REmote MOnitoring Transmission Evaluation of IPGs

NCT ID: NCT00631709

Last Updated: 2018-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential clinical and economic benefits of using CareLink remote management for pacemaker follow-up.

Study Objectives include:

1. To determine clinician perceived quality of care for CareLink remote follow-up.
2. To determine patient satisfaction with CareLink follow-up.
3. To estimate the time required to perform patient follow-up via CareLink remote transmissions.
4. To determine the percentage of regular CareLink follow-ups that do not require further in-clinic review of the patient.
5. To estimate potential patient cost avoidance for one year of follow up incorporating CareLink.
6. To evaluate compliance to scheduled CareLink transmissions with the remote management system

This is a non-randomized, multi-center, prospective study in which 120 patients who have a pacemaker are enrolled into the study and receive a CareLink monitor. Patients will replace their regularly scheduled pacemaker clinic follow-up visits with a CareLink remote transmission for 12months.

Patients will require a test transmission within 1 month after they receive their CareLink monitor. Afterwards, patients are followed via CareLink transmissions as per their usual clinic schedule for 12 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pacemaker

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Pacemaker Patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CareLink Remote Monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

Substitution of CareLink Remote Monitoring of Pacemakers for in-clinic pacemaker follow-up visits

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CareLink Remote Monitoring

Substitution of CareLink Remote Monitoring of Pacemakers for in-clinic pacemaker follow-up visits

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have received a market released Medtronic pacemaker with automatic threshold management features for all active leads.
* Patients who have been implanted with their current pacemaker for at least 3 months.
* Patients who are willing, or who have caregivers willing, to use the Medtronic CareLink Monitor.
* Patients who are willing and able to sign an IRB/MEC approved patient informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients participating in another study that would affect the objectives of this study
* Patients who have already previously used a Medtronic CareLink Monitor.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kelowna General Hospital

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Southlake Regional Hospital

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHUQ, L'Hotel Dieu de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REMOTE-IPG 2008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Project My Heart Your Heart: Pacemaker Reuse
NCT04016870 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA