Entecavir Plus Tenofovir Combination Therapy Versus Entecavir Monotherapy in Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B

NCT ID: NCT00410072

Last Updated: 2013-03-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

669 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy with that of entecavir monotherapy. Safety will also be studied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis B, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TDF 0.5 mg

TDF=tenofovir

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Entecavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, ETV = 0.5 mg, once daily, 100 weeks

ETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg

ETV=entecavir; TDF=tenofovir

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Entecavir + Tenofovir

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, ETV = 0.5 mg + TFV = 300 mg, once daily, 100 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Entecavir

Tablets, Oral, ETV = 0.5 mg, once daily, 100 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Entecavir + Tenofovir

Tablets, Oral, ETV = 0.5 mg + TFV = 300 mg, once daily, 100 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Baraclude BMS-200475 Baraclude BMS-200475

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (hepatitis B e antigen \[HbeAg\]-positive or negative) disease
* Nucleoside- and nucleotide-naive
* Males or females ≥16 years of age (or minimum age of consent in a given country)
* Compensated liver function
* HBV DNA \>1.72\*10\*5\*IU/mL (approximately 10\*6\*copies/mL) for HbeAg-positive participants
* HBV DNA \>1.72\*10\*4\*IU/mL (approximately 10\*5\*copies/mL) for Hbe-Ag-negative participants
* Alanine aminotransferase level ≥\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≤10\*ULN

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of decompensated cirrhosis
* Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis D virus
* Laboratory values out of protocol-specified range
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sergio E. Rojter

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Tuan Nguyen, Md

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Jose Gastroenterology

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

Yale University School Of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

University Of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Digestive Healthcare Of Georgia

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Digestive Disease Associates, P.A.

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Maryland Digestive Disease Research, Llc

Laurel, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University Of Michigan Health System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Sing Chan, Md

Flushing, New York, United States

Site Status

North Shore University

Manhasset, New York, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Concorde Medical Group

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School Of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Rosario, Prov de Santa, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Westmead Nsw, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Clayton Vic, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Prahan, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Porto Alegre Rs, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Local Institution

Lucknow, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Ludhiana, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Vellore, , India

Site Status

Local Institution

Antella Firenze, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Durango, Durango, Mexico

Site Status

Local Institution

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

N1 City Goodwood, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Bornova Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Local Institution

Cebeci Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Local Institution

Sihhiye Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Local Institution

Trabzon, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Canada France India Italy Mexico Poland Russia South Africa Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lok AS, Trinh H, Carosi G, Akarca US, Gadano A, Habersetzer F, Sievert W, Wong D, Lovegren M, Cohen D, Llamoso C. Efficacy of entecavir with or without tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):619-628.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.037. Epub 2012 May 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22643350 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AI463-110

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Continue Entecavir Rollover From China
NCT00975091 COMPLETED PHASE3