Coronary Computed Tomography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment (CT-STAT)

NCT ID: NCT00468325

Last Updated: 2009-11-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

750 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized multicenter trial comparing MSCT to standard of care (SOC) diagnostic treatment in the triage of Emergency Department (ED) low to intermediate risk chest pain patients. Our hypotheses are that compared to SOC treatment, MSCT is equally safe and diagnostically effective, as well as more time and cost efficient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Computed tomography (CT) or "cat scan" is an x-ray test routinely used for diagnostic purposes. Heart ("Cardiac") CT, using the newest scanners, is an improved way of looking at the coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart muscle. If these arteries are clogged this may cause chest pain or even a heart attack. The images of the coronary arteries obtained by CT scanners (during a 5-10 minute procedure) have been shown by many studies to be accurate, when compared to the conventional invasive cardiac catheterization procedure. In addition, at least five prior studies done at different hospitals suggest that cardiac CT scans are effective for diagnosing chest pain like yours in patients coming to the emergency room. What is new about this study is that it is being done in multiple hospitals at the same time. This is part of the process that all medical advances must go through to become a part of routine care of patients in hospitals throughout the country.

A standard chest pain workup typically done in the emergency department consists of a physical examination, electrocardiograms (EKGs), and several blood tests. Blood tests typically completed include cardiac enzymes (Troponin, CK \& CK-MB), a kidney function test, a pregnancy test if applicable, and possibly a lipid panel, depending on physician preference. For each test, a 3mL vial will be filled with a specimen of blood and processed in the laboratory for result. Also a two-part "rest-stress" nuclear scan is typically performed, which compares blood flow into the heart tissue at rest to blood flow into the heart tissue during exercise or dilation with medications. Based on prior studies, the researchers doing the present study believe that CT scanning of the coronary arteries can provide information that is just as safe and accurate as the rest-stress nuclear scan, and can do so more rapidly at a lower cost.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Angiography Chest Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multi-slice Computed Tomography

Patients admitted to the ED with chest pain and/or anginal equivalent symptoms are randomized to a multi-slice computed tomography arm where they will receive a CT scan of their heart.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multi-slice computed tomography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient receives a CT scan (multi-slice computed tomography) of the heart.

Multi-slice Computed Tomography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients admitted to the emergency department with low to intermediate chest pain receive a multi-slice computed tomographic test of the heart.

Standard of Care

Patients admitted to the ED with chest pain and/or anginal equivalent symptoms are randomized to the Standard of Care arm and receive rest-stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging test.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rest-stress Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient receives the standard of care for emergency room admitting diagnosis of low to intermediate chest pain. A rest-stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging test is performed per the standard of care at each institution.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multi-slice computed tomography

Patient receives a CT scan (multi-slice computed tomography) of the heart.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Rest-stress Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Patient receives the standard of care for emergency room admitting diagnosis of low to intermediate chest pain. A rest-stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging test is performed per the standard of care at each institution.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Multi-slice Computed Tomography

Patients admitted to the emergency department with low to intermediate chest pain receive a multi-slice computed tomographic test of the heart.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MSCT CCTA MPI Nuclear Stress Test CCTA MSCT Ct Scan of the heart

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Chest pain or anginal equivalent symptoms suggestive of acute coronary ischemia within the past 12 hours.
* TIMI risk score less than or equal to 4.
* Ability to provide informed consent.
* Age greater than or equal to 25 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Attending physician makes clinical decision for immediate invasive evaluation.
* Electrographic evidence of ischemia, including acute Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) or ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), with ST segment elevation or depression equal to or greater than 1mm in two or more contiguous leads, and/or T wave inversion greater than or equal to 2 mm.
* Positive cardiac biomarkers (troponin, CK, and/or CK-MB) compatible with AMI on initial laboratory testing, based on site standard laboratory values.
* Presence of pre-existing CAD, including prior MI, prior angiographic evidence of significant CAD, defined as greater than or equal to 25% stenosis, or history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
* Renal insufficiency (creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL) or renal failure requiring dialysis.
* Atrial fibrillation or other markedly irregular rhythm.
* Psychological unsuitability or extreme claustrophobia.
* Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.
* Clinical instability including cardiogenic shock, hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg), refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>180 mmHg on therapy), sustained ventricular or atrial arrhythmia requiring intravenous medications.
* Known allergy to iodine or iodinated contrast.
* Inability to tolerate beta-blocker medication, including patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring maintenance, i.e. use of inhaled bronchodilators or steroids, or patients with complete heart block or second-degree atrioventricular block.
* Iodinated contrast administration or x-ray scan within the past 48 hours.
* Use of any erectile dysfunction medications such as Viagra or Cialis in the last 24 hours.
* Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than or equal to 39 kg/m2. . Use of biguanides within the past 48 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

William Beaumont Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

William Beaumont Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilbert Raff, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

William Beaumont Hospitals

Kavitha Chinnaiyan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

William Beaumont Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Florida

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Faqua Heart Center/Piedmont Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont-Troy

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis Heart Institute

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St. Paul Heart Clinic

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mt Sinai Hospitl

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Metrohealth Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Texas Heart Institute

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

MultiCare Health System-Good Samaritan Hospital

Puyallup, Washington, United States

Site Status

Wisconsin Heart & Vascular Center

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O'Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL; CT-STAT Investigators. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.068.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21939822 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007-016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of CXR and MnDCT
NCT00188435 COMPLETED PHASE1
CT Data Collection Study
NCT03589664 COMPLETED