Anti-arrhythmic Medication v. MRI-Merge Ablation in the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia

NCT ID: NCT00721032

Last Updated: 2017-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a morbid arrhythmia responsible for many sudden deaths and ICD shocks. Despite much progress in the treatment of arrhythmia, VT remains a therapeutic challenge. Most patients with VT have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death, however, an ICD merely treats VT, it does not prevent VT. In patients with recurrent VT and ICD shocks, two strategies are available to decrease the burden of VT. The first is antiarrhythmic drugs, and the second is VT ablation. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs and VT ablation guided by MRI. VT can sometimes be suppressed with antiarrhythmic medications, however, these are often ineffective, and carry a high burden of side effects. Many forms of VT can be cured by selective destruction of critical electrical pathways with catheter ablation. A major limitation in the ablation of VT, however, is the time required to localize scar tissue and important pathways for targeting of lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging can now obtain reliable images of scar location within the ventricles. Recent advances in electroanatomical mapping systems allow operators to import pre-acquired images into the mapping system. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of importing historic MRI scar maps of the ventricles into the electroanatomical system and using such images to guide catheter ablation, as compared to antiarrhythmic drug suppression of VT. We suspect that MRI guidance will be especially useful in patients with "unstable" VT, i.e. VT that causes an abrupt drop in blood pressure, and thus cannot be maintained in the electrophysiology (EP) lab for mapping and entertainment purposes. Patients referred for VT ablation have ICDs. Through previously completed animal work (Circulation 2004; 110(5): 475-82) and a human trial (2006 Sep 19;114(12):1277-84) we have demonstrated the safety of MRI in the setting of pacemakers and implantable defibrillators using appropriate precautions. Through careful device programming and using MRI sequences with limited energy exposure (specific absorption rate \< 2 W/kg) we will study the pre procedural myocardial anatomy of patients enrolled into this study.

The primary endpoint will be lack of VT documented by implantable defibrillator (when present) interrogation or Holter monitoring 6 months post ablation. The secondary endpoints will be comparison of inducible arrhythmia at the end of the procedure, procedure time, comparison of endocardial voltage mapping to scar on delayed enhancement MRI images, and complications in each study arm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventricular Tachycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MRI guided VT ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT)

2

Anti-arrhythmic group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Increased dose of amiodarone

Intervention Type DRUG

Increase the dose of amiodarone according to the following scheme:

current dose -\> new dose 100 once daily (QD) -\> 200 QD; 200 QD -\> 400 QD; 300 QD -\> 600 QD; 400 QD -\> 600 QD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MRI guided VT ablation

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Increased dose of amiodarone

Increase the dose of amiodarone according to the following scheme:

current dose -\> new dose 100 once daily (QD) -\> 200 QD; 200 QD -\> 400 QD; 300 QD -\> 600 QD; 400 QD -\> 600 QD

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Current treatment with amiodarone
* Ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
* Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia at any cycle length, with \> 1 occurrence of the same cycle length and morphology, at least one episode needs to be of sufficient duration to result in a shock.
* No contraindication to up titration of meds or to VT radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

Exclusion:

* Primary antiarrhythmic medication other than amiodarone
* Amiodarone at dose of 600 mg daily or higher
* Polymorphic VT as culprit rhythm
* History of metal exposure (welding)
* Pregnant women
* Recent myocardial infarction
* Planned coronary revascularization
* Implantable cardiac devices not previously tested for safety in the setting of MRI
* Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 30 ml/min
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NA_00011012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Therapy Cool Path Ablate VT
NCT00925522 TERMINATED NA
Functional Substrate-Only Guided VT Ablation
NCT06464315 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Ventricular Tachycardia Mechanisms
NCT05478213 RECRUITING NA