Hyaluronidase for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT02293083
Last Updated: 2014-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-04-30
2011-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Recent study suggested that the hyaluronan (HA) could be the basis of myofascial pain. HA within the deep fascia facilitates the free sliding of two adjacent fibrous fascial layers. If the HA assumes a more packed conformation, or more generally, if the loose connective tissue inside the fascia alters its density, the behavior of the entire deep fascia and the underlying muscle would be compromised.
The investigators anticipated that hyaluronidase could decrease the viscosity of HA near the muscle and fascia of trigger points. Meanwhile, hyaluronidase is thought to promote the spread of local anesthetic solution by hydrolyzing glycosidic bonds within HA. Hyaluronidase was shown to be effective in retro- and peribulbar block for ophthalmologic surgery or reducing tissue edema in dermatology, and adhesiolysis for some interventional pain managements.
However, the effect of the addition of hyaluronidase to local anesthetics during TPI has not been studied. The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy of TPI with the addition of hyaluronidase compared to local anesthetic alone on pain and quality of life in MPS patients.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The required sample size was determined by power analysis on the basis of a previous study. The primary outcome was pain intensity in the posterior neck and upper back after TPI using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS). The standard deviation of VNRS was assumed to be 20. Power calculations indicated that detecting 20 points difference in VNRS between the two groups (with α = 0.05 and β = 0.1) would require a sample of 29 subjects for each group. To account for dropouts, 33 subjects were recruited for each group.
Group L received TPI with a 3.2 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.9% normal saline. Group H received TPI with the same volume of solution supplemented with hyaluronidase (H-LASE®, 1500 iu, L\&H Pharm., Seoul, Korea) 600 iu/ml. The investigators monitored vital sign and any signs of complications such as bleeding, hematoma, allergic reactions for 30 minutes. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by one of the authors (J.W.C.) using VNRS. To reduce bias, this evaluator and the participants were not informed of the assigned group.
Patients' characteristics such as age, height, weight, BMI and pretreatment neck disability index (NDI) and brief pain inventory (BPI) were analyzed by independent t-test. The sex distribution was analyzed by the chi-square test. P values were corrected by Bonferroni's method. Pretreatment VNRS and the duration of pain were evaluated by the Wilcoxon two-sample test. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare changes in the VNRS over time between the two groups. Pre- and post-TPI changes in NDI and BPI were compared between the two groups with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the independent t-test, respectively. All analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. Significance was assumed for P values of less than 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lidocaine
Group L received trigger point injection with a 3.2 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.9% normal saline
trigger point injection
Hyaluronidase
Group H received trigger point injection with the same volume of solution supplemented with hyaluronidase (H-LASE®, 1500 iu, L\&H Pharm., Seoul, Korea) 600 iu/ml
trigger point injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
trigger point injection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 25-75 years
* Diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome affecting both trapezius muscles
Exclusion Criteria
* Anticoagulant medication or antiplatelet agent within 5 days before the study
* Analgesic medication, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tramadol, acetaminophen, or opioids within 5 days of the study
* Pain related to trauma within 6 months before the study
* History of cervical or shoulder surgery
* TPI within 3 months in the same region
* Fibromyalgia
* Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
* Obesity, defined as body mass index of 27.5 or higher
* Other medical or psychological conditions (cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, endocrine disease, major depression, schizophrenia)
25 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ji Won Choi
clinical fellowship
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201003046001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id