Iv Amiodarone Versus Iv Procainamide to Treat Haemodynamically Well Tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia

NCT ID: NCT00383799

Last Updated: 2016-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

302 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intravenous amiodarone has less cardiac significant adverse events compared to intravenous procainamide in the acute treatment of haemodynamically well tolerated wide QRS tachycardia, the majority of them of probably ventricular origen.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multicenter, prospective and randomized study in phase IV. A total of 302 patients will be included in the study within 40-50 institutions in Spain. Patients with regular and monomorphic tachycardia ≥ 120 bpm, QRS ≥ 120 ms and haemodynamically well tolerated will be randomized to receive iv amiodarone (single dosage: 5 mg/kg in 20 minutes) vs iv procainamide (single dosage: 10 mg/kg in 20 minutes). The study period will be 40 minutes from infusion initiation. Study variables include the presence of clinically cardiac significant adverse events: hypotension, syncope, heart failure, symptomatic sinus bradycardia, AV block, proarrhythmia and tachycardia acceleration (\<20 lpm)and death. Total observation period will be 24 hours after the end of the infusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventricular Tachycardia Wide QRS Tachycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

IV procainamide (single dose: 10 mg/kg over 20 min)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

iv Procainamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 2

IV Amiodarone (single dose: 5 mg/kg over 20 min)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

iv Amiodarone

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

iv Amiodarone

Intervention Type DRUG

iv Procainamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with stable tachycardia ≥120 lpm, QRS ≥120 ms and haemodynamically well tolerated defined as: 1)Systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, 2) absence of dyspnea at rest, 3)absence of peripheric hypoperfusion signs and 4)no severe angina.
* Age \> 18 years
* Written inform consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment with iv amiodarone or iv procainamide during the previous 24 hours
* QRS tachycardia \<120 ms
* Patients with QRS ≥120 ms tachycardia with haemodynamic compromise that requires urgent cardioversion for termination
* Irregular tachycardia
* Tachycardia that is considered as supraventricular due to physician criteria (adenosine and/or vagal manoeuvres response)
* Patient that do not want to cooperate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jesús Almendral, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Madrid. Spain

Fernando Arribas, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital General Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid. Spain

Rafael Peinado, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital General Universitario La Paz. Madrid. Spain

Alfonso Martín, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital de Móstoles. Madrid. Spain

Carmen del Arco, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital de la Princesa. Madrid. Spain

Dolores Vigil, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital general Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Madrid. Spain

Mercedes Ortiz, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Madrid. Spain

Blanca Coll-Vinent, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital Clinic. Barcelona. Spain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital El Escorial

El Escorial, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Getafe

Getafe, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Santa María del Rosell

Cartagena, Murcia, Spain

Site Status

Fundación Hospitalaria de Cieza

Cieza, Murcia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Los Arcos

San Javier, Murcia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinic

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Basurto

Bilbao, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital San Cecilio

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de las Nieves

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital 12 de Octubre

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico San Carlos

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de La Princesa

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Móstoles

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario La Paz

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Puerta de Hierro

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Carlos Haya

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Virgen de la Victoria

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Son Dureta

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Son Llatzer

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Donostia

San Sebastián, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Valme

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la Salud

Toledo, , Spain

Site Status

Hopital Clínico Universitario

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Río Hortega

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 6: advanced cardiovascular life support: section 5: pharmacology I: agents for arrhythmias. The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. 2000 Aug 22;102(8 Suppl):I112-28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10966669 (View on PubMed)

ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2005 Dec 13;112(24 Suppl):IV1-203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.166550. Epub 2005 Nov 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16314375 (View on PubMed)

Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, Buxton AE, Chaitman B, Fromer M, Gregoratos G, Klein G, Moss AJ, Myerburg RJ, Priori SG, Quinones MA, Roden DM, Silka MJ, Tracy C, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Antman EM, Anderson JL, Hunt SA, Halperin JL, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006 Sep 5;114(10):e385-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.178233. Epub 2006 Aug 25. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16935995 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-001505-25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.