Virtual Clinic Pacemaker Follow-up

NCT ID: NCT00475124

Last Updated: 2014-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

123 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with implanted pacemakers are currently seen by their cardiologists every 6-12 months. Shorter follow-up intervals are generally seen as excessive workload for the physician, with little benefit for the patient. Longer intervals are seen as too dangerous concerning device integrity and safety. This scheme still results in a large number of follow-up visits with little or no important changes in pacemaker therapy.

Our clinical trial investigates efficacy and safety of the Home Monitoring technology for increasing the flexibility in pacemaker follow-up. Home Monitoring technology allows automatic transmission via mobile phone links of relevant data from the implanted pacemaker to a service center. The patient's physician can access the data via a password-protected internet site. The regular Home Monitoring data analyses entirely replace clinical routine visits ("virtual clinic"). Follow-up visits are scheduled according to the results of the Home Monitoring data analyses.

The primary endpoint of the study is to compare the total workload for pacemaker patient care in the virtual clinic with that of standard follow-up scheme with regularly scheduled clinical visits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with implanted pacemakers are currently seen by their cardiologists every 6-12 months. Shorter follow-up intervals are generally seen as excessive workload for the physician, with little benefit for the patient. Longer intervals are seen as too dangerous concerning device integrity and safety. This scheme still results in a large number of follow-up visits with little or no important changes in pacemaker therapy. On the other hand, in some patients there are quicker changes in their cardiac situation and the need for subsequent adaptation of pacemaker programming, which cannot be detected and properly treated with standard follow-up scheme.

Our clinical trial investigates efficacy and safety of the Home Monitoring technology for increasing the flexibility in pacemaker follow-up. Home Monitoring technology allows automatic transmission via mobile phone links of relevant data from the implanted pacemaker to a service center. The patient's physician can access the data via a password-protected internet site. The regular Home Monitoring data analyses entirely replace clinical routine visits ("virtual clinic"). Follow-up visits are scheduled according to the results of the Home Monitoring data analyses.

For the primary endpoint, the total workload for pacemaker patient care in the virtual clinic is compared to that of a standard follow-up scheme with regular clinic visits. The total workload comprises the time for data analyses, clinical examinations, and other patient contacts.

Secondary endpoints investigate adverse events rate, quality of life, and total costs, as mirrored by direct patient's expenses, and patient travel and waiting time, for visits to the pacer clinic as well as to additional cardiologist's or internal medicine doctor's services.

Standard vs. virtual follow-up. For the standard follow-up group patients, routine follow-up visits are scheduled 1 month and 12 months after pre-discharge control, and then every 12 months. A follow-up at 6 months after discharge is optional. For the virtual clinic group patients, a routine follow-up visit is scheduled 1 month after pre-discharge control. The Home Monitoring data analyses have to be performed 12 months after discharge, and then every 12 months. If a 6-month follow-up is routinely done for the standard group in the clinic, a 6-month Home Monitoring data analysis has to be done as well. Event reports have to be analysed within 24 hours during working days.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sick Sinus Syndrome Heart Block Bradycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Home Monitoring ON

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Home Monitoring of pacemaker

Intervention Type DEVICE

Daily Home Monitoring data transmission from the implanted pacemaker to Home Monitoring service center.

2

Home Monitoring OFF

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Home Monitoring of pacemaker deactivated

Intervention Type DEVICE

No Home Monitoring data transmission.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Home Monitoring of pacemaker

Daily Home Monitoring data transmission from the implanted pacemaker to Home Monitoring service center.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Home Monitoring of pacemaker deactivated

No Home Monitoring data transmission.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Indication for implantation of dual-chamber rate-adaptive pacemaker
* Stable medical situation
* Patient informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Contra-indication for implantation of dual-chamber rate-adaptive pacemaker
* Persistent atrial fibrillation
* Replacement indication
* Participation in another clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biotronik SE & Co. KG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Fluck, Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

St. Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, UK

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barnet & Chase Farm Hospital

Barnet, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Basildon Hospital

Basildon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St. Peter's Hospital

Chertsey, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Russels Hall Hospital

Dudley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Middlesex University Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcross Hospital

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HS036

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physiologic Pacing Registry
NCT03719040 COMPLETED
MIRACLE EF Clinical Study
NCT01735916 TERMINATED NA