigating the Minimum Number of Needling Required to Optimize Trigger Point Injections Outcome

NCT ID: NCT04732507

Last Updated: 2026-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-20

Study Completion Date

2026-12-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Myofascial pain is a common condition in which patients may experience severe chronic pain. The source of this pain is typically the soft tissue. Current methods to address myofascial pain include a procedure called Trigger point Injections. This method involves identifying the areas of muscles that are causing the pain. The most common way to perform trigger point injection involves infiltrating the muscle with local anesthetics and then repeatedly passing the numbing needle in and out of the muscles (needling). This procedure is successful for most patients. However, there is great variability in the way needling is done. Some pain physicians perform 1-2 needle passes while other pain physicians may exceed 20 passes. There are currently no guidelines as to the number or amount of needle passes needed to achieve pain control. Furthermore, there is no study or research to shed light on the relationship between the number of needles passes and the degree and duration of pain relief coupled with patients' satisfaction.

This study is proposed to address this gap in knowledge. It is a prospective and randomized clinical trial that follows the standard of care. The investigators will recruit patients from The University-Banner Medical Center at Tucson, Arizona chronic pain clinic who are candidates for trigger point injections. The participants will be randomized into 3 different groups. Group one will receive 2 needle passes per identified trigger point. Group two will receive ten needle passes per identified trigger point. Group three will receive twenty needle passes per identified trigger point.

The investigators will analyze the data to understand the relationship between the number of needles passes and the degree of pain relief, improved functional capacity, and patients' satisfaction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic pain affects over 100 million Americans with an annual cost of about $600 billion/year. Almost half of the chronic pain conditions are attributed to musculoskeletal conditions.

Musculoskeletal pain is typically identified with palpation over tender areas initially identified by the patient and then verified by the physician. There are typically areas of muscles that when palpated, pain is experienced by the patient. These points are known as Trigger Points. There are several ways to manage trigger points. Muscle relaxers are the most common pharmacological approaches to manage trigger points, but they can cause significant sedation for patients. Some non-pharmacological methods such as physical therapy may also provide some relief of musculoskeletal pain. However, physical therapy requires active participation from patients in addition to lifestyle modifications. Additionally, for some patients, the severity of their musculoskeletal pain precludes them from effectively participating in physical therapy. For those patients, trigger point injections may provide enough relief to effectively participate in physical therapy. Trigger point injections is a procedure where an area identified is first injected with a local anesthetic then the needle is repeatedly inserted in and out (needling). The exact mechanism of action is not clear, but it does provide significant relief for most patients with musculoskeletal pain. Interestingly enough, while trigger point injections are a very common procedure and are performed by almost all pain physicians, there is great variability in the method it is performed. There is currently no clear guidance as to how light or intense the "needling" aspect of the procedure should be. On one end of the spectrum, some pain physicians perform 1-2 needle passes. On the opposite end of the spectrum, other pain physicians perform 40-50 or more needle passes. The literature is not very clear as to which is better in terms of the number of passes. In fact, the range of passes from one study to the other may account for some inconsistencies of the outcome associated with performing trigger point injections. The greater the number of passes, the greater the risk for possible side effects. On the other hand, pain relief may be directly proportional to the number of passes. The investigators currently do not have such information. The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between the intensity of the needling aspect of trigger point injections and pain relief. In this study, patients will undergo the typical standard of care treatment for musculoskeletal pain with randomization regarding the number of passes during needling. The investigators will evaluate the patient response using paper surveys over 2 months following their procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myofascial Pain Myofascial Trigger Point Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Depending on assignment, one group will receive 1-2 needle passes at each trigger point, the other will receive 10 and the third will receive 20.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

One to two needle passes

Receive 1-2 needle passes for needling at each trigger point

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.

Ten needle passes

Receive 10 needle passes for needling at each trigger point

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.

Twenty needle passes

Receive 20 needle passes for needling at each trigger point

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine

A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able to speak, read and write English
* Diagnosis of myofascial pain
* Failed conservative therapy or unable to participate in physical therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Serious mental illness that may not enable the patient to perceive pain changes
* History of conditions which may present as diffuse pain
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arizona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohab Ibrahim, PhD MD

Professor, Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohab Ibrahim, Md., Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arizona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Banner University Medical Center Multispecialty Services Clinic

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04122020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Magnesium Sulfate and Trigger Points
NCT06975813 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2