Efficacy and Safety of Peginesatide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Participants Previously Treated With Epoetin.

NCT ID: NCT00752791

Last Updated: 2012-08-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of peginesatide injection for maintenance treatment of anemia in participants on peritoneal dialysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the International Federation of Renal Registries, in 1999 the prevalence of peritoneal dialysis in the United States as approximately 9.5% of patients receiving dialysis (2005 United States Renal Data Systems data indicates a prevalence of around 7.5%). Data from Europe in 1999 to 2000 (not including the United Kingdom, France or Germany) indicated peritoneal dialysis was the mode of dialysis in approximately 11.1% of dialysis patients. 2006 data from the United Kingdom indicates that more than 20% of patients on dialysis are receiving peritoneal dialysis while French and German data indicate rates of 8.1% and 4.8% respectively. More than 90% of patients with chronic renal failure/chronic kidney disease Stage 5 (End Stage Renal Disease) are anemic. The vast majority of patients receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy to treat their anemia.

Anemia of chronic renal failure is due to several factors, primarily the inability of the diseased kidneys to produce adequate amounts of endogenous erythropoietin. Ancillary factors also include the shortened lifespan of red blood cells, iron and other nutritional deficiencies, infection, and inflammation. The prevalence of anemia increases with progressive deterioration of renal function, and affects more than 90% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 5 (End Stage Renal Disease). Anemia is associated with increased mortality, increased likelihood of hospitalization, reduced cognitive function and exercise capacity, increased left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Treatment of anemia reduces morbidity and mortality risks and may improve quality of life.

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have been established as a treatment for anemia in chronic renal failure participants, and have improved the management of anemia over alternatives such as transfusion. Peginesatide (hematide) is a parenteral formulation being developed for the correction of anemia in patients with chronic renal failure, and binds to and activates the human erythropoietin receptor and stimulates erythropoiesis in human red cell precursors in a manner similar to other known erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Participants in this study received variable doses of peginesatide injection once every four weeks. Total commitment time for this study was about 29 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Anemia Drug Therapy Peritoneal Dialysis.

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peginesatide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peginesatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Peginesatide 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection, once every 4 weeks for up to 25 weeks. Initial dose based on patient's previous total weekly Epoetin dose, and thereafter could be adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peginesatide

Peginesatide 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection, once every 4 weeks for up to 25 weeks. Initial dose based on patient's previous total weekly Epoetin dose, and thereafter could be adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Hematide AF37702 Omontys

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patient was a man or woman and 18 to 90 years of age, inclusive.
2. The patient had CKD and had been on peritoneal dialysis for ≥3 months before enrollment.
3. The patient was on stable SC epoetin (alfa or beta) maintenance therapy continuously prescribed for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
4. The patient had 4 consecutive Hb values with a mean ≥10.0 and ≤12.0 g/dL during the screening period, with the difference between the mean of the first confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values and the mean of the last confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values being ≤1.0 g/dL.
5. The patient had 1 ferritin level ≥100 ng/mL within 4 weeks before enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The patient had known bleeding or coagulation disorder.
2. The patient had known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease (e.g., pure red cell aplasia, homozygous sickle-cell disease, thalassemia, multiple myeloma, hemolytic anemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome).
3. The patient had received a recent course of intensive iron replacement (i.e., more than 500 mg IV in the 28 days before enrollment).
4. The patient had advanced chronic congestive heart failure defined by New York Heart Association Class III or IV.
5. The patient had a known history of seizure disorder or received antiepileptic medication for a seizure disorder within 6 months before enrollment.
6. The patient had a scheduled kidney transplant. (Note: patients who were currently on a transplant waiting list were not excluded unless there was an identified donor).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Affymax

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azusa, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Iberia, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Mechanicsville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

New Lambtom, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Modena, Modena, Italy

Site Status

Dunedin, Dunedin, New Zealand

Site Status

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Italy New Zealand United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-003458-13

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1114-0301

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AFX01_201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id