Comparison Between Two Methods of Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT)
NCT ID: NCT00400881
Last Updated: 2017-06-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
122 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-01-31
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Automatic Tube Compensation vs. Pressure Support Ventilation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Adults
NCT07005505
T-piece Versus Pressure-support for the Spontaneous Breathing Trial
NCT04227639
Trial of Spontaneous Breathing Test
NCT06593288
Non-invasive Respiratory Monitoring During SBT
NCT05295186
Spontaneous Breathing Trial With T-piece or Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation
NCT04222205
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is common practice in these patients to perform trials of "spontaneous" breathing while still connected to the ventilator in order to assess their readiness to breathe without assistance. To help with this assessment, new mechanical modes have been incorporated to modern ventilators. A recently developed mode, called Automatic Tube Compensation, is designed for this purpose ("spontaneous" breathing). Whether this method is superior to traditional ones has not been established and the investigators intend to address this question.
The investigators aim to:
1. compare Automatic Tube Compensation vs. our traditional mode (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) during spontaneous breathing trials in their efficacy to identify patients ready be successfully removed from mechanical ventilation
2. study which physiologic variables better predict successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in these two modes.
The investigators plan to prospectively randomize patients on mechanical ventilation at the point of weaning evaluation, to undergo spontaneous breathing trials with our current ventilatory mode (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) or the new mode (Automatic Tube Compensation). Based on predefined physiologic and clinical variables, clinicians will decide whether patients are ready to be removed from mechanical ventilation. The proportions of successful discontinuation (no need to reinstitute mechanical ventilation) and the duration of the weaning period in both groups will be compared. During the spontaneous breathing trials, respiratory variables will be measured and compared between patients with successful vs. non successful discontinuation in order to evaluate their predictive value for successful outcome.
Mechanical ventilation is being used increasingly given our growing population with advanced age and multiple co morbidities and the rising volume of aggressive medical procedures. It is well known to be associated with medical complications and high health care costs. Reducing the duration of unnecessary mechanical ventilation while minimizing the risk of premature removal of needed assistance is the final objective of this project. Approaching this goal will decrease the adverse effects of this treatment and the cost of critical care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous PAP (CPAP)
CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure). 5 cm H2O.
No interventions assigned to this group
Automatic tube compensation (ATC)
ATC is a new mode of ventilation being compared with traditional one (CPAP). ATC is a mode of ventilation of the same device (mechanical ventilator), not a new device. The pressure in this modes varies according the mechanical parameters of the respiratory system that are automatically calculated by this mode. This is the intervention arm.
automatic tube compensation
new mode of ventilation during spontaneous breathing trial. It is a mode of the same device (mechanical ventilator) where the pressure applied by the ventilator varies according to calculations o fthe mechanical properties of the respiratory system automatically performed by the ventilator.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
automatic tube compensation
new mode of ventilation during spontaneous breathing trial. It is a mode of the same device (mechanical ventilator) where the pressure applied by the ventilator varies according to calculations o fthe mechanical properties of the respiratory system automatically performed by the ventilator.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* on mechanical ventilation at Thomason Hospital Intensive Care Unit for more than 24 hours
* about to undergo SBT by the current institutional protocol for weaning assessment ordered by their treating physician
* availability of informed consent from patient or next of kin
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* patients not considered for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation on the day of SBT
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Juan B. Figueroa-Casas
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juan B Figueroa-Casas, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistant Professor, Texas Tech University HSC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Hospital
El Paso, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E06040
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.