Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Objectives include:
1. To determine clinician perceived quality of care for CareLink remote follow-up.
2. To determine patient satisfaction with CareLink follow-up.
3. To estimate the time required to perform patient follow-up via CareLink remote transmissions.
4. To determine the percentage of regular CareLink follow-ups that do not require further in-clinic review of the patient.
5. To estimate potential patient cost avoidance for one year of follow up incorporating CareLink.
6. To evaluate compliance to scheduled CareLink transmissions with the remote management system
This is a non-randomized, multi-center, prospective study in which 120 patients who have a pacemaker are enrolled into the study and receive a CareLink monitor. Patients will replace their regularly scheduled pacemaker clinic follow-up visits with a CareLink remote transmission for 12months.
Patients will require a test transmission within 1 month after they receive their CareLink monitor. Afterwards, patients are followed via CareLink transmissions as per their usual clinic schedule for 12 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Trial of Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Versus Quarterly Device Interrogations in Clinic
NCT00606567
Economic Evaluation and Communication in Remote Monitoring of People With Pacemakers
NCT02237404
PREFER (Pacemaker Remote Follow-Up Evaluation and Review)
NCT00294645
Clinical Assessment of Essential Remote Monitoring Functions in Pacemakers
NCT05165095
MOnitoring REsynchronization deviCes and cARdiac patiEnts
NCT00885677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Pacemaker Patients
CareLink Remote Monitoring
Substitution of CareLink Remote Monitoring of Pacemakers for in-clinic pacemaker follow-up visits
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CareLink Remote Monitoring
Substitution of CareLink Remote Monitoring of Pacemakers for in-clinic pacemaker follow-up visits
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who have been implanted with their current pacemaker for at least 3 months.
* Patients who are willing, or who have caregivers willing, to use the Medtronic CareLink Monitor.
* Patients who are willing and able to sign an IRB/MEC approved patient informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have already previously used a Medtronic CareLink Monitor.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kelowna General Hospital
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Southlake Regional Hospital
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
CHUQ, L'Hotel Dieu de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REMOTE-IPG 2008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.