Determine Safety and Efficacy of Long-term Oral Lacosamide in Patients With Partial Seizures

NCT ID: NCT00522275

Last Updated: 2018-07-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether lacosamide is safe and effective for long-term use in patients with partial-seizures from epilepsy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Partial Epilepsies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lacosamide

Up to 800 mg/day lacosamide (flexible dosing)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lacosamide

Intervention Type DRUG

50mg or 100 mg tablets, up to 800 mg/day given twice daily (BID) throughout the trial

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lacosamide

50mg or 100 mg tablets, up to 800 mg/day given twice daily (BID) throughout the trial

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Completion of parent clinical trial for treatment of partial seizures

Exclusion Criteria

* Receiving any study drug or experimental device other than lacosamide
* Meets withdrawal criteria for parent trial or experiencing ongoing serious adverse event
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Fairfield, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Maitland, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Golden Valley, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Somerset, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Beaufort, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Husain A, Chung S, Faught E, Isojarvi J, McShea C, Doty P. Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a Phase III open-label extension trial. Epilepsia. 2012 Mar;53(3):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22372628 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-004398-18

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SP0756

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.