Investigating the Minimum Number of Needling Required to Optimize Trigger Point Injections Outcome
NCT ID: NCT04732507
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE2
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-20
2026-12-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is proposed to address this gap in knowledge. It is a prospective and randomized clinical trial that follows the standard of care. The investigators will recruit patients from The University-Banner Medical Center at Tucson, Arizona chronic pain clinic who are candidates for trigger point injections. The participants will be randomized into 3 different groups. Group one will receive 2 needle passes per identified trigger point. Group two will receive ten needle passes per identified trigger point. Group three will receive twenty needle passes per identified trigger point.
The investigators will analyze the data to understand the relationship between the number of needles passes and the degree of pain relief, improved functional capacity, and patients' satisfaction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Myofascial Pain:Acupuncture Versus Trigger Point Injection Combined With Dipyrone and Cyclobenzaprine
NCT00635037
The Impact of Dry Needling on Electrophysiological and Ultrasound-based Biomarkers for Myofascial Pain
NCT07270276
Trigger Point Injection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Low Back: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04704297
Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Trigger Point Injection and Twin Nerve Block in Chronic Myofascial Pain Patients
NCT03870191
A Study to Determine the Tissue Properties, Vascular Physiology and Biochemical Milieu of Myofascial Trigger Points
NCT04045457
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Musculoskeletal pain is typically identified with palpation over tender areas initially identified by the patient and then verified by the physician. There are typically areas of muscles that when palpated, pain is experienced by the patient. These points are known as Trigger Points. There are several ways to manage trigger points. Muscle relaxers are the most common pharmacological approaches to manage trigger points, but they can cause significant sedation for patients. Some non-pharmacological methods such as physical therapy may also provide some relief of musculoskeletal pain. However, physical therapy requires active participation from patients in addition to lifestyle modifications. Additionally, for some patients, the severity of their musculoskeletal pain precludes them from effectively participating in physical therapy. For those patients, trigger point injections may provide enough relief to effectively participate in physical therapy. Trigger point injections is a procedure where an area identified is first injected with a local anesthetic then the needle is repeatedly inserted in and out (needling). The exact mechanism of action is not clear, but it does provide significant relief for most patients with musculoskeletal pain. Interestingly enough, while trigger point injections are a very common procedure and are performed by almost all pain physicians, there is great variability in the method it is performed. There is currently no clear guidance as to how light or intense the "needling" aspect of the procedure should be. On one end of the spectrum, some pain physicians perform 1-2 needle passes. On the opposite end of the spectrum, other pain physicians perform 40-50 or more needle passes. The literature is not very clear as to which is better in terms of the number of passes. In fact, the range of passes from one study to the other may account for some inconsistencies of the outcome associated with performing trigger point injections. The greater the number of passes, the greater the risk for possible side effects. On the other hand, pain relief may be directly proportional to the number of passes. The investigators currently do not have such information. The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between the intensity of the needling aspect of trigger point injections and pain relief. In this study, patients will undergo the typical standard of care treatment for musculoskeletal pain with randomization regarding the number of passes during needling. The investigators will evaluate the patient response using paper surveys over 2 months following their procedures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
One to two needle passes
Receive 1-2 needle passes for needling at each trigger point
1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine
A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.
Ten needle passes
Receive 10 needle passes for needling at each trigger point
1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine
A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.
Twenty needle passes
Receive 20 needle passes for needling at each trigger point
1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine
A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine
A 5- or 10-ml syringe will be filled equally with 1% plain lidocaine and 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A 1.5-inch 25-gauge needle will be attached to the syringe. The needle will be carefully inserted at the first trigger point and 2 mls of the mixed local anesthetic will be infiltrated. At that point, the needle will be carefully inserted into the trigger point based on the group assigned. Once needling is done for the first trigger point, the process will be repeated in exactly the same fashion for the remaining points.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of myofascial pain
* Failed conservative therapy or unable to participate in physical therapy
Exclusion Criteria
* History of conditions which may present as diffuse pain
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Arizona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohab Ibrahim, PhD MD
Professor, Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohab Ibrahim, Md., Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Arizona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banner University Medical Center Multispecialty Services Clinic
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04122020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.