Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in Participants With ESRD on Stable Dialysis

NCT ID: NCT02273726

Last Updated: 2021-10-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

741 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-15

Study Completion Date

2018-09-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat compared with active control (epoetin alfa) for the maintenance treatment of anemia in participants with ESRD on dialysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will consist of three study periods as follows:

1. Screening Period of up to 6 weeks (8 weeks if on Mircera)
2. Treatment Period: a minimum of 52 weeks, a maximum of up to 3 years from the date last participant is randomized. Minimum study duration for participants enrolled under Protocol Amendment 1 or 2 may be less than 52 weeks
3. A Follow-up period of 4 weeks.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either roxadustat or epoetin alfa (active control) in an open-label manner.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CKD Anemia in Stable Dialysis Patients

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Anemia Chronic Kidney Disease Dialysis hemodialysis peritoneal dialysis hemoglobin End stage renal disease Stable Dialysis erythropoietins erythropoiesis stimulating agent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Roxadustat

Participants will receive roxadustat tablets, administered orally 3 times weekly (TIW). Initial roxadustat dose will be based on the participant's average prescribed erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) dose in the 4 weeks (if on epoetin or darbepoetin or 8 weeks (if on Mircera®) prior to randomization. Dose adjustments will be permitted to maintain a hemoglobin (Hb) level of approximately 11 grams (g)/deciliter (dL). The maximum roxadustat dose is 3.0 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) per dose or 400 mg per administration (whichever is lower).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Roxadustat

Intervention Type DRUG

Roxadustat will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Epoetin Alfa

Participants on hemodialysis (HD) will receive epoetin alfa, administered intravenously (IV) TIW and participants on home HD or peritoneal dialysis (PD) will receive epoetin alfa, administered subcutaneously (SC). Initial epoetin alfa dose will be based on the participant's average weekly prescribed ESA dose in 4 weeks prior to randomization if on epoetin or darbepoetin, and average monthly (4-week) prescribed ESA dose in 8 weeks prior to randomization if on Mircera®. In case of a change in route of administration from SC to IV (TIW), the initial dose of IV epoetin alfa will be determined by the investigator per local standard of care (SOC). Dose adjustments will follow the recommendations as per the approved country-specific product label (United States Package Insert \[USPI\] or Summary of Product Characteristics \[SmPC\]) or local SOC.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epoetin Alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

Epoetin alfa will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epoetin Alfa

Epoetin alfa will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Roxadustat

Roxadustat will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FG-4592

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Receiving dialysis for ESRD for ≥3 months. Incident dialysis participants (under Amendment 1 and 2) receiving dialysis for ESRD for ≥ 2 weeks but ≤ 4 months at the time of randomization
* Participants must be on ESA for ≥ 8 weeks prior to screening; incident dialysis participants must be on ESA for ≥ 4 weeks prior to screening.
* Mean of the 3 most recent central lab Hb values during the Screening Period must be ≥ 9.0 g/dL and ≤ 12.0 g/dL (for incident dialysis participants, mean of the 2 most recent Hb values must be ≥ 8.5 g/dL and ≤ 12.0 g/dL); with an absolute difference of ≤ 1.3 g/dL between the highest and the lowest value. Samples are obtained at least 4 days apart (2 days under Amendment 2) and the last Hb value must be within 10 days prior to the randomization visit
* Participants with ferritin level ≥ 100 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (\<100 ng/mL under Amendment 2) or transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≥ 20% (\<20% under Amendment 2) at screening may qualify upon receiving iron supplement (per local standard of care)
* Participants with a serum folate and Vitamin B12 ≥ lower limit of normal (LLN) (\< LLN under Amendment 2) at screening may qualify upon receiving supplement (per local standard of care)
* Participant's alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are ≤3x the upper limit of normal (ULN), and total bilirubin (TBL) is ≤1.5x ULN at screening
* Participant's body weight is 45 kilograms (kg) to 160 kg.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participant has received an red blood cell (RBC) transfusion within 8 weeks (4 weeks under Amendment 2) prior to randomization
* Participant has known history of myelodysplastic syndrome or multiple myeloma
* Participant has known inherited disease such as thalassemia or sickle cell anemia or other known causes for anemia other than chronic kidney disease.
* Participant has known hemosiderosis, hemochromatosis, coagulation disorder,or hypercoagulable condition
* Participant has known chronic inflammatory disease that could cause anemia
* Participant has anticipated surgery that is expected to cause blood loss
* Participant has known gastrointestinal bleeding
* Participant has history of chronic liver disease (for example, chronic infectious hepatitis,chronic auto-immune liver disease,cirrhosis, or fibrosis of the liver)
* Participant with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure
* Participant has had a heart attack, stroke, seizure, or a thrombotic/thromboembolic event (for example, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) within 12 weeks prior to participating in the study
* Participant has uncontrolled high blood pressure within 2 weeks prior to participating in the study
* Participant has a history of malignancy, except for the following: cancers determined to be cured or in remission for ≥2 years, curatively resected basal cell or squamous cell skin cancers, cervical cancer in situ, or resected colonic polyps.)
* Participant is positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B surface antigen, or anti-hepatitis C virus antibody
* Participant with prior organ transplant who experience rejection within 6 months or on high doses of immunosuppressive therapy
* Participant has any of the following known untreated conditions; proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, macular degeneration or retinal vein occlusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

FibroGen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Meraf Eyassu

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

FibroGen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Pine Bluff, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Ontario, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

San Dimas, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

San Gabriel, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Coral Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Albany, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Pontiac, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Brookhaven, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Columbus, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Gulfport, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Saint Ann, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Research Center

North Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Gallup, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Center

College Point, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Aiken, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Sumter, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Edinburg, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Grand Prairie, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Mansfield, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Shorewood, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Center

Caguas, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Research Center

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hamano T, Yamaguchi Y, Goto K, Martin S, Jiletcovici A, Dellanna F, Akizawa T, Barratt J. Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Four Global Roxadustat Phase 3 Trials. Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1553-1575. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02728-2. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38363466 (View on PubMed)

Barratt J, Dellanna F, Portoles J, Choukroun G, De Nicola L, Young J, Dimkovic N, Reusch M. Safety of Roxadustat Versus Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients with Anemia of Non-dialysis-Dependent or Incident-to-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies. Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1546-1559. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02433-0. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36749544 (View on PubMed)

Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36005278 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FGCL-4592-064

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id