Preoperative Glucose Infusion: a Novel Strategy to Improve Liver Function After Liver Resection
NCT ID: NCT00623662
Last Updated: 2018-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-02-29
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We further investigate whether the benefit of avoiding preoperative fasting is more pronounced in patients undergoing more extensive liver resection.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intraoperative Glucose Control in Liver Transplant
NCT00780026
The Association Between Peri-Operative Hyperglycemia and Major Morbidity and Mortality
NCT00487162
Outcomes Study of Hyperinsulinemic Glucose Control in Cardiac Surgery
NCT00524472
Perioperative Glucose and Insulin Changes in Major Urologic Surgeries
NCT05222659
Outcomes With Tight Control of Hyperglycemia in Cardiac Surgery Patients
NCT00282698
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The results of a pilot study demonstrate that metabolic preconditioning, i.e. the avoidance of preoperative fasting by intravenous administration of dextrose preserves hepatic glycogen and prevents hepatic dysfunction after liver resection. Liver function in this protocol was assessed by a score originally proposed by Schindl including serum concentrations of total bilirubin and lactate, prothrombin time and degree of encephalopathy. Due to alterations induced by anesthesia and surgery, e.g. blood loss necessitating transfusion, hypothermia, inflammatory responses and use of drugs with impact on hepatobiliary metabolism, liver function scores do not necessarily reflect functional integrity and metabolic capacity of the liver. In contrast, measuring the production of proteins that are exclusively synthetized by hepatocytes such as albumin allows a more specific and quantitative assessment of hepatic performance under perioperative conditions.
Hypothesis. We propose a randomized double-blinded study to test the hypothesis that, in patients scheduled for resection of liver cancer, metabolic preconditioning with intravenous dextrose preserves hepatic glycogen resulting in improved hepatic metabolic function postoperatively. We further hypothesize that the benefit of avoiding preoperative fasting is more pronounced in patients undergoing more extensive liver resection. Hepatic synthetic capacity will be assessed by measuring albumin synthesis using a stable isotope tracer technique.
Research plan. In order to test the validity of our assumptions, we will perform studies in patients scheduled for minor (study I; one or two liver segments, n=30) or major (study II; three or more liver segments, n=20) liver resection. In a double blinded fashion patients will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous dextrose at 2 mg/kg/min or saline from 15:00 on the day before the operation until surgical skin incision. Metabolic processes at the organ level (liver, muscle), i.e. fractional synthesis rates of albumin, hepatic acute phase proteins (transthyretin (=prealbumin), fibrinogen, total plasma proteins) and muscle protein will be determined one day before and one day after the operation using primed-continuous infusions of L-\[2H5\]phenylalanine. Stable isotopes (L-\[1-13C\]leucine, \[6,6-2H2\]glucose) will be applied to assess dynamic changes in whole body protein and glucose metabolism before and after surgery, i.e. protein breakdown, amino acid oxidation, protein synthesis, glucose production and glucose uptake.
Significance. The demonstration that the preconditioning with dextrose preserves metabolic performance of the liver would have important implications for the clinical management of surgical patients with liver cancer. If preoperative dextrose administration attenuates hepatic dysfunction after liver resection, it will provide these patients with a readily available, safe and inexpensive therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Glucose infusion.
Preoperative glucose infusion
Glucose infusion from 15:00 on the day before the operation until beginning of surgery.
2
Normal saline infusion.
Preoperative normal saline infusion
Normal saline infusion from 15:00 on the day before surgery until beginning of the operation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Preoperative glucose infusion
Glucose infusion from 15:00 on the day before the operation until beginning of surgery.
Preoperative normal saline infusion
Normal saline infusion from 15:00 on the day before surgery until beginning of the operation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* liver resection (one or more liver segments) for primary or secondary malignancy
* ability to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* chronic viral liver disease
* diabetes mellitus
* significant cardiorespiratory, renal and neurological disease
* musculoskeletal or neuromuscular disease
* severe anemia (hemoglobin \<10 g.dL-1)
* history of severe sciatica or back surgery or other conditions which contraindicate the use of an epidural catheter
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ralph Lattermann
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ralph Lattermann, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Anaesthesia, McGill University Health Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIHR 183635
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GEN-07-075
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.