Safety and Efficacy of Peginesatide for the Treatment of Anemia in Participants With Chronic Renal Failure Not on Dialysis

NCT ID: NCT00598442

Last Updated: 2013-02-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

493 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of peginesatide for the treatment of anemia in participants with chronic kidney disease, who are not on dialysis and not on erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anemia associated with chronic kidney disease is due to several factors, primarily the inability of the diseased kidneys to produce adequate amounts of endogenous erythropoietin. Ancillary factors include the shortened lifespan of red blood cells, iron and other nutritional deficiencies, infection, and inflammation. The presence and severity of anemia are related to the duration and extent of kidney failure. Anemia is associated with increased mortality, increased likelihood of hospitalization, reduced cognitive function, and increased left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure.

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have been established as a treatment for anemia in chronic renal failure subjects, and have improved the management of anemia over alternatives such as transfusion. Peginesatide is a parenteral formulation developed for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Peginesatide binds to and activates the human erythropoietin receptor and stimulates erythropoiesis in human red cell precursors in a manner similar to other known erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Study participants received doses of peginesatide administered once every 4 weeks or darbepoetin alfa administered once every 2 weeks. Total commitment time for this study was a 4 week screening period followed by a minimum of 52 weeks of study treatment. Eligible participants were randomized in equal proportions to two peginesatide treatment regimens and one control, darbepoetin alfa, treatment regimen.

To evaluate the cardiovascular safety of peginesatide, a cardiovascular composite safety endpoint (CSE) was defined for use in prospectively planned analyses which combined cardiovascular safety data from the four Phase 3 peginesatide studies (NCT00598273, NCT00597753, NCT00598442, and NCT00597584). The CSE consisted of six events: death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and serious adverse events of congestive heart failure, unstable angina, and arrhythmia. An independent Event Review Committee (ERC) was used to provide blinded adjudication of potential CSE events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Renal Failure Chronic Kidney Disease Anemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peginesatide 0.025 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

peginesatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received peginesatide by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 0.025 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) and was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 11.0-12.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL).

Peginesatide 0.04 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

peginesatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received peginesatide by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 0.04 mg/kg and was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 11.0-12.0 g/dL.

Darbepoetin alfa

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Darbepoetin alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received darbepoetin alfa by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks, as prescribed. The starting dose was 0.75 microgram per kilogram (mcg/kg) and was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 11.0-12.0 g/dL.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

peginesatide

Participants received peginesatide by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 0.025 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) and was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 11.0-12.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL).

Intervention Type DRUG

peginesatide

Participants received peginesatide by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks. The starting dose was 0.04 mg/kg and was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 11.0-12.0 g/dL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Darbepoetin alfa

Participants received darbepoetin alfa by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks, as prescribed. The starting dose was 0.75 microgram per kilogram (mcg/kg) and was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 11.0-12.0 g/dL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Omontys Hematide AF37702 Injection Omontys Hematide AF37702 Injection Aranesp

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Chronic renal failure with an estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 60 milliliters per minute per 1.73 m\^2 and not expected to begin dialysis for at least 12 weeks.
2. Two consecutive hemoglobin values ≥ 8.0 g/dL and \< 11.0 g/dL within 4 weeks prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
2. Treatment with an ESA in the 12 weeks prior to randomization.
3. Known intolerance to any ESA, parenteral iron supplementation, or pegylated molecule.
4. Prior chronic hemodialysis or chronic peritoneal dialysis treatment.
5. Known bleeding or coagulation disorder.
6. Known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease.
7. Poorly controlled hypertension.
8. Evidence of active malignancy within one year prior to randomization
9. A scheduled kidney transplant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Affymax

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vice President, Clinical Development

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Affymax

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Granada Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Pinecrest, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Canton, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Caldwell, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Mishawaka, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Ames, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Petoskey, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Flushing, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Neenah, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Facility

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Facility

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Facility

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Facility

Veliko Tarnovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Facility

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Facility

Tábor, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Facility

Zdar, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Facility

Demmin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Facility

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Facility

Kistarcsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Facility

Szigetvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Facility

Lecco, , Italy

Site Status

Research Facility

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Research Facility

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Facility

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Facility

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Research Facility

Zamość, , Poland

Site Status

Research Facility

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Research Facility

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Research Facility

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Research Facility

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Research Facility

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Bulgaria Czechia Germany Hungary Italy Poland Puerto Rico Romania United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Macdougall IC, Provenzano R, Sharma A, Spinowitz BS, Schmidt RJ, Pergola PE, Zabaneh RI, Tong-Starksen S, Mayo MR, Tang H, Polu KR, Duliege AM, Fishbane S; PEARL Study Groups. Peginesatide for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not receiving dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 24;368(4):320-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203166.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23343062 (View on PubMed)

Fishbane S, Schiller B, Locatelli F, Covic AC, Provenzano R, Wiecek A, Levin NW, Kaplan M, Macdougall IC, Francisco C, Mayo MR, Polu KR, Duliege AM, Besarab A; EMERALD Study Groups. Peginesatide in patients with anemia undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 24;368(4):307-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203165.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23343061 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007-004146-32

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AFX01-13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.