Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE1
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-02
2028-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
People with type 1 diabetes also have unusually low stores of sugar in their livers. It has been shown in animal studies that when the amount of sugar stored in the liver is increased, it increases the release of glucagon and epinephrine during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. In turn, this increase in hormone release boosts liver sugar production. However, it is not known if increased liver sugar content can influence these responses in people with and without type 1 diabetes. In addition, when people with type 1 diabetes do experience an episode of low blood sugar, it impairs their responses to low blood sugar the next day. It is also unknown whether this reduction in low blood sugar responses is caused by low liver sugar levels.
The investigators want to learn more about how liver sugar levels affect the ability to respond to low blood sugar.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Fasting on Insulin-induced Hypoglycemia Counterregulation in Healthy Humans
NCT04392843
Effect of C-peptide on Hypoglycemic Counterregulation
NCT06470295
Identifying the Brain Substrates of Hypoglycemia Unawareness in Type 1 Diabetes
NCT02866435
The Efficacy of Glucagon Like Peptide (GLP) - 1(7-36) Amide for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients
NCT00798590
Hypoglycemia: Physician and Patient Perspectives
NCT01176656
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As the glycemic level falls in people who are generally healthy (i.e., non-T1D), the first response is an abatement of insulin secretion. This reduction is then followed by an increase in the release of the counterregulatory hormones glucagon and epinephrine as glycemia continues to fall. Collectively, this hormonal milieu causes an increase in liver glycogen mobilization and gluconeogenesis such that hepatic glucose production (HGP) increases, thereby preventing serious hypoglycemia from occurring. However, people with T1D are unable to reduce their own insulin levels (due to subcutaneous insulin delivery) and often have a diminished capacity to secrete both glucagon and epinephrine during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Predictably, the HGP response to hypoglycemia in people with T1D is a fraction of that seen in non-T1D controls, thereby increasing the depth and duration of the hypoglycemic episode.
Liver glycogen is the first substrate used to defend against hypoglycemia. Interestingly, hepatic glycogen levels in people with T1D are lower than those of non-T1D controls and their ability to mobilize liver glycogen to combat insulin-induced hypoglycemia is also diminished. Because of this, we carried out experiments in dogs to determine whether hepatic glycogen content is a determinant of the HGP response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Results of those studies showed that a 75% increase in liver glycogen (such as occurs in a non-T1D individual over the course of a day) generated a signal in the liver that was transmitted to the brain via afferent nerves which, in turn, led to an increase in the secretion of both epinephrine and glucagon. As expected, this increase in counterregulatory hormone secretion caused a 2.4-fold rise in HGP, despite insulin levels that were \~ 400 µU/mL at the liver.
The finding that an acute increase in hepatic glycogen can augment hypoglycemic counterregulation has important clinical implications. However, despite the potential of this therapeutic avenue to reduce the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycemia, it remains unclear at this point if such a strategy translates to humans with T1D. Therefore, the overarching theme of this proposal is to determine whether an acute increase in liver glycogen content can augment the hepatic and hormonal responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in humans with and without T1D. Herein we are proposing studies that will advance the field, with the specific aims being as follows:
Specific Aim #1: To determine the effect of increasing liver glycogen deposition on insulin-induced hypoglycemic counterregulation in humans with and without T1D.
The discovery of ways by which the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycemia can be reduced in people with T1D is a priority. The proposed experiments will improve our understanding of the mechanisms by which increased glycogen improves hypoglycemic counterregulation. If hypoglycemia is reduced by increased glycogen, it will focus attention on the ways in which liver glycogen levels can be normalized in people with T1D. This would be a significant step forward in the ongoing effort to reduce the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycemia in people with T1D.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Controls-saline
Each subject from Group 1 will undergo a metabolic study where saline is infused so as to not stimulate liver glucose uptake and glycogen deposition.
Saline
Saline given as a comparison to fructose.
Somatostatin
IV infusion of somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min)
Insulin
IV infusion of insulin between 20-60 mU/m2/min.
Glucagon
IV glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min).
Dextrose solution
IV dextrose to clamp the plasma glucose at the desired level.
Controls-high fructose
A second group of control subjects will undergo a single metabolic study using a higher dose of fructose (6.5 mg/kg/min).
Low Fructose
IV fructose (1.3 mg/kg/min)
Somatostatin
IV infusion of somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min)
Insulin
IV infusion of insulin between 20-60 mU/m2/min.
Glucagon
IV glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min).
Dextrose solution
IV dextrose to clamp the plasma glucose at the desired level.
Controls-low fructose
Each subject from Group 1 will undergo another metabolic study where fructose (1.3 mg/kg/min) is infused so as to stimulate liver glucose uptake and glycogen deposition.
Somatostatin
IV infusion of somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min)
Insulin
IV infusion of insulin between 20-60 mU/m2/min.
Glucagon
IV glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min).
Dextrose solution
IV dextrose to clamp the plasma glucose at the desired level.
High Fructose
IV-fructose (6.5 mg/kg/min)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low Fructose
IV fructose (1.3 mg/kg/min)
Saline
Saline given as a comparison to fructose.
Somatostatin
IV infusion of somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min)
Insulin
IV infusion of insulin between 20-60 mU/m2/min.
Glucagon
IV glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min).
Dextrose solution
IV dextrose to clamp the plasma glucose at the desired level.
High Fructose
IV-fructose (6.5 mg/kg/min)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 21-40 years.
* Non-obese (BMI \<28 kg/m2).
Exclusion Criteria
* Cigarette smoking.
* Taking inflammation-targeting steroids (e.g., prednisone).
* Taking medications targeting adrenergic signaling (e.g., beta-blockers, bronchodilators).
* Abnormal hematocrit or electrolyte levels.
* The presence of cardiovascular or peripheral vascular disease.
* The presence of neuropathy, retinopathy or nephropathy.
* Any metal in the body that would make magnetic resonance spectroscopy dangerous.
21 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jason Winnick
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jason Winnick
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jason Winnick, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cincinnati
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-7982
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.