BNP Therapy Observation Unit Outcomes STudy (BOOST)

NCT ID: NCT00453453

Last Updated: 2015-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators hypothesize that patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) observation unit will have a decreased rate of hospital admissions and ED recidivism when treated with nesiritide versus standard therapy. The investigators also hypothesize that decreasing B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) levels during treatment in an ED observation unit will predict improved patient outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a growing problem in the United States. The increasing number of decompensated heart failure patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) for treatment is worsening the burden on already strained and limited health care resources. In addition, many of these patients will return to the ED for treatment within three months of being treated for decompensated heart failure. The emergence of ED observation units has provided a viable and cost effective alternative to inpatient treatment for many diseases including CHF. It has been shown that intensive, directed therapy in ED observation units has decreased the revisit rates for CHF patients. In addition, the introduction of nesiritide has shown promising results in the treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure.

The primary aim of this study is to compare nesiritide versus standard heart failure therapy in an ED setting. A secondary aim is to determine if serial BNP levels during this observation unit stay will predict clinical outcomes.

The treatment of heart failure in the ED places a tremendous burden on already limited resources. The costs of treatment as well as the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease are worsening and are predicted to increase as the general population ages. The ability to safely treat and discharge patients from an ED observation unit while reducing return visits would be invaluable in managing the growing number of heart failure patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congestive Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nesiritide

Subjects who come into the ED with CHF will be treated with nesiritide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nesiritide

Intervention Type DRUG

Nesiritide given orally in the emergency department

Standard care

Subjects who come into the ED with CHF will receive standard care treatment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nesiritide

Nesiritide given orally in the emergency department

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Natrecor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient \> 18 years of age
* Have a working diagnosis of HF, as determined by the emergency physician using the Boston Criteria. A score of 8-12 is required for inclusion in the study.
* Alert, oriented and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Dialysis Dependent Renal Failure
* Temperature \> 38.5 degrees celsius
* Pneumonia (Infiltrates on Chest X-ray)
* Requiring IV vasoactive agents (Other than Nesiritide)
* Killip Class III/IV
* Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg
* EKG diagnostic or suggestive of Acute myocardial infarction or ischemia
* Abnormal Cardiac Markers
* Lack of a telephone
* Inability to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment or a severe psychiatric disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Scios, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Douglas Ander MD

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Douglas Ander, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Daniel Wu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Grady Memorial Hosptial

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0009-2006

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB00038961

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.