Efficacy and Safety Study of Entecavir Plus Tenofovir in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Failed Previous Treatment

NCT ID: NCT01063036

Last Updated: 2014-12-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to show that the combination of entecavir and tenofovir, is effective and well tolerated in chronic hepatitis B patients who have failed previous treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Hepatitis B

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Entecavir + Tenofovir

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Entecavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 1 mg, once daily, 96 weeks

Tenofovir

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Oral, 300 mg, once daily, 96 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Entecavir

Tablets, Oral, 1 mg, once daily, 96 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir

Tablets, Oral, 300 mg, once daily, 96 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Baraclude® BMS-200475 Viread®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; either hepatitis B-e antigen(HBeAg)-negative or HBeAg-positive
* Subjects must have a treatment failure to their current nucleoside/ nucleotide treatment regimen
* Prior entecavir and/or tenofovir monotherapy is allowed
* Subjects must have compensated liver function

Exclusion Criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
* Evidence of decompensated cirrhosis
* Co-infection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis D virus (HDV)
* Moderate or severe renal impairment
* Recent history of pancreatitis
* Therapy with interferon, thymosin alpha or other immuno-stimulators within 24 weeks of being assigned to study drug into this study
* Prior entecavir/tenofovir combination therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Heindelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

München, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Bagno A Ripoli (Fi), , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Foggia, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Arnhem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Kielce, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Local Institution

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Local Institution

Burcuresti, , Romania

Site Status

Local Institution

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal France Germany Italy Netherlands Poland Romania Spain

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-015705-40

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AI463-203

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id